Very important article, and can see why it’s stickied 👍🏽😎. A lot of good data esp for those being redpilled currently. “Experts say” is more than a catchphrase, it’s mind control phraseology as explained in article. Also...Dazcak had better HANG. Right next to Fauxi. He did more than the article mentions too...a real psycho.
This is a basic persuasion principle. Appeal to authority. However, it is more subtle than just trotting out an "expert" to say whatever. The "expert" has to somehow touch the respondent and make him feel that this expert is his expert. Experts are our mental anchors in the world, most people have experts they trust.
Instead of a label, expert, substitute the idea and emotional pull of "person I relate to and admire." People are persuaded by this illusion of relationship.
Anons such as yourself, who read this board, or otherwise follow Q posts, research etc.
The swamp is looking for any excuse to discredit Q and Q anons, and painting them as violent is an easy way to do that. For example Jan 6.
Its well understood that one of the easiest ways to discredit any movement, and turn public opinion against any movement, is by making them look violent.
But something tells me you already know all this, and are simply ‘playing stupid’ as a way to COINTELPRO this board.
We knew what you meant, fren.❤️
I think we all want to see justice happen so badly b/c there has been a complete lack of accountability and consequences to date for people in positions with power. Western civilization can no longer claim that “no one is above the law” and it’s beyond frustrating for the average citizen.
Very important article, and can see why it’s stickied 👍🏽😎. A lot of good data esp for those being redpilled currently. “Experts say” is more than a catchphrase, it’s mind control phraseology as explained in article. Also...Dazcak had better HANG. Right next to Fauxi. He did more than the article mentions too...a real psycho.
Experts equal the guys that made up the lie.
This is a basic persuasion principle. Appeal to authority. However, it is more subtle than just trotting out an "expert" to say whatever. The "expert" has to somehow touch the respondent and make him feel that this expert is his expert. Experts are our mental anchors in the world, most people have experts they trust.
Instead of a label, expert, substitute the idea and emotional pull of "person I relate to and admire." People are persuaded by this illusion of relationship.
They are two hands on the same sick body.
Please don’t make inflammatory comments that can be used to make Q anons look violent.
Instead, simply demand that these people get arrested, convicted, sentenced, and incarcerated, in accordance with the law.
“Rule of Law” instead of “Rule of Mob”
If you want to make it any more inflammatory than that, just pretend to be advocating for the defendants “right to a speedy trial”.
Justice delayed, is justice denied, and every day, Dr Fauci is being deprived of his right to a speedy trial!
What is a Qanon?
Anons such as yourself, who read this board, or otherwise follow Q posts, research etc.
The swamp is looking for any excuse to discredit Q and Q anons, and painting them as violent is an easy way to do that. For example Jan 6.
Its well understood that one of the easiest ways to discredit any movement, and turn public opinion against any movement, is by making them look violent.
But something tells me you already know all this, and are simply ‘playing stupid’ as a way to COINTELPRO this board.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YJSehRlU34w
Because this has worked so well so far - right?!?!?!?
Jan 6
Noted Fren. I usually tone-back my feelings (regarding violence), and fully grok what you’re saying. I briefly got fired-up.
We knew what you meant, fren.❤️ I think we all want to see justice happen so badly b/c there has been a complete lack of accountability and consequences to date for people in positions with power. Western civilization can no longer claim that “no one is above the law” and it’s beyond frustrating for the average citizen.
TY 👍🏽💕