It is to my understanding that germ theory states that disease is caused by microscopic "organisms" which include bacteria and viruses. And that these multiply in infected individuals, and those infected individuals can then spread those bacteria and viruses to others.
I think we've all observed one person getting sick with something, and then spreading that to others in close proximity who then get sick.
It's hard to summarize in an accurate manner, but start by looking into pasteur vs bechamp when "germ theory" was first being published. Bechamps "terrain theory" surmises that disease is primarily from a weakened or compromised immune system that no longer fights off bacterial, parasitic, or fungal infections.
Sounds similar to germ theory until you look into it and realize that viruses can not be transferred from one organism to another without being injected directly into the blood. Viruses are basically a natural process of cells shedding waste, they're not "alive." In other words, germ theory is a hoax because people don't transmit illnesses to each other like we're told, except in a case of bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infections for obvious reasons.
Also it's important to note that there are two times in the year most people get sick: "flu season", and "allergy season." It can certainly appear that illnesses spread during times where most people naturally "get sick" or "detox."
Some thoughts:
That seems to be why ivermectin is so effective- it’s neutralising parasites. HCQ has been proven to be an effective antifungal. And there are many proven antibacterials such as colloidal silver, echinacea, oregano oil, olive leaf extract, even honey.
You are confusing viruses and bacteria. Viruses are little more than DNA packages which need other organisms in order to reproduce. Bacteria are one-celled life forms that can survive on their own and multiply on their own as long as they have access to water, nutrients, etc. In general, I always heard "germs" in reference to bacteria, not viruses. So germ theory is not a hoax, no matter what viruses are or do.
Look into terrain theory. From what I understand it is the belief that bacteria/viruses do not cause disease themselves. They are merely attracted to an already dysfunctional/diseased tissue and they will replicate there, but it is not these bacteria/viruses themselves causing the pathogenesis. I'm not sure I believe it either, but I have seen some doctors who do. Since 90-99% of everything we learned in school is bullshit, I would actually probably lean on the side of germ theory also being bullshit as well, just statistically. God bless all my fellow Patriots. WWG1WGA!
The situation you question is due to "bio-resonance" between people that co-exist within similar toxic environments, similar air, food, water, etc. This situation is exacerbated in the winter months when people don't get outdoors, fresh air, etc. nearly as often. Greater alcohol consumption during colder months is also a major contributor.
If you step back and think it though, you'll note that the vast majority of the time, this did NOT happen, where only one person in a family, office, school, etc. was ill.
Germ theory is complete hoax beginning to end. Contagion is a myth. Viruses don't exist (as defined by mainstream medicine) and have never been "isolated". Bacteria are scavengers, clean-up crews. There have been over 70 studies, primarily undertaken from 1900-1950, that have attempted to prove contagion by "alleged viruses" or bacteria. All of them failed miserably. This is why you can't find any studies after 1950 even attempting to prove "human to human transmission".
You can waste your time reading modern studies where scientists inject various toxic cocktails into rats, guinea pigs, mice, etc. and buy it if you like. But the simple truth is, when you inject ANYTHING into the bloodstream and sterile environment of the body, it causes problems. That's why they vax us.
But you'll never find any studies with "sick people" infecting "healthy people" via sneezing on each other, coughing on each other, ingesting a sick person's saliva/mucous, sharing silverware, drinking/eating from same glasses/plates, etc. It never works, never has, and they don't even try anymore. Precisely because, contagion is a myth and germ theory is a hoax.
Chicken pox and measles are a different story entirely. These are childhood upgrade events that are POSITIVE in nature and BENEFIT the child through their entire lifetime. This is a classic example of bio-resonance. One hundred years ago, women were wise to host "chicken pox parties". Establishment medicine destroyed this motherly wisdom, as with everything else.
When I was growing up in the 50's my mom had all of us eat off of each other's plates so we would all come down with Chicken pox, Mumps or the Measles at the same time (I was one of 6 kids). She wanted to make sure we all got it when we were younger rather than go sterile from mumps or measles at an older age or to be sicker later on. All of these are typically easy to get over when you are a kid. I never heard of anyone dying from them at the time I was growing up but I suspect there may have always been a rare person who did. So I never understood the reason to vax for these kids illnesses. Was it to keep them from being sick for a week to 10 days so a working mom or dad wouldn't have to stay home with them?
