🔥🔥UK GOVERNMENT RELEASE REPORT SHOWING VAXXED PEOPLE ARE 10X LIKELIER TO DIE FROM DELTA VARIANT.🔥🔥
(assets.publishing.service.gov.uk)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Look at pages 18-19. This data shows that only 20% of vaccinated people are catching the Delta variant in yet those 20% account for 70% of the Delta Deaths.
They will try to spin it any number of ways.
The bottom line is this: It appears that there is something in those experimental drugs that is causing harm to millions of people.
THAT is the story.
Quick-digest picture version here
Awesome, can you ad a calculation of your chances to Die from it jabbed vs not jabbed? I would assume it's pretty staggering. something like 10x that of unvaxxed
At this point, we can only guess at that since we don't know the true % of population that is actually vaccinated. Some accounts are estimating it as low as 35-40% whereas others are saying it's near 70%.
If we put a best guess at 55%, then we can say that 37.4M are vaccinated and 30.6M are not.
So vaccinated your chance of getting Delta is 0.22% UnVax your chance is 0.40%
If we extrapolate that to deaths, then: Vaccinated your chance of dying is 0.00077% UnVax your chance is 0.00054%
A difference of 0.00023% or 42.6% MORE people will die with the vax than without.
You also have to consider exactly when the UK started vaxxing, and account for when the vaxx kicks in (I read 28 days after shot). For that period, the only cases and deaths would be from the unvaxxed.
I'm trying to figure out where you got 289 from, I see that total deaths from vaccinated is 224?
I added anyone exposed to the vaccine, so I added up the "X days post dose 1" as well as the fully vaccinated and excluded the "unlinked".
How can they even know if someone has the Delta variant if there IS NO TEST TO CONFIRM IT?!?!?!
There is a test but not ran on the public. I do think the data is fake for delta numbers.
Correct, no test. But I think with a lab and a microscope they can tell the difference.
Or I just got brainwashed from some media but that’s what they’re saying.
THERE IS NO TEST FOR DELTA OR ANY ‘VARIANT’. Stop this disinformation nonsense.
According to their own disinformation (if they cant test), They admit that more vaxed are dying.
But it is important to know the cause, which is the jab not the flu.
Very true it could very well be AED
The headline should be renamed.
"UK Government release report showing Vaxxed people are 10X more likely to die due to VAXX".
🔥🔥HOW CAN THEY TELL????🔥🔥
Look at the report. They are running full genetic sequencing on the samples
1.) What lab has actually isolated any covid variants to baseline a DNA genome sequence?
2.) W.H.O. put this out right? Do I even need to say any more?
The point is that Their own data is saying vaccinated people are 10x more likely.
But if you want papers on isolation here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT560525.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT019532 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036342/#!po=30.0000 https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.00543-20?permanently=true https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247524
Why am I not surprised the isolation was provided by the NIH last year?
And again, the WHO, pushed the pcr test for how long at levels So ridiculous that fruit came down positive? My point is who believes anything they all say now?
BTW, I think all versions of the jab are insane and dangerous.
I agree. Likely the jab is whats leading to the 10x increase in death for vaccined due to ADE
This is not isolation. Sure the word is (mis)used. These are cell cultures, what passes for isolation in the world of virology.
The first link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947 is literally the sequence. "attaaaggtt tataccttcc caggtaacaa accaaccaac tttcgatctc ttgtagatct..." etc
Yes, a computer generated sequence. It is not reality. The sequence was not pulled directly out of an organism, it was composed from found RNA fragments along with fragments mined from a genome database to fill the many holes. The pieces are assembled by computer heuristics. A heuristic can not guarantee that what results is real. Unlike a jigsaw puzzle, a bioinformatic puzzle will have many possible ways of being put together, and there is no final picture to act as a sanity check. It's all biased assumptions and random selections.
You are correct. However, if you have people exhibiting the same symptoms and all have this same puzzle piece and people without the symptoms don't have this, whatever the thing may be, its likely whats causing the issue or associated with the issue. It's a logical conclusion.
You cant have it both ways, created in a lab, and doesn't exist.