This is the Mirror. Birth Cert Fraud.
(kateofgaia.wordpress.com)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Admiralty Law, as far as I know. Never really looked into it, must give that a careful read. Thanks for posting.
https://smallchangebigprofits.com/learning-quantum-grammar-parse-syntax-part-one/
Additional info. Your hand-El reminds me of this every time I see it, coincidentally undying.
good info
Birth certificate deception and Sovereign citizens are 2 different things. Birth certificate deception is worth looking into, however it is excruciatingly complex by design. Sovereign appears to be a dead end, the point is, it is not the same thing, *Sovereign Citizens, try and use the Birth certificate deception in their arguments, but they use it incorrectly
Do not just ignore it. "Let he who is deceived, be deceived" an old maxim of Roman law. If you wish to be deceived for the rest of your life, and for your children to be deceived for the rest of theirs, then that is your choice.
Sovereign citizens are off course, as it appears that you cannot be a sovereign (IIRC) without meeting certain criteria, 1 of them being, owning or commanding a standing army, this is why the Queen of England for example can be a 'Sovereign'.
A better route to go down again, is birth certificate deception only (forget sovereign stuff), which is: Your birth certificate WAS registered as a Cestui Que Vie TRUST via the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 when you were born -> https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/18-19/11
You also need to have some knowledge of how Trust law works, and its all about who is (or being able to ascertain who is) the ADMINISTRATOR of your trust that was registered via your birth certificate when you were born. (Whether you believe it or not). The Administrator is one of the three legal parties in a Legal Trust, and in all cases is assumed to be the state unless you can successfully claim the role. And yes there are many things you can say without realizing it, which will immediately disqualify you from the role, and put you in your assumed role, which is the beneficiary of the Trust. The beneficiary of a TRUST does what the ADMINISTRATOR (or executor, different term for the same thing) says they must do
If you wish to learn more, you can start here: https://areweallreallyeducated.com/the-cestui-que-vie-birth-certificate-trust/
tHiS fLaG hAs GiLdED eDGES
taze
Just a recap what the theory of the Birth Certificate (Berth Certificate) fraud is:
(I say it theory since as you will see, it cannot be easily proven or disproven at least to my knowledge)
Lets start with what the constitution says about the Admiralty Law
This essentially states
Admiralty is a valid jurisdiction
What constitutes an Admiralty or maritime is not clearly defined
As per the constitution, scope of admiralty jurisdiction is not limited by what was under English Law (oceans, ships, captains, pirates etc)
The upshot is that, a judge may decide that maritime/admiralty laws exists in a particular case, if they can convince themselves that it somehow fits the maritime definition, which is not limited to Ships and Oceans.
So the theory goes, the construct used to bind us all under maritime law is by word play. The mother's womb is the ocean, and the child is berthed in the dock by the "dockter" and reported as presumed missing or lost at sea by signing the "Berth" Certificate, and at that point it becomes a property of the state under maritime salvage laws and this is denoted by putting the names in ALL CAPS in the Berth/Birth Certificate.
So any court, judge, official, bank who recognises this to be the correct interpretation can use maritime admiralty law in dealing with any person who has a birth certificate. They can treat people like chattel and buy them / sell them / use them as collateral via paper work. But these judges will not do this obvertly. So there is a dual system at play - the one that is shown to us and the one that is used by them. They just have to keep up the appearance.
So just as an example, if a person goes to the court and the judge decides this person has no claim of life since they are a maritime salvage due to birth certificate, they can rule against them - but they can give some arbitrary cover for their ruling in the form of their opinion, so people can say "Ah, thats the reason why this person lost their case".
If someone has a better explanation of how this works, I would love to hear.
This is something I've been meaning to look into for a while, thanks for all the info.
No probs, please share whatever you find. We have a lot of info from videos and articles by people who claim the fraud, but very rarely do I find the mechanics through which this deception is perpetrated. My intention is to collect all the actual legal means through which maritime law can be imposed on us, and what the implications are. This is probably just a beginning
My fellow Melburnian friend, not sure what the reason for your vitriol is. We come to this forum to discuss things - not all of those are tangible and written in the books.
I started my comment with this specific line "Just a recap what the theory of the Birth Certificate (Berth Certificate) fraud is", and it was intended especially for people such as yourself. It is a theory. Anyone who screams at someone for offering a theory loses my respect, because without being able to propose and discuss theories, meaningful discourse becomes impossible.
The only reason I am responding to you with civility is because we have crossed paths in the past and from what I remember, you are usually respectful and insightful, so I will look past this unwarranted aggression. Good day.
First thought...Obama Fraud.