Agree completely. The point is, if using their own logic to justify mandates - preventing transmission - the science shows only Ivermectin comes close delivering that result.
The NNV—the number of people you need to vaccinate to prevent one case of COVID—for each of these vaccines lies in the low 70,000’s.
Even if you vaccinated all 328.2 million people in the USA, you’d only prevent roughly 5,000 cases of COVID at best, about 4,000 at worst. It does absolutely nothing for transmission.
What does "rate of transmission for the vaccinated" mean?? There is no transmission from healthy people to the sick (vaccinated). The vaccinated are their own infection or sickness vector. They are LOADED with the spike protein, and it is causing them to display the symptoms associated with the fake virus. What does this have to do with the unvaccinated??
There are already new variants that the vaccine does NOT protect against at all.
What they are finding is that the vaccine only protects against a handful of variants. The vaccine programs your body to respond a certain way, but there is an arrested development as far as you bodies ability to adapt to new variants. You'll get locked into producing the same antibodies over and over. They will not help in neutralizing certain variants.
It seems like because of that there will be a variant at some point that is not effected by the vax induced response AT ALL.
That would mean that there would be a variant that when attacking a vaccinate person became super deadly to vaccinated people. It may be mo more deadly to unvaccinated people than covid has ever been, and if you already had covid and have natural immunity your body would beat it no problem, but if you have been vaccinated and it comes any where near you you will assuredly become infected and suffer greatly because your programmed response will have been as good as having NO response AT ALL.
it would almost assuredly kill any vaccinated person it contacted but luckily there is ivermectin.
Interesting info I just read:
"Among fully vaccinated people who never had COVID-19, getting a third dose of an mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna would likely increase levels of antibodies, but not antibodies that are better able to neutralize new virus variants, Rockefeller University researchers reported on Thursday on bioRxiv https://bit.ly/3fnbk6Y ahead of peer review. They note that in COVID-19 survivors, the immune system's antibodies evolve during the first year, becoming more potent and better able to resist new variants. In 32 volunteers who never had COVID-19, they found that antibodies induced by mRNA vaccines did evolve between the first and second shots. But five months later, vaccine-induced antibodies were "equivalent" to those seen after the second dose, with "little measurable improvement" in the antibodies' ability to neutralize a broad variety of new variants, "
DECLAS
LP “Viva Le Resistance.”
Viv[a] vs Viv[e]
[J C]
Why classified by intel comm @ highest level?
Define title.
Define role w/ Mueller.
Exchange shelters VERY senior member.
Q
It's been posted numerous times, but it's worth reposting:
Vaccine Mandate Protest Letter https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/upost/889925/vaccine-mandate-protest-letter
then they should be mandating Ivermectin.
I'm for zero mandates - it's not the govt's job or corporations to dictate the medications we put into our bodies. Because where does it stop?
But your point is well taken
They really truly should.
Mandate nothing. Provide info, remove barriers to known treatments and let ppl choose.
Agree completely. The point is, if using their own logic to justify mandates - preventing transmission - the science shows only Ivermectin comes close delivering that result.
There are 328.2 million people in the US.
The NNV—the number of people you need to vaccinate to prevent one case of COVID—for each of these vaccines lies in the low 70,000’s.
Even if you vaccinated all 328.2 million people in the USA, you’d only prevent roughly 5,000 cases of COVID at best, about 4,000 at worst. It does absolutely nothing for transmission.
This was shown in an article in The Lancet.
At this point people aren't even masking where I am. The clerks have non b eart for it anymore they all know its a lie.
What does "rate of transmission for the vaccinated" mean?? There is no transmission from healthy people to the sick (vaccinated). The vaccinated are their own infection or sickness vector. They are LOADED with the spike protein, and it is causing them to display the symptoms associated with the fake virus. What does this have to do with the unvaccinated??
I notice a lot of ppl have moved to the language of vaccinated for something that is not a vaccine, but gene therapy. See how they influence us?
Jabbed ppl are virus factories compared to unjabbed who are more like virus battlegrounds.
This Gene Therapy is desiring ppls health right in front of us. Sometimes fast, sometimes slow. Unless they received a placebo.
There are already new variants that the vaccine does NOT protect against at all.
What they are finding is that the vaccine only protects against a handful of variants. The vaccine programs your body to respond a certain way, but there is an arrested development as far as you bodies ability to adapt to new variants. You'll get locked into producing the same antibodies over and over. They will not help in neutralizing certain variants.
It seems like because of that there will be a variant at some point that is not effected by the vax induced response AT ALL. That would mean that there would be a variant that when attacking a vaccinate person became super deadly to vaccinated people. It may be mo more deadly to unvaccinated people than covid has ever been, and if you already had covid and have natural immunity your body would beat it no problem, but if you have been vaccinated and it comes any where near you you will assuredly become infected and suffer greatly because your programmed response will have been as good as having NO response AT ALL.
it would almost assuredly kill any vaccinated person it contacted but luckily there is ivermectin.
Interesting info I just read: "Among fully vaccinated people who never had COVID-19, getting a third dose of an mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna would likely increase levels of antibodies, but not antibodies that are better able to neutralize new virus variants, Rockefeller University researchers reported on Thursday on bioRxiv https://bit.ly/3fnbk6Y ahead of peer review. They note that in COVID-19 survivors, the immune system's antibodies evolve during the first year, becoming more potent and better able to resist new variants. In 32 volunteers who never had COVID-19, they found that antibodies induced by mRNA vaccines did evolve between the first and second shots. But five months later, vaccine-induced antibodies were "equivalent" to those seen after the second dose, with "little measurable improvement" in the antibodies' ability to neutralize a broad variety of new variants, "
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/delta-infections-among-vaccinated-likely-192553854.html
Viva????
https://qagg.news/?read=1559
DECLAS LP “Viva Le Resistance.” Viv[a] vs Viv[e] [J C] Why classified by intel comm @ highest level? Define title. Define role w/ Mueller. Exchange shelters VERY senior member. Q
"Viva" in this instance stands for Viva Frei, a Canadian Lawyer and Youtuber who does a weekly livestream with Robert Barnes
So I don't know if it's related
Was just showing a possible link. Nothing more