I spent 8 hours in the ER with my daughter who had a scary reaction to the first dose of the Pfizer shot. She is REQUIRED to get it to keep her job as a pharmacy tech for a large health system even though she does not interface with patients. After 5 hours in a way too crowded waiting room full of sick people, she was finally given a bed in a hallway with a makeshift curtain. An hour later, when a doctor finally came in, he could barely listen to her concerns before dismissing her symptoms as being related to the vaccine. Over the next 2 hours, they did a CT scan and an EKG which they said showed nothing, although a few days later, when she read the notes, inflammation and fluid build up of the lining of her heart was noted. I mean, we can no longer trust the medical community to first do no harm. It was a very eye opening experience.
That's malpractice - incorrect interpretation of data and / or giving the patient incorrect diagnostic test result.
You definitely should sue and you'll win. At the very least this will go on that evil ER doc's record. File a complaint with the medical board - it will go on his permanent record.
They have liability protection, encoded in law, as long as they follow the protocol. A law that says no state or federal judge can challenge. If you do file a case, a three judge panel in DC will adjudicate.
"No court of the United States, or of any State, shall have subject matter jurisdiction to review, whether by mandamus or otherwise, any action by the Secretary under this subsection.
Check the definitions of "United States" and "State" in that law. I'll bet you dollars to donuts it only applies to DC and the federal territories. Just like the Internal Revenue Code.
26 USC 3121 (employment taxes)
(e) State, United States, and citizenFor purposes of this chapter—
(1) State
The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
(2) United States
The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
26 USC 4612 (a)(4)(A) United States
In general
The term “United States” means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
Under the false "justice" system, they may have liability protection. Under our rightful common law, they have none. That's just ONE reason why we must take back our grand and petit juries and restore our common law.
I spent 8 hours in the ER with my daughter who had a scary reaction to the first dose of the Pfizer shot. She is REQUIRED to get it to keep her job as a pharmacy tech for a large health system even though she does not interface with patients. After 5 hours in a way too crowded waiting room full of sick people, she was finally given a bed in a hallway with a makeshift curtain. An hour later, when a doctor finally came in, he could barely listen to her concerns before dismissing her symptoms as being related to the vaccine. Over the next 2 hours, they did a CT scan and an EKG which they said showed nothing, although a few days later, when she read the notes, inflammation and fluid build up of the lining of her heart was noted. I mean, we can no longer trust the medical community to first do no harm. It was a very eye opening experience.
That's malpractice - incorrect interpretation of data and / or giving the patient incorrect diagnostic test result.
You definitely should sue and you'll win. At the very least this will go on that evil ER doc's record. File a complaint with the medical board - it will go on his permanent record.
They have liability protection, encoded in law, as long as they follow the protocol. A law that says no state or federal judge can challenge. If you do file a case, a three judge panel in DC will adjudicate.
"No court of the United States, or of any State, shall have subject matter jurisdiction to review, whether by mandamus or otherwise, any action by the Secretary under this subsection.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/247d-6d
This was from the PREP Act signed 2005 by "dubya"
Check the definitions of "United States" and "State" in that law. I'll bet you dollars to donuts it only applies to DC and the federal territories. Just like the Internal Revenue Code.
Compare with
26 USC 3121 (employment taxes) (e) State, United States, and citizenFor purposes of this chapter— (1) State
The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa. (2) United States
The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
26 USC 4612 (a)(4)(A) United States In general
The term “United States” means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
If you want to look at this more deeply, I suggest http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/deoxy.org/fz/fedzone.htm which is free and has 14 chapters of analysis.
Under the false "justice" system, they may have liability protection. Under our rightful common law, they have none. That's just ONE reason why we must take back our grand and petit juries and restore our common law.