Definitely could be why they are freaking about getting every1 jabbed. It would be much more obvious if only 50% of the country is jabbed and only the vaxxed die and get sick and the unvaxxed are all good in the hood.
Two things - by 2025, Hillary would be, like, 105yo, and she was already sick by the 2016 election. When does she give up? and, second, where does the theory that 'Hillary is a double' fit in with the thought of her being picked as VP upon Joe's ouster?
Dr. Jane Ruby dug into the data released with today's FDA approval...
It says side-effect risk increases 10x on shot two, vs. shot one (makes you wonder how horrific shot three will be!)
Also says that shots given from December '20 thru March '21 have 50% rate of placebos given. So this is an experiment with a control group, after all.
What she didn't clarify, or maybe she doesn't know....
If you're on record of getting the placebo shot (by lot #) on your first shot, then do you also get it on your second shot?
Why is the data only thru March '21? Is that when they submitted the data for FDA approval, and it hasn't been updated? Did the placebos stop after March? Who knows.
Just to be clear, I personally haven't read the data, I'm just posting what she said in the interview.
I remember reading a post the other day on here that said that a huge percentage of deaths and debilitating, adverse effects came from specific lot #'s of the batches.
Hmmm. From what I understood, the placebos were only given in the trial groups.
You have to give written consent to be in trial groups, and be made aware that you might get a placebo.
I have a neighbor who was in the trial group and she's angry because she was lead to believe that, after the vaccine was approved, she would be notified if she had been in the placebo group (so she could get the real shot if she wanted).
She's saying that they're now wanting the trial participants to wait another 2 or 3 years before letting them know if they got the placebo or not.
So 50/50 from Dec 2020 to March 2021. That's some gamble! I'm guessing it was done on purpose so that the amount of single shot people didn't all get sick at the same time, then lead back to the first round of shots?
Definitely could be why they are freaking about getting every1 jabbed. It would be much more obvious if only 50% of the country is jabbed and only the vaxxed die and get sick and the unvaxxed are all good in the hood.
Don't forget that vaxxes weren't meant to happen until 2025, after all 'she was never meant to lose'.
Two things - by 2025, Hillary would be, like, 105yo, and she was already sick by the 2016 election. When does she give up? and, second, where does the theory that 'Hillary is a double' fit in with the thought of her being picked as VP upon Joe's ouster?
Yes that's what I think they done it for also. It would be to obvious if suddenly, early on, people with only one shot suddenly started to fall over!
Dr. Jane Ruby dug into the data released with today's FDA approval...
It says side-effect risk increases 10x on shot two, vs. shot one (makes you wonder how horrific shot three will be!)
Also says that shots given from December '20 thru March '21 have 50% rate of placebos given. So this is an experiment with a control group, after all.
What she didn't clarify, or maybe she doesn't know....
Just to be clear, I personally haven't read the data, I'm just posting what she said in the interview.
I remember reading a post the other day on here that said that a huge percentage of deaths and debilitating, adverse effects came from specific lot #'s of the batches.
Extrapolate that out.
If shot one is 0% (which its not)
And shot 2 is 10%
Than shot 3 is 100% effective with side effects (death most likely)
And they're pushing it for the 'most vulnerable' people first. How cruel.
If the placebo's are recorded,then the nurses are complicent as well.
I don't suppose there's a link to the documentation you mentioned available somewhere? It would be interesting to do a dive.
Wish I could find this info in the FDA release tho :(
She said it's on the package insert data.
Hmmm. From what I understood, the placebos were only given in the trial groups.
You have to give written consent to be in trial groups, and be made aware that you might get a placebo.
I have a neighbor who was in the trial group and she's angry because she was lead to believe that, after the vaccine was approved, she would be notified if she had been in the placebo group (so she could get the real shot if she wanted).
She's saying that they're now wanting the trial participants to wait another 2 or 3 years before letting them know if they got the placebo or not.
She is PISSED.
Kind of a Russian Roulette. The more shots you get ...
So 50/50 from Dec 2020 to March 2021. That's some gamble! I'm guessing it was done on purpose so that the amount of single shot people didn't all get sick at the same time, then lead back to the first round of shots?
possibly giving dems placebo and using kill shot to target opponents?
I’d take it if I knew it was a placebo