Imagine you deposit 1 million dollars into the bank, but 100k worth of it was fake money...
The bank will count the deposit and confirm you gave them 1 million dollars...
Finally, the bank will check each bill and discover that 100,000 dollars of the money deposited were counterfeit...
You do not get to keep 1 million dollars...
You get to keep 900 thousand dollars...
Guess what?...
You also get a quick trip to jail...
--
The audit report draft says the ballots they counted essentially matched the original count as reported by the county...
The MSM has been shouting this from the rooftops...
What the MSM didn't tell you is that there are MORE FRAUDULENT BALLOTS THAN BIDEN "WON" BY!...
This theory suggests that the portion of the report that has allegedly been leaked is not talking about the Important Part whatsoever.
The votes that were counted accurately show they were cast for Joe Biden. The theory above states that a significant portion of those counted votes were counterfeit or fraudulent.
This part was apparently absent from the leaked report, so people are hoping that in less than an hour, we'll get the part of the report that suggests that despite the votes being counted for Biden, there were so many fraudulent ones that we can still say Biden probably lost.
I have not seen that sort of proof in the leaked portion of the report, so if it's there, we will have to see it by the report presentation and assume the leak was incomplete. If they haven't proven that there were a significant number of fraudulent votes cast for Biden, then conclusion of the report would be that the votes counted for Biden were legitimate, and they can only suspect the possibility that there may have been problems, but can't prove that any actually occurred. Which is what the leaked portion of the report seems to suggest so far.
We will see very shortly.
You can bet your ass trump has seen it though and he's already talking about it. GEOTUS wouldn't say shit if it wasn't there
Has Trump said he's seen it? The quote from today:
Saying "he's heard" isn't quite the same thing as lending his own credibility to the notion that the report says what he hopes it does.
Okay but take that statement, thenpair it with a few facts, such as who he is, what he's done, and all the help he has. This man is a gateway of information. You can bet he gets it first. Especially this information, that is about him first and foremost
We're about to see whether that's true or not.
I think this is exactly right. The leaked report says there is cause for concern about roughly 50,000 votes. But it also hedges in basically every section, saying the votes might not be illegal. (And if you read the explanations in the draft report, it's easy to imagine circumstances where some of these 50,000 votes were in fact legitimate. There are obviously some people, for example, who were given the same name and born in the same year.) What we need is proof of how many of these votes were in fact fraudulent, and who those fraudulent votes were for. Until we see that, it's all conjecture.
My hope is to hear something like
"...37‰ of the ballots were produced by an unauthorized printer with ties to the triads and organized crime, the ballots were pre-completed at the time of printing with 'yes' votes for Biden, and are all duplicates of voters who had their vote for Biden counted multiple times..."
I mean, I don't think it will be that obvious, but a guy can dream.
Triads what? Triads of Arizona
They say 'might' to be polite...because Maricopa refused to cooperate with data and explanations for anomalies. By behaving totally independent and focusing within their parameters the ninjas have essentially forced Maricopa to answer those questions. What will they say to explain their acceptance of clearly unacceptable ballots? The truth will get them jailed. But to continue stonewalling simple answers is a very, very bad look.