It has come to my attention that this is not widely known information, so I present evidence for an illegal vaccine EUA.
The law shows the vaccine is not allowed to be used for emergency use if there is a viable treatment available.
"(c)Criteria for issuance of authorization
...
(3)that there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating such disease or condition;"
These studies show that there are numerous treatments available for Covid-19. These are metadata analyses which include, in total, links to hundreds of studies and journal papers that have looked into the efficacy of Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D and many other treatments (tabs at the top of page for meta analysis on each treatment type, each one containing links to many independent published studies). By all available data these treatments have higher efficacy than the vaccines. All of these have evidence that far exceeds the levels any of the vaccines have attained in all categories of numbers, tests, efficacy and safety.
Back in 2020 HCQ was being reported as the worst thing ever. This was fundamental in getting the vaccine an EUA. However in 2005 they knew it was a viable treatment for SARS, but in 2020 they said it would kill people. Here is a report with links to a paper that shows that a study done in March 2020 was using a potentially dangerous dosage of HCQ which will have almost certainly skewed the results of the tests.
From the paper:
"A loading dose is important because of the large volume of distribution. The loading dose will be 800 mg, administered 6-hourly,until 2 doses have been administered. Subsequently, starting 12 hours after the first loading dose, the dose will be 400 mg administered 12-hourly for 12 doses"
That is 2400 mg in 24 hours.
This shows the recommended dosages for HCQ. The maximum dose for a single day is half that, most are 1/6th. At the very least these extreme dosages skewed the results on this "failure" of HCQ testing in the beginning of the Pandemic, which drove the negative press narrative. At worst such high dosages caused overdose related death or injury in the sick people it was used in.
Since there are viable and proven treatments available, the EUA is illegal. They are not "approved" treatments, but they have far exceeded the standard of proof of approval by any standard, and far, far above the vaccines in use. They all have decades of efficacy and safety usage and are approved for numerous other infection type diseases, and are considered among the safest (and best) medications known to man.
Correct. This is also the first issue discussed in the new lawsuit from America's Frontline Doctors! EUA was granted illegally! Everything after that has to be considered illegal as well...the dominos are starting to fall quick!
And the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons is suing the FDA over restricting HCQ.
The Nuremburg trials need to start now!
This is precisely why they censored any discussions about HCQ, Ivermectin, etc and other medical opinions outside of their narrative.
Thank you, for pointing this out again!
Together with the demise of the PCR ..... there is no pandemic, yet a grand theft RIGHTS has been perpetrated on us all, costing us dearly, and not only pecuniary.
Except the FDA has not approved HCQ or Ivermectin for the treatment of the coof. So they got control over that narrative.
EUA allows for repurposing FDA approved drugs for use off-label.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/13/7/pdfs/06-1188.pdf
NIH and CDC are required to base decisions on the totality of the scientific evidence.
Yes. I mentioned that. However, it has far surpassed the standard for that approval as I outlined a bit in the OP. So yes, they control the narrative, but it is so easy to prove (scientifically) that the standard has been met with the available data that it is criminal to not approve them immediately. By extension that also proves the EUA illegal.
Let's analyze the logic of "adequate, approved, and available". I see this as adequate AND approved AND available. If one of the 3 fails, the entire expression evaluates to FALSE. The FDA controls what is approved, therefore they can always make the expression fail.
A fundamental flaw in the system.
They can also approve a vaccine that kills more people than all other vaccines combined (officially).
On a whim.
Perhaps there is a fundamental problem there.
Second that.
Nice high energy post fren
We knew this over 1 year ago and nothing has happened, but I’m sure they’ll listen this time.
Its not about us knowing or them listening specifically; its more about "how many of us know" and "how good of details and knowledge can we bring to a debate about it."
We don't win by being listened to by those that won't listen in any one exchange, we win by continuously bringing the evidence, getting the arguments and data more and more airtight. The domino's might seem like they are falling too slowing, but they are falling (and its not that slowly).