I understand what they are supposed to be, but how did Mike get his hands on them? And how does he know what he has are legit?
To go along with that, does he have anyway of proving these are legit captures? or is that what this is supposed to prove?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
You type your 5020th 'LOL' from mom's basement once again, post a random image.. No actual content.
Yet don't travel to SD to collect the easy 5 mil to finally move out of mom's basement.
Seems legit. Checks out.. (sorry your pedo world is crumbling down around you)
"Posting like a faggot" would be nothing more than providing the most basic three letters of 'LOL'. It is the most minimalistic, laziest form of doing the most absolute next to nothing, possible. You are of the degenerate movement that thinks 'LOL' is an argument.
You may try to pretend to act like an ally in this fight. But you give your position away easily. If you have something worth while, speak it. Or get off the pot.
If you were truely drawn to Lindell and these three days.. spit it out, or get off the pot.
If you are unimpressed with Lindell today, and the last 9 months, you factually wouldn't be here now. Not given your short, and obvious post history. You are only here to try and stop the the unstopable drain flow. Not working.
There are millions here to learn more or observe for the first time. They post nothing but learn. Your past, useless posts are logged. You tried to be stealth for brief minute. But the good people here will sniff you out and act accordingly.
I stand by my, sorry your degenerate community is threatened by true Americans finally waking up. There is truth here if you wish to wake up. There is no judgement here on past decisions made.
It is inconceivable that the pcaps under discussion here were not encrypted. The fact that Mike has them likely means whomever obtained them had access to the cryptographic keys involved. If so, then it is effectively impossible that they were altered. Faking them would also be effectively impossible. Consider them as safe and certain as your digital banking activity. Therefore, your criticisms are a bit wrongheaded. Regardless, mocking laughter is a form of logical fallacy and makes you look like a jackass. You should always strive to treat others with respect, how I'm sure you would like to be treated, yourself.
You can edit captures, but it would be very easy to find something in it - timestamp, IP addresses, event of sequence - something that does not correspond to what happened that day.
I respectfully disagree with this. What all these tools do is make sure the edited capture is valid, and pass all integrity checks, and can even ensure specific vagaries of the hardware/network stack used are reflected in the edited packets.
But what they cannot do is ensure the edited packets perfectly capture all verifiable events of the day. That is a job for humans, or very sophisticated AI (even more sophisticated than Zuck).
The way I explain this to people is, think of capture editing as photoshopping.
You can photoshop it so well that a picture looks real in every way. But making sure that whats shown in the picture - the trees, the leaves, the buildings - correspond to where they are in reality, its a totally different question.
The best part about this place is, it takes just one person such as yourself to point out the misinformation, and its gone.
any text/file/data can be altered, yes, but when there are corresponding matching text/file/data elsewhere any alteration would be detectable by comparing them. ipso facto they cannot be altered (without detection).
IF you have packets of info that change an election result, and the election result was changed, then the packets are real. If they are not real, and faked, then the results which tally with them are also fake. So by discrediting the packets, you discredit the election result. If you accept the packets are real, and they do not tally with the audited results, then you prove the election was tampered with. It is a double bind.