Did you read the same comment i did? "this is why they are winning"? That's dooming to me because it ignores so much data it beggars belief.I call out what i see, and i see a lot of red flags here.

"Needlessly cryptic" = i havent been paying attention to Q drops/i dont understand the dangers of having data that could get DS agents imprisoned.

"more promises of world altering information" being horseshit = i wont believe any data dump potential despite being told a flood of it is coming by Q.

"not behaving like adults" = i dont recognise that other people can entertain an idea without them suffering from absolute cognitive bias because of entertaining it. Its a redditor level of understanding.

"this is why they are winning" = ive been ignoring anything positive on this board

As for mcafee:

1. Mcafee had spyware on clinton's devices. He had the data to cripple huge sections of the cabal.
2. He was hunted by the DS for years. Several failed assassination attempts. They dont spend that kind of effort on a nothing burger. Whether hes actually even dead now is still a big "?" as well.
3. Such a statement ignores the audit movement in state legislatures, the nuremberg trials for eu and israel, the growing suspicious nature of the push to vaccinate, and all the other wins gained.
4. He's been a huge proponent of freedom for years now, and has lost much doing so.

To round up: The original response wasnt constructive, it was just critical and rather insulting. The response was ignorant of both guilliani's message of hopeful skepticism (entertaining an idea without accepting it as rote), and the activities outside the mcafee saga.