I can see both sides on this - she’s not entirely wrong. These lies ideally need to be destroyed with truth (and through military tribunals, where that truth can be presented in the Orwellian dystopia that the Democrats brought about as soon as they could), not government mandates.
Now please calm down. You can certainly be outraged by what we’re seeing around us, but by your vicious anger and your consequential forsaking of principles and reason, your tormentors evidently seem to now own you. I hope you can recognize the destructive irony, and the demonic strategy, in that.
Depends on how far they take it. If they just say you need need to be va😵 with coof juice, a) ok, but they should bear responsibility for adverse reactions, b) but if they demand to see some sort of government issued/supported, hell no.
So that’s another two things I think governors can and should go after:
they should do everything in their power to make liability for vaccine side-effects a financial concern for any business in the state that wants to mandate
vaccine passports are an unmitigated abomination of medical privacy invasion, and should be illegal in every states.
The problem is the way people are framing the argument. Banning companies from requiring it is the wrong perspective. She is correct that dictating what private companies can and can not do is a slippery slope. The field there is too wide open for later abuse.
Instead, we should be protecting the right to work of individuals who do not want to take it. This country has a long history of outlawing discriminatory practices in hiring. Looked at this way, it is a very small addition to an already well established cultural mandate. No slope to worry about. It is a flat plane. If you already can't discriminate on basis of religion, why should you be allowed to discriminate on the basis of participation in gene therapy experiments?
There are already supposed to be religious exemptions. We only need to clarify that companies must grant those exemptions to those who do not want the jab.
Can you mandate that people smoke cigarettes all day long, as an employer? The problem with allowing this is that the "vaccine" is still in clinical trials, long term side effects are unknown and also has a slight side effect of DEATH. Companies should not be able to require a condition of employment something which may cause people to die.
She also opposed a bill in Feb 2020 that would prohibit schools from mandating a vaccine. "You can work elsewhere", "You can learn elsewhere", "You can shop elsewhere" does not stand up logically if what is being mandated has a side effect of DEATH and other terrible outcomes, with long term effects unknown.
Not planning at this time...( = Subject to change depending on the situation).
So far, from what I read, she understands the difference in application of executive orders, meaning, they relate to public institutions and employees.
Every commercial entity can negotiate with you the terms of employment.
Transgressions against your rights is up to you to counter.
If a company wants to play idiot, they will be " ausradiert" or taken of the board by declining sales and lack of employees, and stiffening competition. Talk about a nice " endlösung". ( It is both final solution but also redemption, and that latter part is hidden from you unless you translate the word yourself. Lying by ommision)
If a company wants to play idiot, they will be " ausradiert" or taken of the board by declining sales and lack of employees, and stiffening competition.
Twitter’s doing fantastic in all of the above, thanks.
Yeah lets bash relentlessly one of the only Governors that believes the gubment should stay the fuck out of peoples business. No one is making you work or shop at any business. Stop whining you fucking pussies and maybe focus on the other 45+ governors that actually suck. This board has been completely over run. Thats ok though you fucking commies, you can forum slide all you want but there will be no deals. That includes you.
She also opposed a bill in Feb 2020 that would prohibit schools from mandating a vaccine. "You can work elsewhere", "You can learn elsewhere", "You can shop elsewhere" does not stand up logically if what is being mandated has a side effect of DEATH and other terrible outcomes, with long term effects unknown.
Of course it stands up logically. If people shop elsewhere the business will be no more. If you learn elsewhere then the school will be no more. The fact its a possibly serious side effect makes it MORE logical to not comply. If you havent noticed by now, The Great Awakening, isnt about telling the govt to make more rules. Its about the people realizing WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT and as soon as we the people decide something does not serve to benefit the people then it stops when we say it does.
Do you think there are infinite businesses and schools? There are only so many non-mandate schools available for students within a district and travelling hours each way may not be feasible for everyone, and is an unnecessary burden particularly to middle and lower class people who cannot simply uproot their lives, mortgages etc.
PUBLIC schools are well within the purview of government, and Noem has the power and obligation to safeguard her constituents against medical tyranny.
Well sorry if its inconvenient to not work somewhere that wants u too take a vax to keep your job or to not send your kids to a school that requires a mask. Im not arguing for or against Noem. Im saying that relying on the govt to make the rules is how we got here to begin with. The govt is not going to save us from the private sector. The simple fact is that if we as a group decide to make a move, the businesses and schools will follow US, not the other way around.
Just a sidenote. The Great Awakening is going to get infinitely more inconvenient as we go, not less. The sooner we accept that the better.
Govt has the RESPONSIBILITY of protecting the rights of the People. That is one of its core functions. If that requires passing a bill so that our medical rights are not infringed, then that is a NECESSARY FUNCTION of small govt.