My mom said she wouldn't have even known that I got Chicken pox when I was 2 because I got a very mild form of it. Two spots on my butt that I walked around scratching.
I had all those diseases as a kid and am completely immune for life now. No need for any vax for these shots and for all purposes no need for any boosters bc the shots for them don't always work.
Exactly. We're living in an inverted reality. Establishment medicine is at peak inversion now. None of these so-called "diseases" are harmful in any way. There are several studies proving that children who get them are far healthier adults across the board.
The "reason" for all these vaccines is to cause long-term health issues and lifelong customers of the pharma industry - plain and simple.
Mainstream medicine labels everything a "disease", when in fact, these symptoms (aka bumps/pox) are signs of healing in every regard.
Your mom was intuitively wise. Hopefully you[ll pass this wisdom on to all you know.
Flus are detoxification events. When the body detoxes, it recruits all energies to perform the detox as quickly as possible. So rather than 10-days, 2/3/4 weeks of "detoxing", while still maintaining a relatively normal lifestyle, the body saps all your energy which forces you to rest.
Unfortunately, this thing labeled "ConVid-1984" is a bit more complex. Nobody likes the explanation I believe is most accurate but I'll share it anyway. This "disease" is actually a re-balancing and alignment event. Those that are weak, in poor health, breathe too shallowly, lack proper sleep and/or live a life of non-stop activity are the most likely to "get sick". In short, they need more oxygen, relaxation and presence in their lives. If you evaluate the symptoms carefully, you'll see that this "illness" forces them to get exactly this.
If you're interested in reading a good book on the topic, you can find Dr. Tom Cowan's "The Contagion Myth" on alternative book platforms. Everything is explained in great detail.
This. This is exactly why, when Covid was first announced, I tried to get it myself so I could give it to my wife and kids and we would be done with the whole thing.
Guess what?? I couldn't even catch a case. It took a few months before I realized there was no pandemic.
My mom had a chicken pox party in 1987, my brother got it and they got together all the cousins, set up Atari, or coleco however that's spelled and let us all hang out, I was six... All I really remember after that was calamine lotion and oatmeal baths😒 thanks mom.
The idea that the body is a deterministic system, like a car, and that the outcomes of this system are purely dependent on physical inputs (ignoring the mind completely).
This leads to beliefs like that the body will fall apart unless you take it to a mechanic; that health is not something you create; that you need to get injected with health from the outside, and that you desperately need doctors for survival.
None of these ideas are true, and they are in fact highly detrimental.
This is probably the book the anon is basing because it uses the same terminology. For example the first chapter of this books is: Part 1: EXPOSING THE GERM THEORY
I think we've all observed one person getting sick with something, and then spreading that to others in close proximity who then get sick.
This is addressed in this last book around page 69. Search for "when these aboriginal peoples first met the European colonists? Didn’t they begin to suffer from infectious disease".
"An estimated two million seamen died of scurvy during those years. These are the centuries where people are first crossing the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean, and the Pacific, and the problem incident to all of those voyages was that you were going to be at sea continuously, probably for more than three months, at some stage in the voyaging. That would be the period when scurvy would make itself apparent because everybody on the ship would be living on preserved foods. In preserved food there are no vitamins, so a variety of nutritional diseases would be likely: lack of vitamin B1 would cause beriberi; no vitamin B3 would cause pellagra; and vitamin C, of course, scurvy."
Scurvy was thought to be infectious because "all" sailors where getting it. Until someone discovered that it was "environmental".
I'm not completely sold on the idea that all disease is the result of environmental factors, which the author states may be poor nutrition, toxins, electromagnetic fields, and resonant frequencies. A big hole for me is the Native American population that was decimated before the arrival of the Pilgrims. That spanned a whole continent, but the author blames it on disrupted salt trade.
But I do agree with eating healthier and avoiding unnecessary EMF.
I'm going to need some clarification on this one.
It is to my understanding that germ theory states that disease is caused by microscopic "organisms" which include bacteria and viruses. And that these multiply in infected individuals, and those infected individuals can then spread those bacteria and viruses to others.
I think we've all observed one person getting sick with something, and then spreading that to others in close proximity who then get sick.
Which part of germ theory is the hoax?
