TRUST THE PLAN. IT IS UNFOLDING. But, OK, bois and xirls, what's next in that plan? Indictments? Prosecutions in AZ? The audit still has things to drop that weren't presented, Friday. Do those come out, and then something else happens? What would that be? And Durham is rolling, does that accelerate?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You may want to read that manual again. A combatant is the equivalent of a soldier. China would be an enemy not an enemy combatant. We are not at War with China and this is important legally for a charge of treason. We didn't have any charges of treason during the cold war. The Rosenbergs were not tried for treason, but espionage in a Federal Court, not a military tribunal.
Biden or any member of Congress or any civilian not found on a battlefield would not be designated an enemy combatant because they were not subject to military jurisprudence before their arrest. The Universal Code of Military Justice is quite clear on this. See Article 2 of the UCMJ. They would face trial in a regular civilian court. The ISIS TRUCK ATTACK on NYC in 2017 is going through federal, not military courts.
The military is currently running the country?
Who? What's the name of the officer in charge of the country. Is it more than one? What branch?
The Rosenbergs were not acting on behalf of an enemy that used a biological weapon on the US, which is an act of war according to chapter 6.9.
I didn't say the military is currently running the country.
You pointed out that I conflated the term belligerent with enemy combatant. There goes my whole theory!
You seem more interested in pulling things into the weeds instead of a good faith debate about a theory. Are you aware this is a Q forum?
The Rosenbergs were dealing in nuclear weapons. ...so much, much bigger threats than nuclear weapons.
You said this
I see now you were discussing the pretext for the military to run the country in your theory.
The conflation I was pointing out was the conflation between an individual and a country.
I'm pulling things to the weeds ???....in bad faith!?!.
I thought I was discussing the central point of your theory and why I think it's hopium