We got ourselves into this as a country by denying God. We have to stop feeling ashamed or that it's less effective to not include Gods name into this. We shouldn't feel the need to tip toe around it anymore, that only benefits our enemy. That's what the devil WANTS us to do, that's what the satanists want us to do. They WANT us to forego saying the lords name at all costs.
I agree with you; how things are communicate does matter. There's only one thing worthy of communicating. We certainly shouldn't deny ANYONE who invokes the name of the lord to do good. We ourselves should be very careful of ever doing that in any scenario. God sees all, even now, even you, even me.
I think your point is valid bc many libtards are allergic to God and any mention of his name invalidates any information that may have been received if God was left out. On the other hand we believe Q is true then everything is biblical and therefore the Truth needs come out
So this brave woman who is a whistleblower, who is thinking and knowing that her speaking out is due to God, shouldn't say that? I get what you're trying to say, but understand the full context of what you're asking. You're asking someone to not tell the truth, to tell what they feel.
Part of the reason we got ourselves into this mess as a country, is our willingness to be quiet and to not bring God into things mostly because we know how people perceive it.
The Bible at no point talks about being discerning when mentioning Gods name in terms of giving him glory, to convince someone of something. We have to stop with this self fulfilled prophecy that when we mention Gods name to give him glory, that it's the "wrong time" to do so. That's essentially what you're saying. That framework builds a notion to be quiet about God, until X time. And that time gets pushed further and further, until we get here. The time for that is long over sir.
We tip toe where our opposition does not. We're silent when our opposition is not. You're asking people to hold their tongue until the right time. It's well intentioned but that's exactly how we got here. Many people in history categorized God believers who espoused his name as lunatics. The Saints never "picked the right time".
When looking at the clip. I think she used God at a very good time.
James could have kept that part out from a marketing standpoint.
Look... In order to reach the "Lost Souls".
We have to communicate with them in a way they are first comfortable with.
I think a lot of young folks are turned away from the church.
Because a lot of folks "preach" the word of God when they aren't ready to hear the message.
If someone feels that someone is preaching to them.
They might close off and not even give it a chance.
We got ourselves into this as a country by denying God. We have to stop feeling ashamed or that it's less effective to not include Gods name into this. We shouldn't feel the need to tip toe around it anymore, that only benefits our enemy. That's what the devil WANTS us to do, that's what the satanists want us to do. They WANT us to forego saying the lords name at all costs.
I agree with you; how things are communicate does matter. There's only one thing worthy of communicating. We certainly shouldn't deny ANYONE who invokes the name of the lord to do good. We ourselves should be very careful of ever doing that in any scenario. God sees all, even now, even you, even me.
I agree.. I just usually mention God. After I got them listening and engage for awhile.
I usually wait..
Where do you get your positive point of view from? At that point.., It makes sense to throw in God.
I believe that mentioning God is very important. But it should be mentioned at the correct time.
I know you mean well, but thinking like this is how God got removed from dang near everything. People waiting for the “right time”.
It’s just about listening and knowing when to mention God.
Just saying it randomly without the proper context. Is what happens s lot in my view.
But I get your point.
I think your point is valid bc many libtards are allergic to God and any mention of his name invalidates any information that may have been received if God was left out. On the other hand we believe Q is true then everything is biblical and therefore the Truth needs come out
So this brave woman who is a whistleblower, who is thinking and knowing that her speaking out is due to God, shouldn't say that? I get what you're trying to say, but understand the full context of what you're asking. You're asking someone to not tell the truth, to tell what they feel.
Part of the reason we got ourselves into this mess as a country, is our willingness to be quiet and to not bring God into things mostly because we know how people perceive it.
The Bible at no point talks about being discerning when mentioning Gods name in terms of giving him glory, to convince someone of something. We have to stop with this self fulfilled prophecy that when we mention Gods name to give him glory, that it's the "wrong time" to do so. That's essentially what you're saying. That framework builds a notion to be quiet about God, until X time. And that time gets pushed further and further, until we get here. The time for that is long over sir.
We tip toe where our opposition does not. We're silent when our opposition is not. You're asking people to hold their tongue until the right time. It's well intentioned but that's exactly how we got here. Many people in history categorized God believers who espoused his name as lunatics. The Saints never "picked the right time".
When looking at the clip. I think she used God at a very good time.
James could have kept that part out from a marketing standpoint.
Look... In order to reach the "Lost Souls". We have to communicate with them in a way they are first comfortable with.
I think a lot of young folks are turned away from the church. Because a lot of folks "preach" the word of God when they aren't ready to hear the message.
If someone feels that someone is preaching to them. They might close off and not even give it a chance.