Your point on zesty is what I agree with and what keeps me reading zh. Like with the daily mail, the actions in the comments. However, the daily mail's articles can be absolute drivel, machine-generated, while zh has good journalism. This article however smacked of deep state insertion.
'Betrayed' is way too loaded a term for a website.
ZeroHedge, over the years, has gradually veered towards posting everything, regardless of how good it is, without any editorial offset.
If you read some of the comments of the owners, I think they want to train their readership to have their brains actively engaged at all times and to use the site as a means to practice discernment. This mindset of always being in a state of combat also extends to their comments section, where they encouraged readers to make liberal use of the "ignore" feature, rather than to ban users outright. Of course de-monetiziation altered that plan to some degree.
Obviously, all that also works as a clever argument to cover for editorial laziness and lighter stewardship of the site. I still find it to be a good resource worth supporting.
This article was written shortly before the audit was presented to the senate. The article is based on the draft report, not the audit.
...The draft report was issued in three parts adding up to approximately 110 pages, and recommends several areas of concern to be investigated by the Arizona attorney general.
We're sure we haven't heard the last of the AZ audit saga.
Stupid cunts couldn't wait a few hours and it has cost them their entire reputation. Trump's leak drew out the last of the swamp creatures.
Technically, at this point, AZ is still in the B column. Will take the AZ senate to chance that.
You can’t eat cats, Kevin
I mean. ....Tyler Durden is writing a majority of the articles.
Tyler ain't gay. he was smashing Marla with kitchen gloves on.
I agree but accepting the leak as true so fast is fairly evil, not just opportunistic schizophrenia.
Your point on zesty is what I agree with and what keeps me reading zh. Like with the daily mail, the actions in the comments. However, the daily mail's articles can be absolute drivel, machine-generated, while zh has good journalism. This article however smacked of deep state insertion.
'Betrayed' is way too loaded a term for a website.
Like fish chum 😅
ZeroHedge, over the years, has gradually veered towards posting everything, regardless of how good it is, without any editorial offset.
If you read some of the comments of the owners, I think they want to train their readership to have their brains actively engaged at all times and to use the site as a means to practice discernment. This mindset of always being in a state of combat also extends to their comments section, where they encouraged readers to make liberal use of the "ignore" feature, rather than to ban users outright. Of course de-monetiziation altered that plan to some degree.
Obviously, all that also works as a clever argument to cover for editorial laziness and lighter stewardship of the site. I still find it to be a good resource worth supporting.
This article was written shortly before the audit was presented to the senate. The article is based on the draft report, not the audit.
Headline was gabage, article content informative.
Lol the handshakes gettin' shut down, and yes I trust no one specific on everything anymore.
Ah they even made sure to specify "the GOP controlled senate". The way propagandists ensure to speak.
It belongs to Disney so take it with a mine of salt.
They have good chart porn and comment section used to be spicy.
They are cunts but they did call out wuflu as engineered.