I think I follow you... but, could you elaborate? Are you saying that if Durham has produced sealed indictments that those have no statute of limitations? Or are you saying any sealed indictment that could tie into Durham 's stuff would keep him active?
Example: Crime is committed Jul. 4, 2016. 5 year Statute of Limitations would mean you have until Jul. 3, 2021 to file charges or it's too bad, so sad.
Federal grand jury is empaneled on Jun. 14, 2018 for the above crime. And same day, files indictment which is sealed.
SoL clock STOPS.
Indictment can be unsealed after original SoL expiration date and prosecuted as if no time had passed since it was sealed.
Also: Durham waiting until last minute to drop this rather small charge in the grand scheme of things is an absolute confirmation that Sussmann has been cooperating and they wanted to keep it under wraps.
Sussmann was effectively charged with jaywalking. Now let's see what those lesser charges has earned him in the form of singing like a canary.
That would be true, if no previous GJ has been empaneled on the matter and voted to indict.
Remember, we were looking at an astronomical number of sealed federal records during the early days of Q. Some mistakenly assumed ALL were indictments, which is highly unlikely. Simplest explanation is that many (speculated as 90%?) of sealed docs could be supporting records that follow specific indictments.
Alternatively, a single sealed indictment could name 50 people.
Sealed indictments stop the clock on statute of limitations.
Any chance this was a sealed indictment that was actually unsealed for optics?
I think I follow you... but, could you elaborate? Are you saying that if Durham has produced sealed indictments that those have no statute of limitations? Or are you saying any sealed indictment that could tie into Durham 's stuff would keep him active?
Example: Crime is committed Jul. 4, 2016. 5 year Statute of Limitations would mean you have until Jul. 3, 2021 to file charges or it's too bad, so sad.
Federal grand jury is empaneled on Jun. 14, 2018 for the above crime. And same day, files indictment which is sealed.
SoL clock STOPS.
Indictment can be unsealed after original SoL expiration date and prosecuted as if no time had passed since it was sealed.
Also: Durham waiting until last minute to drop this rather small charge in the grand scheme of things is an absolute confirmation that Sussmann has been cooperating and they wanted to keep it under wraps.
Sussmann was effectively charged with jaywalking. Now let's see what those lesser charges has earned him in the form of singing like a canary.
Got it. Thanks. So we just have to pray that Durham has a whole bunch of sealed indictments related to all of this.
This
This
I hope so, but listening to several conservative/MAGA radio hosts today, they all pointed at Sunday as the deadline.
That would be true, if no previous GJ has been empaneled on the matter and voted to indict.
Remember, we were looking at an astronomical number of sealed federal records during the early days of Q. Some mistakenly assumed ALL were indictments, which is highly unlikely. Simplest explanation is that many (speculated as 90%?) of sealed docs could be supporting records that follow specific indictments.
Alternatively, a single sealed indictment could name 50 people.