2
lucidthoughts 2 points ago +2 / -0

epik.com. I'd like to learn if there are others, but definitely epik gets my business by default at this point.

1
lucidthoughts 1 point ago +1 / -0

So this brave woman who is a whistleblower, who is thinking and knowing that her speaking out is due to God, shouldn't say that? I get what you're trying to say, but understand the full context of what you're asking. You're asking someone to not tell the truth, to tell what they feel.

Part of the reason we got ourselves into this mess as a country, is our willingness to be quiet and to not bring God into things mostly because we know how people perceive it.

The Bible at no point talks about being discerning when mentioning Gods name in terms of giving him glory, to convince someone of something. We have to stop with this self fulfilled prophecy that when we mention Gods name to give him glory, that it's the "wrong time" to do so. That's essentially what you're saying. That framework builds a notion to be quiet about God, until X time. And that time gets pushed further and further, until we get here. The time for that is long over sir.

We tip toe where our opposition does not. We're silent when our opposition is not. You're asking people to hold their tongue until the right time. It's well intentioned but that's exactly how we got here. Many people in history categorized God believers who espoused his name as lunatics. The Saints never "picked the right time".

10
lucidthoughts 10 points ago +10 / -0

A follower is generally someone that goes with whatever they're told. He was basically saying that they have have a million people following them, but that the word "follower" isn't an accurate description to depict these people who are anything but "followers".

17
lucidthoughts 17 points ago +17 / -0

We got ourselves into this as a country by denying God. We have to stop feeling ashamed or that it's less effective to not include Gods name into this. We shouldn't feel the need to tip toe around it anymore, that only benefits our enemy. That's what the devil WANTS us to do, that's what the satanists want us to do. They WANT us to forego saying the lords name at all costs.

I agree with you; how things are communicate does matter. There's only one thing worthy of communicating. We certainly shouldn't deny ANYONE who invokes the name of the lord to do good. We ourselves should be very careful of ever doing that in any scenario. God sees all, even now, even you, even me.

1
lucidthoughts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't matter. We fight for the truth even when it's uncomfortable.

6
lucidthoughts 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can tell you that, for horses, I bought 2 bottles of Ivermectin paste and a bottle of injectable Ivermectin fairly easy here in Missouri, and could probably buy more.

9
lucidthoughts 9 points ago +9 / -0

I found a home in Orthodox Christianity (the 2nd biggest denomination in the world behind Catholicism) this year. Most of the people I've met in the church are anti-vaxxers.

3
lucidthoughts 3 points ago +3 / -0

the only part that was added is the orange text. Everything else is real.

4
lucidthoughts 4 points ago +4 / -0

The "My Body My Choice" one is hilarious.

1
lucidthoughts 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's just using their narrative that they prop up. Devils advocate.

2
lucidthoughts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't poison yourself and get drunk over someone you disagree with. the Bible talks about not getting drunk many, many times.

3
lucidthoughts 3 points ago +3 / -0

I get your point but arsenic in a lower dosage is still poison. You have to make the argument of how vitamin d Is good at all.

Vitamin D is a scam that came out of nowhere. Cholecalciferol, rat poison. Vitamin D isn't even really a vitamin, it's a hormone. It's an extremely poor substitute for all of the things we get from natural foods (fish), and from sun.

https://discover.grasslandbeef.com/blog/the-vitamin-d-scam/

by gamepwn
22
lucidthoughts 22 points ago +22 / -0

What a WOMAN. It's such a breathe of fresh air to see a woman who is "actually" strong, not just passing off weak mindedness, men envy, and being argumentative as being strong.

1
lucidthoughts 1 point ago +1 / -0

We were born naked. Yeah tell your daughter or your nieces or the women in your family that they should walk around naked and see how that works out for you.

We have to have sex to procreate. What part of porn is necessary to procreate?

Sex is a wonderful, natural and beautiful thing between two people, and if they want to let the world see them doing it, so let them.

It is a wonderful, natural, and beautiful thing between 2 married people. It becomes not beautiful when we have casual sex, leaning on birth control, abortion, and single motherhood to support our modern view of sex which was not the norm even 50 years ago.

2
lucidthoughts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope it does, but what will you do if nothing does happen?

3
lucidthoughts 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here’s a honest question for you: at what point in the future would you retire this line of reasoning? 1 month? 6 months? 2 years? 10 years? 50 years?

2
lucidthoughts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hadn’t read the Bible or visited a church for around 25 years, since I was a kid. With all this stuff going on, it seemed like EVERYONE who wasn’t bought into lies, who thought critically, non emotionally, who fought back against this injustice, were ALL Christian. Finally talked with an online friend, he pushed me over the top. I’m now a Christian and fully on the path. I could give more very very crazy details about the circumstances that lead up to all of this, but suffice to say I believe now.

1
lucidthoughts 1 point ago +2 / -1

So mocking pedophilia over and over, mocking rituals over and over, throwing up signs multiple times, in addition to him being at the mock feast and showing up on the logs... this is all weak sauce.

7
lucidthoughts 7 points ago +8 / -1

I watched the entire thing. Not sure if all the commenters here will commit to watching a 20 minute video. I started the video skeptical but I mean after watching the full video it's pretty blatant.

2
lucidthoughts 2 points ago +2 / -0

"No see the plan is for Biden to serve a full term, and that's when the military will strike!"

(after Biden wins the presidency the second time)

"No see Biden HAD to serve 2 full terms, that was the plan all along! Don't lose faith in your military!"

Listen at some point we have to recognize that this all does have some level of time limit. If we're trusting the military and the idea is to have Biden be the president for 3 or 4 months, then that defeats the point of everything. It defeats the point of us NOT uprising, it defeats the point of all the EO's Trump has signed, etc.

I still trust the plan but May 1st ain't it bud. At that point I would trust that God has different plans in store for us.

1
lucidthoughts 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's a citizen tomorrow. He has no control over the military as a citizen, obviously. Whatever the military do is of their OWN volition, even IF Trump was involved and help the military. Make sense?

Let me give a explain it like I'm five.

Let's say you're a kid, and your sister goes "oooo Dad is taking your video games because you hit me". Your sister goes to school, and then you ask your parents and they say "yeah we took your video games because you hit your sister", that was THEIR choice. Your little sister has no absolute influence over your parents to force them to do that.

You can claim that your sister told on you and had a hand in the actions, but end of the day that's your PARENTS who have both of your interests at heart.

I'm sure there are holes in the analogy but you get the point right. The military is not aligned with Donald Trump, Donald Trump is aligned with the military. The military is calling the shots, not Donald Trump. Donald Trump doesn't have the power to coerce the military to do anything it didn't want to do already. It's 100% impartial.

view more: Next ›