It's hard to summarize in an accurate manner, but start by looking into pasteur vs bechamp when "germ theory" was first being published. Bechamps "terrain theory" surmises that disease is primarily from a weakened or compromised immune system that no longer fights off bacterial, parasitic, or fungal infections.
Sounds similar to germ theory until you look into it and realize that viruses can not be transferred from one organism to another without being injected directly into the blood. Viruses are basically a natural process of cells shedding waste, they're not "alive." In other words, germ theory is a hoax because people don't transmit illnesses to each other like we're told, except in a case of bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infections for obvious reasons.
Also it's important to note that there are two times in the year most people get sick: "flu season", and "allergy season." It can certainly appear that illnesses spread during times where most people naturally "get sick" or "detox."
Didn't Daniel Palmer, father of chiropractic, put forth the anti-germ theory of disease?? Scientists used to believe in 'spontaneous generation' also.
Some thoughts: That seems to be why ivermectin is so effective- it’s neutralising parasites. HCQ has been proven to be an effective antifungal. And there are many proven antibacterials such as colloidal silver, echinacea, oregano oil, olive leaf extract, even honey.
You are confusing viruses and bacteria. Viruses are little more than DNA packages which need other organisms in order to reproduce. Bacteria are one-celled life forms that can survive on their own and multiply on their own as long as they have access to water, nutrients, etc. In general, I always heard "germs" in reference to bacteria, not viruses. So germ theory is not a hoax, no matter what viruses are or do.
Look into terrain theory. From what I understand it is the belief that bacteria/viruses do not cause disease themselves. They are merely attracted to an already dysfunctional/diseased tissue and they will replicate there, but it is not these bacteria/viruses themselves causing the pathogenesis. I'm not sure I believe it either, but I have seen some doctors who do. Since 90-99% of everything we learned in school is bullshit, I would actually probably lean on the side of germ theory also being bullshit as well, just statistically. God bless all my fellow Patriots. WWG1WGA!
The situation you question is due to "bio-resonance" between people that co-exist within similar toxic environments, similar air, food, water, etc. This situation is exacerbated in the winter months when people don't get outdoors, fresh air, etc. nearly as often. Greater alcohol consumption during colder months is also a major contributor.
If you step back and think it though, you'll note that the vast majority of the time, this did NOT happen, where only one person in a family, office, school, etc. was ill.
Germ theory is complete hoax beginning to end. Contagion is a myth. Viruses don't exist (as defined by mainstream medicine) and have never been "isolated". Bacteria are scavengers, clean-up crews. There have been over 70 studies, primarily undertaken from 1900-1950, that have attempted to prove contagion by "alleged viruses" or bacteria. All of them failed miserably. This is why you can't find any studies after 1950 even attempting to prove "human to human transmission".
You can waste your time reading modern studies where scientists inject various toxic cocktails into rats, guinea pigs, mice, etc. and buy it if you like. But the simple truth is, when you inject ANYTHING into the bloodstream and sterile environment of the body, it causes problems. That's why they vax us.
But you'll never find any studies with "sick people" infecting "healthy people" via sneezing on each other, coughing on each other, ingesting a sick person's saliva/mucous, sharing silverware, drinking/eating from same glasses/plates, etc. It never works, never has, and they don't even try anymore. Precisely because, contagion is a myth and germ theory is a hoax.
Chicken pox and measles are a different story entirely. These are childhood upgrade events that are POSITIVE in nature and BENEFIT the child through their entire lifetime. This is a classic example of bio-resonance. One hundred years ago, women were wise to host "chicken pox parties". Establishment medicine destroyed this motherly wisdom, as with everything else.
When I was growing up in the 50's my mom had all of us eat off of each other's plates so we would all come down with Chicken pox, Mumps or the Measles at the same time (I was one of 6 kids). She wanted to make sure we all got it when we were younger rather than go sterile from mumps or measles at an older age or to be sicker later on. All of these are typically easy to get over when you are a kid. I never heard of anyone dying from them at the time I was growing up but I suspect there may have always been a rare person who did. So I never understood the reason to vax for these kids illnesses. Was it to keep them from being sick for a week to 10 days so a working mom or dad wouldn't have to stay home with them?
My mom said she wouldn't have even known that I got Chicken pox when I was 2 because I got a very mild form of it. Two spots on my butt that I walked around scratching.
