No!!!!!, you should die now!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
Are you retarded or something? I'm just trying to get you to understand what the position you claim to hold actually involves. Is playboy okay? It's just nudes, no sex acts. It doesn't fall under your definition, but it's something I still would consider porn. If you're going to make laws like this these are discussions that need to be had.
Is breath play okay? Is ryona? Foot fetishes? Where do you draw the line? Do you really trust the government to not abuse this new power? If you don't want tyranny the government needs hard lines.
You are using the same lefty tactics that were taught to college students by their communist professors. The same tactics Saul taught all his devil worshipping disciples. You just want to dull the attack. Go back to jacking off and leave the details to those interested in a real solution to the filth permeating society. Head on back down to the library and give the dim wit mommies and their kiddies one of your shows. Your tactics are obvious and boring.
I literally lead this by saying I agree with you and am just asking questions about how you would realistically implement such a thing. Trying to show you it's much much more complicated than just banning porn. Your anger is due to your position being founded on fantasy and not reality and when asked simple questions about how you would implement such a thing your brain breaks down because you haven't thought about how your position would actually be applied to reality.
You don't agree with me. You just want to pursue the usual tactics of the left. It is all you know how to do.
The minute you brought up Playboy you exposed your agenda. I knew exactly who I was dealing with and where you would go with it. If folks pay attention they will recognize the tactics over and over again. Most of you just can't get far into Alinsky's rule set. You don't have the intellectual capacity to go deeper. Your reply asking if the poster opposing you was a retard went right to Rule 5 ridicule. Don't try to tell me you agree with me. It just doesn't wash.
You want to play devil's advocate because the devil is your god. Your job is to subvert any attempt to stop his filth. It is the same every time one of you shows itself.
Nicely done friend 👍
You're insane, you know that. Call me a satanist because I simply want you to explain how you would go about doing what you claim to want to do. You're absolutely insane.
Why did those questions make you so uncomfortable? If you think nude photos should be banned, why not just say so instead of attacking me? I didn't say banning nude photos was a bad thing, I just wanted your opinion on it.
You can't just daydream, you need a plan. If you want to restrict porn, you need to know exactly what you're restricting or the government will use this power for evil. This is just how laws work, they need to be specific. Why does this offend you? You're so odd.
So last chance to show you have some semblance of thought going on up there; what law do you want applied exactly? Should any nudity be alllowed? If you restrict it to no sex acts only, things like Playboy will still slip through. Okay, so add a no nudity rule. That takes care of playboy, but now your no nudity rule also applies to art and movies. Do these things fall under no nudity or should there be an exception for nude art like paintings and stautes? Who decides what's "art" and what's porn then? What about PG-13 sex scenes in movies, should those fall under the porn restriction too? If your answer to all of this is yes ban it all, that's fine, I totally understand, I'm just curious how you would handle it because to me there doesn't seem to be an easy answer.
If you actually want this for society these are the questions you will have to answer. We need to know these things to make a law about it. Do you have an answer for these questions or will you just ignore them because thinking about them seems to make you angry for some insane reason.
Had to look this one up, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryona
Seems it involves abuse. (Yup, wikipedia. Deal with it.)
From wikepedia:
The term is contrasted with sexual sadism and rape pornography, in that ryona is a voyeuristic fantasy fetish, a romanticized subgenre aimed at a female target demographic and are almost always of non-explicit sexual nature.
The nature of abuse can vary greatly, but it usually includes one or more of the following:
So that's that. Violence, rape, torture, amputation...surprised to see it being offered here alongside "Playboy" as an innocuous alternative to hardcore.
Innocuous? My point was more that just banning sex acts or nudity wouldn't cover stuff like that. I'm not advocating for anyone to watch porn of any kind.