OG user and quality poster "TheQStrategy" was just banned from here. For "harassing users".
Does that sound right to you?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
The term "famefag" is a thing because of "famefags". TQS definitely acted like a "famefag". No question about it.
It's one thing to present information. It's another to claim others' work as your own. TQS did the latter and, combined with their demeanor and how they interacted with others that challenged the post or opinion, they were definitely under the "famefag" umbrella.
It's good that TQS shared disseminated information aggregated from 8kun.
It's bad that TQS tried to take Notables from 8kun's qresearch threads and pass them off as their own here on GAW. If the account weren't deleted, this could be easily demonstrated going through bakes and timestamps. I always enjoyed the "...my and other anons' research..." in the titles or comments when it happened too.
Thank you for the virtue lecture but at the end of the day, TQS was an obnoxious, condescending, sanctimonious plagiarist that let their fragile ego be known when just about anyone didn't agree with them or jerk them off. TQS was about 3 months from becoming a Paytriot.
Just because I never liked what they did doesn't mean you have to subscribe to it. I'm just calling a spade a spade. Am I Pretty close, "/u/AllMostThere"? lol
Regardless of all of that, I would still have a beer or a whatever with TQS. WWG1WGA - But that doesn't mean we have to hide behind disingenuous sanctimony the way TQS did, especially when all they were really good for was copy/pasting from 8kun to GAW.
You're not jerk, Roofie. You have some humility, you have a sense of humor, and you display emotional stability. You are not sanctimonious. There's a few differences.