At this point I do not see the DOL (OSHA) proceeding forward with a vaccination rule. There are way to many potential scenarios to cover with a rule or rules. Furthermore, the government does not have the infrastructure to support the inspection of employers, nor the time to fleece through all the data that would be submitted by employers to validate the information. As an employer I believe it was a scare tactic only.
Section 655 would allow for a temporary emergency rule, but part of that is that they'd need to demonstrate the stab provides significant protection from the hazard.
The fact that those of us in the control group are still alive would most likely stand as definitive evidence warranting a permanent injunction.
Agreed. To your first point, they can not provide any evidence that the shot provides any significant protection. It is not by definition a vaccine, and can only (by "their" own data) lessen symptons.
The intent and scope of OSHA's powers do not allow them to determine the rights of the employee's personal health/medical decisions. This is an extremely overreaching effort by the Feds.
Any day now Q
The word "vaccine" or "vaccination" does not occur on that link.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/09/28/bidens-vax-mandate-to-be-enforced-by-fining-companies-70000-to-700000/?sh=7c8794c41c0d
Sorry, assumed most would have seen the other threads on this and the legislation Dems are trying to ram though.
The # of the Code jumped out at me.
It's apparently section 17 of the OSHA act of 1970, 29 USC 666.
What exactly are you trying to make up? Lol I see nothing about the Vaxx in your link.
At this point I do not see the DOL (OSHA) proceeding forward with a vaccination rule. There are way to many potential scenarios to cover with a rule or rules. Furthermore, the government does not have the infrastructure to support the inspection of employers, nor the time to fleece through all the data that would be submitted by employers to validate the information. As an employer I believe it was a scare tactic only.
Section 655 would allow for a temporary emergency rule, but part of that is that they'd need to demonstrate the stab provides significant protection from the hazard.
The fact that those of us in the control group are still alive would most likely stand as definitive evidence warranting a permanent injunction.
Agreed. To your first point, they can not provide any evidence that the shot provides any significant protection. It is not by definition a vaccine, and can only (by "their" own data) lessen symptons.
The intent and scope of OSHA's powers do not allow them to determine the rights of the employee's personal health/medical decisions. This is an extremely overreaching effort by the Feds.