Jovan said to look for whats NOT in the audit a few days ago...now I know!
ℹ️ ⚔️ Info Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
They didnt provide any evidence for the forensic paper! They were using UV light and a powerful digital camera to forenscially examine the paper and ballot ink and all of that and i didnt hear about that today. And if i missed it then it must have been skinned over for a reason. Wonder why that was held back?
Sorry, no sauce on anything. All i recall is i heard Jovan speak about this within the past few days on a Rumble interview and Seth Keshel was on it too i think. I let his comment whiz past me until i noticed today that the forensics on the paper itself was missing.
Yea they said that had over 1000 terebites of data with imaging quality high enough to detect the types of ink used to fill out ballots and such. But then never mentioned any results related to this capability.
I remember him saying the two things that are not complete are:
1.) Splunk logs analysis as only recently received from county 2.) Paper ballots still checking due to size of task
VP of Tech here. Everyone talks about getting "the routers" from the county, but the logs (as aggregated and analyzed by a SIEM tool like Splunk) are what that really means.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_information_and_event_management
We stood up Elastic in my company for this same purpose and it has been a Godsend.
You are 100% correct and I understand this. I have corrected my comment to reflect this.
I prefer terror-bites.😉
True that if you're a Maricopa County election supervisor, kek!
Shit... that's almost as big as a PETERBYTE!!!
He said they have over a petabyte of data.
Yes he did. Two PB iirc.
Ahhh... sorry... I meant PETER BITE!!!