List of Basic Decode Comms
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (79)
sorted by:
u/dty6 u/wideawakeuk u/sleepydude
I need to delve into this deeper, as there's a lot here, but here's a quick shower thought on the Hurricane Dorian part:
Who is the most famous Dorian? Dorian Gray
"The Picture of Dorian Gray" by Oscar Wilde
What is this story about? A man who never grows older.
Who doesn't grow older? People who consume adrenochrome.
Where is the hurricane stemming from? The Caribbean
What happens in the Caribbean? Child Trafficking.
I've read that the military has been involved in trafficking, so is this where the USS Alabama ties in??
USS Alabama (SSBN 731) is a "boomer" submarine (as opposed to a fast-attack sub) Boomers are the ones with the nukes that go out into the ocean and hide, basically waiting for the order to "press the red button." There are two crews on a boomer that take turns going out to sea.
" USS Alabama Completes 100th Patrol, June 17, 2021"
Commanding Officers:
Blue Crew - Cmdr Brian Murphy
Gold Crew - Cmdr John Thorpe
https://www.csp.navy.mil/alabama/
Very interesting dig. I'm also wondering if the pic was of the USS Alabama or something else. It's so hard to see it, but Trump clearly wanted it seen from how clearly he touched and looked down at it during the video of him talking about Hurricane Dorian.
The Picture of Dorian Gray is an interesting idea.
Great dig on the USS Alabama.
What also do you think about all the absurd stuff about Trump ripping documents apart, shoving them down pipes, and then handing them over taped back together to the National Archive? It's insane. No regular person would ever believe such a crazy story.
BTW: The Picture of Dorian Gray is an interesting tale, if you've never read it.
Here's a brief synopsis:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Picture-of-Dorian-Gray-novel-by-Wilde
Thanks!
I'm still digesting Trump's ripping of documents. I haven't completely figured this one out yet. I've got to let this one percolate for a bit. There are a lot of questions in my mind surrounding the "documents." Whose documents? Trump's or the DS's? What, exactly, is meant by "documents?" Do we take this literally, or is this some sort of comm? Why are they being flushed down the toilet? Clogging the toilet? What is really the National Archive's role in all of this? Friend or foe?
I don't think we should take it literally. It's an absurd claim by Maggie Hasserman. It's a comm in my opinion. It's made to be absurd so that no one will take it seriously. Trump's base will roll their eyes and think "fake news". It's basically only meant to be understand by those who read comms. Everyone else will disregard. The only will believe it and not see as a comm are the ones who are brainwashed to hate Trump and who don't understand comms.
Evidence = feces.
Decode blog talks about that one a lot.
I wrote in my main post my theory on what the National Archive was doing. This was my theory on it, I'm not sure if you caught it so I'll repost here:
Sorry, I guess I didn't make myself clear on this:
"What, exactly, is meant by "documents?" Do we take this literally, or is this some sort of comm?"
What I meant was, is this comms regarding certain documents, either the DS's or Trump's.
Or
Does the term, "document," have another meaning, just like water = information.
document = ??
You're going about it a little wrong in the table in the OP.
You can't just 1:1 assign definitions to things. That's why in my posts I go into such detail to explain why the symbol means what it does.
Understand, if you could just 1:1 cipher swap out the terms then a computer can decode it.
The design of this language is such that it is only discernable by an active mind full of references, natural understanding, and the ability to make leaps in logic.
The goal is to maintain plausible deniability -- so they can say "Oh, you're just nuts and reading into things too much. It's all just coincidence."
That aside, with the topic on hand of Trump flushing papers, you have to understand their point of view first.
Let me just put out what I think is going on in these comms and work back from there:
Trump is destroying blackmail evidence.
Yeah, you heard me, he actually is destroying evidence.
But not of his own wrongdoing.
He is literally freeing people from their blackmail -- he is taking their chains off.
The documents he is flushing are all the evidence and proof the Cabal has on their own members.
He is freeing the slaves by destroying the chains that hold them.
And it isn't the first time he's done so.
https://qalerts.app/?n=659
Jan 31, 2018
Effective yesterday, while standing under the statue of FREEDOM, POTUS FREED those ‘good’ people who are currently being blackmailed, threatened and enslaved.
Those who stood chanting “USA” were FREED.
The shot heard around the world.
TG>
WE, THE PEOPLE.
FREEDOM DAY.
LIGHT.
Q
He's about two weeks too late for the Delta, but my bet is he just freed a lot of people just like he did in 2018.
Trump is forgiving people of their sins so long as they flip to the good side.
This is good news.
Statue of Freedom:
"The crowning feature of the Dome of the U.S. Capitol stands 19 feet 6 inches tall and weighs approximately 15,000 pounds."
https://www.aoc.gov/explore-capitol-campus/art/statue-freedom
So, Trump was standing in the U.S. Capitol when he freed the good people.
Yeah, and if he did it just now at Mar a Lago...
Where is the US Capitol right now?
Ah, good point!
"The design of this language is such that it is only discernable by an active mind full of references, natural understanding, and the ability to make leaps in logic."
To this I would add that establishing our little comms group strengthens us all in regards to our decoding. We all come from differing backgrounds, differing skill sets, and differing experiences and knowledge. Thus, we have the ability to throw out all sorts of ideas and consider a broader range of interpretations than what we could by simply working on our own.
Much of what we do, I believe, is intuitive. There's a certain "feel" for comms. Sometimes individual bits seem to make sense, but then the overall interpretation just doesn't "feel" right. When it does feel right, it all just "clicks" and you get a certain sense of satisfaction in the interpretation. At least, this is the way it works for me.
I just want to say that I'm learning a lot from everyone and it's helping me to "up my comms game."
Same. We sometimes come from radically different points of view on comms. That is a good thing. One person can be stumped, but then another remembers a different meaning of the word and that can cause a sort of ping-pong as we bounce around what it could mean. It's harder for us since we are not the ciphers writing these. We are the ones attempting to decipher which means we have to figure out what the cipher was thinking and where the connections are.
That's an interesting interpretation. I hadn't thought of it in those terms before.