More than that, when are we going to figure out the pattern that every single time someone claims to have information with global repercussions it’s never been released? Other than Mike Lindell, no one has really ever shown their work. And he still has more to show in August, but at least I trust him.
More countdowns, more needlessly cryptic clues, more promises of world altering information, more promises of huge leaks and data dumps, more TickTock, more countdowns, and people who fall for it because they just can’t behave like adults. They continue to believe outright horseshit just because they want to, because it sounds like something they want to believe.
Dooming is expecting failure, often very intensively. "Nothing will ever work" sort of stuff.
This is just pragmatism; if information sources are proving inaccurate and have patterns to their inaccuracy, that's something to observe and note. People posting countdowns and talking big game but never putting up need to be more than just ignored, they need to be recognized as grifters and called out as such.
One of the things about this board that I would love to see change is that disagreement or presenting a counterpoint that isn't hopium-laced is sometimes called out as "dooming".
We are Patriots and free thinkers... This isn't a hive mind where everyone is expected to align on a single narrative or gtfo.
We can constructively disagree and even debate each other!
By your logic people on the left should never be skeptical of the system they are trapped in because they'd be 'dooming' on their base. We must all awaken, it's not enough to just blindly trust anyone who claims to be on your side, that's how we got in this mess in the first place. Critical thinking and analysis should be celebrated, not tribalism
Did you read the same comment i did? "this is why they are winning"? That's dooming to me because it ignores so much data it beggars belief.I call out what i see, and i see a lot of red flags here.
"Needlessly cryptic" = i havent been paying attention to Q drops/i dont understand the dangers of having data that could get DS agents imprisoned.
"more promises of world altering information" being horseshit = i wont believe any data dump potential despite being told a flood of it is coming by Q.
"not behaving like adults" = i dont recognise that other people can entertain an idea without them suffering from absolute cognitive bias because of entertaining it. Its a redditor level of understanding.
"this is why they are winning" = ive been ignoring anything positive on this board
As for mcafee:
Mcafee had spyware on clinton's devices. He had the data to cripple huge sections of the cabal.
He was hunted by the DS for years. Several failed assassination attempts. They dont spend that kind of effort on a nothing burger. Whether hes actually even dead now is still a big "?" as well.
Such a statement ignores the audit movement in state legislatures, the nuremberg trials for eu and israel, the growing suspicious nature of the push to vaccinate, and all the other wins gained.
He's been a huge proponent of freedom for years now, and has lost much doing so.
To round up:
The original response wasnt constructive, it was just critical and rather insulting. The response was ignorant of both guilliani's message of hopeful skepticism (entertaining an idea without accepting it as rote), and the activities outside the mcafee saga.
You know they are all fake channels right?
More than that, when are we going to figure out the pattern that every single time someone claims to have information with global repercussions it’s never been released? Other than Mike Lindell, no one has really ever shown their work. And he still has more to show in August, but at least I trust him.
More countdowns, more needlessly cryptic clues, more promises of world altering information, more promises of huge leaks and data dumps, more TickTock, more countdowns, and people who fall for it because they just can’t behave like adults. They continue to believe outright horseshit just because they want to, because it sounds like something they want to believe.
This is why they’re winning.
Do i smell dooming?
Dooming is expecting failure, often very intensively. "Nothing will ever work" sort of stuff.
This is just pragmatism; if information sources are proving inaccurate and have patterns to their inaccuracy, that's something to observe and note. People posting countdowns and talking big game but never putting up need to be more than just ignored, they need to be recognized as grifters and called out as such.
Thank you! Couldn't have put it better myself.
One of the things about this board that I would love to see change is that disagreement or presenting a counterpoint that isn't hopium-laced is sometimes called out as "dooming".
We are Patriots and free thinkers... This isn't a hive mind where everyone is expected to align on a single narrative or gtfo.
We can constructively disagree and even debate each other!
It is not pragmatism to say the enemy is winning, fren.
By your logic people on the left should never be skeptical of the system they are trapped in because they'd be 'dooming' on their base. We must all awaken, it's not enough to just blindly trust anyone who claims to be on your side, that's how we got in this mess in the first place. Critical thinking and analysis should be celebrated, not tribalism
Did you read the same comment i did? "this is why they are winning"? That's dooming to me because it ignores so much data it beggars belief.I call out what i see, and i see a lot of red flags here.
"Needlessly cryptic" = i havent been paying attention to Q drops/i dont understand the dangers of having data that could get DS agents imprisoned.
"more promises of world altering information" being horseshit = i wont believe any data dump potential despite being told a flood of it is coming by Q.
"not behaving like adults" = i dont recognise that other people can entertain an idea without them suffering from absolute cognitive bias because of entertaining it. Its a redditor level of understanding.
"this is why they are winning" = ive been ignoring anything positive on this board
As for mcafee:
To round up: The original response wasnt constructive, it was just critical and rather insulting. The response was ignorant of both guilliani's message of hopeful skepticism (entertaining an idea without accepting it as rote), and the activities outside the mcafee saga.
You know that for certain? Right on.
Not all, no.