but, so far the sheeple in the UK have seen this a "randy andy" gets caught, bit embarassing, he did a terrible interview that made him look guilty, but they still don't appreciate the bigger picture
if more info comes out, more light on his activities and the delicate balance where the public tolerate the royal family here could swing .. all part of the necessary awakening to shed the shackles of our rulers
As a member of the royal family, he unfortunately may have diplomatic immunity.
There's no such thing as legitimate diplomatic immunity from arrest for felonies or crimes against humanity
Because if not can you imagine...
Hey, stop robbing the bank and raping that teller with your gun
-- I'm the prince of England
Oh OK then, carry on
Remember that woman who ran over a kid in England and claimed diplomatic immunity because her husband is an American diplomat over there?
Remember how she still hasn’t been extradited even though she murdered a teenager and hoped on the first plane back to the USA after the fact?
It’s not fair, but it’s the current policy.
Hence my use of the modifier LEGITIMATE
There is no LEGITIMATE diplomatic immunity for felonies like murder
Doesn't mean diplomats don't get away with murder
There is that CIA lady who ran someone over in England, then fled back to US, and claiming diplomatic immunity.
That would be a declaration of war if a royal was arrested, for whatever charge.
but, so far the sheeple in the UK have seen this a "randy andy" gets caught, bit embarassing, he did a terrible interview that made him look guilty, but they still don't appreciate the bigger picture
if more info comes out, more light on his activities and the delicate balance where the public tolerate the royal family here could swing .. all part of the necessary awakening to shed the shackles of our rulers