Never trust a "conservative" with plastic surgery on her face
I can see both sides on this - she’s not entirely wrong. These lies ideally need to be destroyed with truth (and through military tribunals, where that truth can be presented in the Orwellian dystopia that the Democrats brought about as soon as they could), not government mandates.
She’s actually not.
I took the time to respond to your own post that your rage about this post evidently prompted:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwaMXHs8/x/c/4JDFKRqWm4X
Now please calm down. You can certainly be outraged by what we’re seeing around us, but by your vicious anger and your consequential forsaking of principles and reason, your tormentors evidently seem to now own you. I hope you can recognize the destructive irony, and the demonic strategy, in that.
Is it a mandate though? I see it as a matter of medical privacy and civil rights.
Depends on how far they take it. If they just say you need need to be va😵 with coof juice, a) ok, but they should bear responsibility for adverse reactions, b) but if they demand to see some sort of government issued/supported, hell no.
So that’s another two things I think governors can and should go after:
she is crazy
A private business can loss if customers don’t buy. We need to not shop at any place that make their employees wear a mask.
That's a start. But we have no way of knowing whether they require vaccines or not.
The problem is the way people are framing the argument. Banning companies from requiring it is the wrong perspective. She is correct that dictating what private companies can and can not do is a slippery slope. The field there is too wide open for later abuse.
Instead, we should be protecting the right to work of individuals who do not want to take it. This country has a long history of outlawing discriminatory practices in hiring. Looked at this way, it is a very small addition to an already well established cultural mandate. No slope to worry about. It is a flat plane. If you already can't discriminate on basis of religion, why should you be allowed to discriminate on the basis of participation in gene therapy experiments?
There are already supposed to be religious exemptions. We only need to clarify that companies must grant those exemptions to those who do not want the jab.
Can you mandate that people smoke cigarettes all day long, as an employer? The problem with allowing this is that the "vaccine" is still in clinical trials, long term side effects are unknown and also has a slight side effect of DEATH. Companies should not be able to require a condition of employment something which may cause people to die.
She also opposed a bill in Feb 2020 that would prohibit schools from mandating a vaccine. "You can work elsewhere", "You can learn elsewhere", "You can shop elsewhere" does not stand up logically if what is being mandated has a side effect of DEATH and other terrible outcomes, with long term effects unknown.
Totally, right!
Not planning at this time...( = Subject to change depending on the situation).
So far, from what I read, she understands the difference in application of executive orders, meaning, they relate to public institutions and employees.
Every commercial entity can negotiate with you the terms of employment.
Transgressions against your rights is up to you to counter.
If a company wants to play idiot, they will be " ausradiert" or taken of the board by declining sales and lack of employees, and stiffening competition. Talk about a nice " endlösung". ( It is both final solution but also redemption, and that latter part is hidden from you unless you translate the word yourself. Lying by ommision)
That is a free market.
Twitter’s doing fantastic in all of the above, thanks.
Yeah lets bash relentlessly one of the only Governors that believes the gubment should stay the fuck out of peoples business. No one is making you work or shop at any business. Stop whining you fucking pussies and maybe focus on the other 45+ governors that actually suck. This board has been completely over run. Thats ok though you fucking commies, you can forum slide all you want but there will be no deals. That includes you.
She also opposed a bill in Feb 2020 that would prohibit schools from mandating a vaccine. "You can work elsewhere", "You can learn elsewhere", "You can shop elsewhere" does not stand up logically if what is being mandated has a side effect of DEATH and other terrible outcomes, with long term effects unknown.
Of course it stands up logically. If people shop elsewhere the business will be no more. If you learn elsewhere then the school will be no more. The fact its a possibly serious side effect makes it MORE logical to not comply. If you havent noticed by now, The Great Awakening, isnt about telling the govt to make more rules. Its about the people realizing WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT and as soon as we the people decide something does not serve to benefit the people then it stops when we say it does.
Do you think there are infinite businesses and schools? There are only so many non-mandate schools available for students within a district and travelling hours each way may not be feasible for everyone, and is an unnecessary burden particularly to middle and lower class people who cannot simply uproot their lives, mortgages etc.
PUBLIC schools are well within the purview of government, and Noem has the power and obligation to safeguard her constituents against medical tyranny.
Well sorry if its inconvenient to not work somewhere that wants u too take a vax to keep your job or to not send your kids to a school that requires a mask. Im not arguing for or against Noem. Im saying that relying on the govt to make the rules is how we got here to begin with. The govt is not going to save us from the private sector. The simple fact is that if we as a group decide to make a move, the businesses and schools will follow US, not the other way around.
Just a sidenote. The Great Awakening is going to get infinitely more inconvenient as we go, not less. The sooner we accept that the better.
Govt has the RESPONSIBILITY of protecting the rights of the People. That is one of its core functions. If that requires passing a bill so that our medical rights are not infringed, then that is a NECESSARY FUNCTION of small govt.