You are right and I wasn't trying to misquote Q. What I was alluding to is that this is the sprat to catch the mackerel and bigger names will come out of this that will get people's attention. Once one goes they will all go.
I agree. The dominoes will fall. However, his name means nothing to the rest of the world. In the indictment someone who was involved owns 3 websites and is called Tech1. Zuckerberg is known worldwide.
Milley looks like a guy uncomfortable in his own skin. I saw an interview with him on a totally unrelated thing, and I’ve never seen someone who seems to so badly want to be someone else. Perhaps why he is so down with the woke agenda.
But also, I’m not so inclined to believe the word of some Leftist author who just wants to trash Trump and those in his circle. In fact, I probably lean in the opposite direction. Which, of course, probably makes me easier to manipulate.
There’s no telling whose pulling the strings on all these people.
Arrests will be great. Whenever it happens. However, if the charges are going to stick, the military has to go public about being in control. Any ideas how that plays in?
I've seen multiple people who think Tech Executive-1 is Zuck, and the three companies in the indictment are Facebook, Instagram, and What's App.
The only problem is, the description given in the indictment kind of excludes those three companies. It basically says it's a company that has a lot of DNS based requests and traffic (more like a Google, which is a domain registrar, and owns/runs the 8.8.8.8 DNS service), and companies 2 & 3 which basically do data-mining on various data sources, such as data from Company-1.
Instagram and WhatsApp aren't data analytics companies... Sure - they definitely have data science folks running analytics on their users, but those aren't what I took as the primary focus from the indictment.
Oh for sure - without a doubt. And Zuck was 100% on team Hillary/DNC. BUT, I think the evidence in this particular case points elsewhere... I hope we'll see others linked and indicted soon.
Please remember, it wasn't stated that the 'First arrest will shock the world.'
How many times must this be repeated until fucktards stop spreading the fake Q quote?
The actual quote is:
You are right and I wasn't trying to misquote Q. What I was alluding to is that this is the sprat to catch the mackerel and bigger names will come out of this that will get people's attention. Once one goes they will all go.
Sussmann is the first indictment that will trigger a mass pop awakening.
I agree. The dominoes will fall. However, his name means nothing to the rest of the world. In the indictment someone who was involved owns 3 websites and is called Tech1. Zuckerberg is known worldwide.
Yeah, but it wasn’t ever about “shocking the world“ and who knows whose getting arrested. It’s about verifying the intention.
That said, I have to wonder if it’s still not a bigger fish. Was Prince Andrew supposed to be the one, but he went into hiding in Mommy’s palace?
Prince Andrew was served and the High Court has given him 7 days to respond. In the end, no one should be above the law.
Well thanks a lot, now I have to clean myself up.
Anybody got a cigarette?
Yep, see: https://qalerts.app/?n=4566
The first time someone correctly quotes this will shock the world.
Zuxkabuck, Dorsey, Hiildabeast, Obama, Comey, Wray, Milley and the others would actually shock no one.... It's so long over to no one cares.
Milley signifies the end
Milley looks like a guy uncomfortable in his own skin. I saw an interview with him on a totally unrelated thing, and I’ve never seen someone who seems to so badly want to be someone else. Perhaps why he is so down with the woke agenda.
But also, I’m not so inclined to believe the word of some Leftist author who just wants to trash Trump and those in his circle. In fact, I probably lean in the opposite direction. Which, of course, probably makes me easier to manipulate.
There’s no telling whose pulling the strings on all these people.
I would’ve like to see Bill and Melinda Gates, but I’ll take Suckerberg.
There's talk in the indictment about DNS servers, which (to my knowledge), FB has never operated.
Google, on the other hand...
It's either Google or an ISP (ie, AT&T).
Gislaine prince Andrew bill Clinton Huma and Imran Awan.
why did that guy and his crimes fall off the radar after he was given a deal and gave testimony.
Switching out 36 Congressional routors to spy and control 36 of them getting caught trying to flee the country.?
Swallwell? fucking Fang Fang? DiFi with a Chinese spy in her office for 20 years? They both still sit on the intelligence committee? Really?
HUNTER AND JOE? BURISMA? CHINESE DEALS? AWOL BE UNDER Nato for pullout of Afghanistan. One arrest would just be a pissoff tease!
Wait..........are you saying Zuckerberg isn't a friendly Reptilian??????
oh dear.........
Arrests will be great. Whenever it happens. However, if the charges are going to stick, the military has to go public about being in control. Any ideas how that plays in?
I've seen multiple people who think Tech Executive-1 is Zuck, and the three companies in the indictment are Facebook, Instagram, and What's App.
The only problem is, the description given in the indictment kind of excludes those three companies. It basically says it's a company that has a lot of DNS based requests and traffic (more like a Google, which is a domain registrar, and owns/runs the 8.8.8.8 DNS service), and companies 2 & 3 which basically do data-mining on various data sources, such as data from Company-1.
Instagram and WhatsApp aren't data analytics companies... Sure - they definitely have data science folks running analytics on their users, but those aren't what I took as the primary focus from the indictment.
Just some of my thoughts...
Possibly, but FB has a wealth of info on all of us.
Oh for sure - without a doubt. And Zuck was 100% on team Hillary/DNC. BUT, I think the evidence in this particular case points elsewhere... I hope we'll see others linked and indicted soon.
This is probably only the tip of the iceberg.
Oh, no doubt. Interesting times!
So will/when he be arrested? Not a lawyer but does indictment confirm he will be arrested?
Sorry if a dumb question lol