I had all those diseases as a kid and am completely immune for life now. No need for any vax for these shots and for all purposes no need for any boosters bc the shots for them don't always work.
Exactly. We're living in an inverted reality. Establishment medicine is at peak inversion now. None of these so-called "diseases" are harmful in any way. There are several studies proving that children who get them are far healthier adults across the board.
The "reason" for all these vaccines is to cause long-term health issues and lifelong customers of the pharma industry - plain and simple.
Mainstream medicine labels everything a "disease", when in fact, these symptoms (aka bumps/pox) are signs of healing in every regard.
Your mom was intuitively wise. Hopefully you[ll pass this wisdom on to all you know.
Flus are detoxification events. When the body detoxes, it recruits all energies to perform the detox as quickly as possible. So rather than 10-days, 2/3/4 weeks of "detoxing", while still maintaining a relatively normal lifestyle, the body saps all your energy which forces you to rest.
Unfortunately, this thing labeled "ConVid-1984" is a bit more complex. Nobody likes the explanation I believe is most accurate but I'll share it anyway. This "disease" is actually a re-balancing and alignment event. Those that are weak, in poor health, breathe too shallowly, lack proper sleep and/or live a life of non-stop activity are the most likely to "get sick". In short, they need more oxygen, relaxation and presence in their lives. If you evaluate the symptoms carefully, you'll see that this "illness" forces them to get exactly this.
If you're interested in reading a good book on the topic, you can find Dr. Tom Cowan's "The Contagion Myth" on alternative book platforms. Everything is explained in great detail.
Cheers to your mom!
This. This is exactly why, when Covid was first announced, I tried to get it myself so I could give it to my wife and kids and we would be done with the whole thing.
Guess what?? I couldn't even catch a case. It took a few months before I realized there was no pandemic.
My mom had a chicken pox party in 1987, my brother got it and they got together all the cousins, set up Atari, or coleco however that's spelled and let us all hang out, I was six... All I really remember after that was calamine lotion and oatmeal baths😒 thanks mom.
Awesome. Agree entirely
The idea that the body is a deterministic system, like a car, and that the outcomes of this system are purely dependent on physical inputs (ignoring the mind completely).
This leads to beliefs like that the body will fall apart unless you take it to a mechanic; that health is not something you create; that you need to get injected with health from the outside, and that you desperately need doctors for survival.
None of these ideas are true, and they are in fact highly detrimental.
He is probably talking about the theory that cold, flu etc... are not caused by "infection" but by "environmental" factors. For example:
https://theinfectiousmyth.com/index2.php
This guy died last year of Cancer. All of his published papers were purged after this.
Specifically about Covid you have: https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
Another book is:
The Contagion Myth. http://stateofthenation.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/The_Contagion_Myth_Why_Viruses_Including_Coronavirus_Are_Not_the_Cause_of_Disease_by_Thomas_S._Cowan_Sally_Fallon_Morell.pdf
This is probably the book the anon is basing because it uses the same terminology. For example the first chapter of this books is: Part 1: EXPOSING THE GERM THEORY
This is addressed in this last book around page 69. Search for "when these aboriginal peoples first met the European colonists? Didn’t they begin to suffer from infectious disease".
The book uses "scurvy" as an example to this. You can go to another source, for example: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/scurvy-disease-discovery-jonathan-lamb
"An estimated two million seamen died of scurvy during those years. These are the centuries where people are first crossing the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean, and the Pacific, and the problem incident to all of those voyages was that you were going to be at sea continuously, probably for more than three months, at some stage in the voyaging. That would be the period when scurvy would make itself apparent because everybody on the ship would be living on preserved foods. In preserved food there are no vitamins, so a variety of nutritional diseases would be likely: lack of vitamin B1 would cause beriberi; no vitamin B3 would cause pellagra; and vitamin C, of course, scurvy."
Scurvy was thought to be infectious because "all" sailors where getting it. Until someone discovered that it was "environmental".
This was a fascinating read. Thank you.
I'm not completely sold on the idea that all disease is the result of environmental factors, which the author states may be poor nutrition, toxins, electromagnetic fields, and resonant frequencies. A big hole for me is the Native American population that was decimated before the arrival of the Pilgrims. That spanned a whole continent, but the author blames it on disrupted salt trade.
But I do agree with eating healthier and avoiding unnecessary EMF.