Also gonna piggy back off this top comment to share one correction:
This bacteria strain is NOT rare NOR is it difficult to find. it’s found all over the place. It just doesn’t need to be rediscovered because after finding a single sample you can extract tons of what you need from it. This bacteria grows in nature in marshes and grasslands. For example, below is a study where they used various soil samples from Pakistan where they found streptomyces avermitilis
Pika is when preg women crave dirt and there is a whole "grounding movement" of discharging emfs from your body with electrically grounded mats and blankets. Pretty dumb unless you can't go walk barefoot outside.
Pika is when preg women crave dirt and there is a whole "grounding movement" of discharging emfs from your body with electrically grounded mats and blankets. Pretty dumb unless you can't go walk barefoot outside.
I have already conceded that the author was incorrect and if you read your own study, you'd have seen that they only 50 Isolates were identified from their samples in very specific soil conditions, and only 10 for study.
The 10 selected isolates were identified as the avermectin-producing strain by fermentation and characterized on ISP2 medium for aerial and reverse side mycelia color, soluble pigment color and melanin formation, in comparison with S. avermitilis DSM 41445. The best avermectin-producing isolate S1-C (10.15 mg/L) showed similar result as S. avermitilis DSM 41445, when subjected for culture characteristics analysis in different media along with biochemical characterization.
I would absolutely considered that rare and furthermore, only part of the point of the post.
If you can find where S. avermitilis that meet all of the very particular criteria of the 10 individual bacterium selected above are plentiful, please share.
If not, stop derailing, as we both know that was only a fraction of the point of the article.
It’s disinfo. “Never found again” does not equal “rare.” Furthermore, seeking out specific soil samples in Pakistan does not confirm that this specific strain of bacteria is rare. It just means they found it in these particular samples. They’ve determined that there are many environments where these strains can be found, so to assume that in these samples (and the golf course in Japan) are now the ONLY places where this can be found just because they are the ONLY places YOU are aware of is short sighted.
Nobody is claiming it is rare other than you, and you seem to base this only off the the OP’s article which has been proven false. I’m not sure how else you’d come to the conclusion that this strain of bacteria is super rare
Disinfo in an article written pre-plandemic? That"s called a mistake, faggot. Showing one article that they found TEN bacterium that meet the correct criteria is the actual definition of disinfo. Yes, it a rare are and the article you didn't read proves it. Didn't read the rest of your post because I have no time for shilling. You did gud though, boy. Hope the pharma fags give you double shekels for effort.
Piggybacking off the top comment... Ivermectin is a wonder drug and also very cheap. Why would Big Pharma not want you to have it? Maybe so they can push the clot shot and have the government pay they LOADS OF MONEY for it? If you need support, and want to learn Ivermectin and your options, use the guide:
The bacteria had information that could lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton
Streptomyces avermictilis didn't kill itself
No autophages in the Clinton pages?
Also gonna piggy back off this top comment to share one correction:
This bacteria strain is NOT rare NOR is it difficult to find. it’s found all over the place. It just doesn’t need to be rediscovered because after finding a single sample you can extract tons of what you need from it. This bacteria grows in nature in marshes and grasslands. For example, below is a study where they used various soil samples from Pakistan where they found streptomyces avermitilis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217667/
It's not something that nobody has been able to find again. The writer of this blog may not have done their proper research
So does this mean that eating dirt can be healthy?
No. Don't do that.
I'm gonna do it anyways.
Pika is when preg women crave dirt and there is a whole "grounding movement" of discharging emfs from your body with electrically grounded mats and blankets. Pretty dumb unless you can't go walk barefoot outside.
Pika is when preg women crave dirt and there is a whole "grounding movement" of discharging emfs from your body with electrically grounded mats and blankets. Pretty dumb unless you can't go walk barefoot outside.
As long as you realize almost everything in dirt is somethings shit, go ahead. Not the best idea though.
I have already conceded that the author was incorrect and if you read your own study, you'd have seen that they only 50 Isolates were identified from their samples in very specific soil conditions, and only 10 for study.
I would absolutely considered that rare and furthermore, only part of the point of the post.
If you can find where S. avermitilis that meet all of the very particular criteria of the 10 individual bacterium selected above are plentiful, please share.
If not, stop derailing, as we both know that was only a fraction of the point of the article.
It’s disinfo. “Never found again” does not equal “rare.” Furthermore, seeking out specific soil samples in Pakistan does not confirm that this specific strain of bacteria is rare. It just means they found it in these particular samples. They’ve determined that there are many environments where these strains can be found, so to assume that in these samples (and the golf course in Japan) are now the ONLY places where this can be found just because they are the ONLY places YOU are aware of is short sighted.
Nobody is claiming it is rare other than you, and you seem to base this only off the the OP’s article which has been proven false. I’m not sure how else you’d come to the conclusion that this strain of bacteria is super rare
Disinfo in an article written pre-plandemic? That"s called a mistake, faggot. Showing one article that they found TEN bacterium that meet the correct criteria is the actual definition of disinfo. Yes, it a rare are and the article you didn't read proves it. Didn't read the rest of your post because I have no time for shilling. You did gud though, boy. Hope the pharma fags give you double shekels for effort.
Piggybacking off the top comment... Ivermectin is a wonder drug and also very cheap. Why would Big Pharma not want you to have it? Maybe so they can push the clot shot and have the government pay they LOADS OF MONEY for it? If you need support, and want to learn Ivermectin and your options, use the guide:
https://media.communities.win/post/tz5Bb4sW.jpeg
🤣