Is it any wonder that wouldn't be in the CNN article?
I'm looking at the choice those 3 airlines made, versus the ones that are having problems keeping planes in the air. Whatever their motivations, their choice will keep them flying and keep them in business.
Fuckin classic. United should crash and burn, although I'm rather surprised that woke Delta didn't jump on the bandwagon. IMO, I wish they'd disclose the pilot status between companies/flights so I can evaluate the clot risk prior to flying.
Hmm I think this might be more because of employees quitting/striking than public backlash. Just in the last week I remember reading somewhere about tons of flights being canceled because they were understaffed.
This is a bigger win for those airlines more than anything and a huge PR move. Right now it's hard for companies to find workers. Literally every business is struggling to find workers and this will ensure these companies get a swell of workers who abandon United and other airlines who follow.
Not a surprise at all anons. They been doing this the whole plandemic. It’s all a bluff. How many muppets in your network said “I got the jab bc I wanted to travel again” They false and demanding words down the road turn into the article you are referencing.
Sounds like Southwest, AA, and Delta might have just gained a major advantage over United, and given employees that get fired by United for not vaxxing another job option.
Jabbed new hires but unjabbed existing employees makes absolutely no sense.
'Guess they don't want to hire anyone other than brainwashed sheeple who might have health issues or die from the jab in a few years. (Not a good thing when the employee group includes pilots who fly expensive planes with hundreds of passengers.)
Those three airlines apparently want to stay in the air and stay in business.
Could be but don't see that in CNN article.
And I bet that if a lot of United people leave because of jab requirement, they will not be considered, from the point of the jab, as new hires.
Is it any wonder that wouldn't be in the CNN article?
I'm looking at the choice those 3 airlines made, versus the ones that are having problems keeping planes in the air. Whatever their motivations, their choice will keep them flying and keep them in business.
Fuckin classic. United should crash and burn, although I'm rather surprised that woke Delta didn't jump on the bandwagon. IMO, I wish they'd disclose the pilot status between companies/flights so I can evaluate the clot risk prior to flying.
Fur Sur! I don't want to be taking a ride in the stratosphere with some brain clot addled aviator.
RIP all those who caved after the initial threat. Should have called the bluff.
Great PR move hahaha.
Hmm I think this might be more because of employees quitting/striking than public backlash. Just in the last week I remember reading somewhere about tons of flights being canceled because they were understaffed.
This is a bigger win for those airlines more than anything and a huge PR move. Right now it's hard for companies to find workers. Literally every business is struggling to find workers and this will ensure these companies get a swell of workers who abandon United and other airlines who follow.
Let United (and Delta) go bankrupt if they don't back off their stupid mandates. Idiots.
Not a surprise at all anons. They been doing this the whole plandemic. It’s all a bluff. How many muppets in your network said “I got the jab bc I wanted to travel again” They false and demanding words down the road turn into the article you are referencing.
Angry stockholders
They will just make everyone take a test every work day
Sounds like Southwest, AA, and Delta might have just gained a major advantage over United, and given employees that get fired by United for not vaxxing another job option.
Except they are requiring new employees to be vaxxed.
I think that was just Delta (so they're still on the shit list)
My bet is if the new employee was a veteran new hire from the United stable that left due to forced jab, that they would not force a jab either.
Requiring it for a new hire is no no different, imho.
Jabbed new hires but unjabbed existing employees makes absolutely no sense.
'Guess they don't want to hire anyone other than brainwashed sheeple who might have health issues or die from the jab in a few years. (Not a good thing when the employee group includes pilots who fly expensive planes with hundreds of passengers.)
More then likely a whole portfolio of pictures.