Isn't a CEO mandating their employees get vaxxed...practicing medicine w/o a license?
⚠️ Vax-tarded ⚠️
Title says it all. Can we do anything with that?
No. It is the responsibility of the CEO to ensure that they provide a safe workplace environment for their employees.
Before you downvote me into the sub-basement hear me out.
Most businesses are terrified of lawsuits. The company I work for went through hell for a decade because of a frivolous lawsuit of a technical nature and eventually settled because there was no way the judge could understand it. It is a small business and the company was devastated by it.
Businesses are going to be looking for the safest place to hide from potential company-killing lawsuits. Their lawyers are going to be telling them to follow CDC, NIH, WHO guidance because they would form the ultimate defense if some employee dies of a covid-19.
On the flip side, they risk lawsuits if they mandate the jab, and an employee dies from it. However, the employee had a choice, and signed the consent form saying they know that there is a risk.
Which position is the most scary for a business?
IMHO the way out of this is not to whine about businesses, but to move public opinion about the vaccine, and call the CDC out on their bullshit.
The truth is that the vaccine is failing badly. It has only a slight benefit as far as preventing death from Covid-19, and a much greater risk than getting infected by the virus itself.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwaNeJLW/new-health-data-released-by-publ/
So what I'm trying to say is that CEOs are wrong to mandate the vaccine, but that most of them are only trying to thread their way through this nightmare. Our real enemy is not them, it is Big Pharma, the Deep State, and the shadowy figures that are running this entire plandemic.
We should definitely fight back against Vaccine mandates though.
If your company demands it, say you will only consider getting the jab if it is specifically FDA approved. The FDA has only given approval to the ghost product 'Comirnaty' which they don't actually manufacture. The product that is availble from Pfizer is still under Emergency Use Authorization and is not approved.
FWIW, it IS provable that one employee's vaccination will have exactly zero influence on another employee getting covid: Following the Science
Mandating vax should not provide any legal insulation at all, because it doesn't provide any medical insulation.
For anyone that has had covid, it appears your natural immunity is far better than the jab. Drop this report on the CEO's desk and walk out.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwaMVuUb/-large-sample-study-shows-natura/
Thank you 😊
I was actually thinking that if my company mandates it (hasn't yet), to draw up a legal document to have the CEO sign making the company legally liable to me and my family if I experience debilitating side effects / death from the Jab.
Essentially, you are requiring this medical procedure as a NEW requirement for my employment. Well, ok. But I am demanding that you as a person and a company, take full legal and financial responsibility for your mandate.
But I do like the argument below equating it to a company demanding that all (natural) female employees take birth control. Perfect. I may have to use that if it comes up.
And then you died.
... Not a great strategy.
The birth control one is a bit weak, as they would counter with "that is not for a contagious disease". So a better counter is to ask them to produce the documentation that demonstrates isolation of the virus (this does not exist), a description of the ingredients in the vaccine (this does not exist), a long-term double-blind peer reviewed test of the efficacy and safety of the vaccine (this does not exist), and the FDA approval of this vaccine (this does not exist). They should also point out in your employment contract where they can force you to take a medical treatment (this does not exist), and especially an experimental medical treatment (this does not exist), and explain to you how requiring your disclosure of your medical information does not violate HIPAA laws (it does violate HIPAA laws).
If you can work from home, the compromise could be that from now on you will work from home until the policy changes. If you cannot work from home you need to NOT QUIT, and force them to fire you, so you can collect unemployment and sue them for wrongful termination. If they fire a bunch of you, start a class action lawsuit against them and that will absolutely TERRIFY them. But be aware that a class action can take 10+ years.
With this stuff the best approach seems to me to be to come on HARD and demonstrate you are not a pussy and know your rights and want EVERYTHING in writing (this will send the right message), respond with letters that are written by you plus a lawyer (this will scare them), and try to exit with the biggest settlement and go get a better job at a non-mandate place.
IANAL.
Not for nothing but my doc sent me a list of ingredients for all three jabs I'm not a doc so I can't vouch for it being authentic lots of words j can't pronounce but they all have cholesterol in them
They're not admitting that graphene oxide is one of the ingredients
They also all have "murdered girl" in them too.
https://www.cbruk.org/dontforgetjohanna https://www.cbruk.org/what_the_hek https://bmcmolcellbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2121-12-23
There is no published document outlining all of the ingredients, of any of these "vaccines".
Or they could just make employees sign a document indicating that they are aware that no one will be required to take the vaccine. They can decide to take it or not. It you don’t like medical freedom, you can be the one to leave.
As for people who claim that we need vaccines to protect grandma, it looks like these vaccines have to potential to create Typhoid Marys.
I disagree. If they encourage it, provide time off for vaccination and follow CDC guidelines how could they get sued? I am also sure the company I work for has enough money to shell out, and lawyers on deck that getting sued is the least of their concern.
Also, since when did following CDC mean mandating a vaccine? There is not a vaccine mandate.
What I think is happening for larger companies is the government threatening to pull contracts and favors from these guys if they don’t fall in line.
And then when the FraudDeathAgency approves this and other injections................then what? Better to say NO the first time and, as you said, go after the lying CDC and FDA and the rest.
They never will. The emergency use authorization has the legal liability shield.
Big Pharma can't sell their vaccines without that because 1 in 500 of the jabbed have bad reactions.