They say that the vaccine mandate is based on science. Therefore, this argument proves, with science, that the mandate is not grounded in science.
If this argument is won, then the mandate ends and freedom of choice is maintained.
You are correct that the ultimate argument is the right to choose without being coerced, but no need to fall back to that argument yet when they are falsely claiming to be backed by science.
They will say, “Maybe you’re right, Rand. Now prove it.” Then we’ll have a testing scheme and if you don’t have the right antibody levels, you’ll have to take the vaccine. These people promoting vaccine mandates all need to be fired.
Almost...I hear a lot of natural immunity talk. What about pure freedom to choose what you accept and what you don't?
They say that the vaccine mandate is based on science. Therefore, this argument proves, with science, that the mandate is not grounded in science.
If this argument is won, then the mandate ends and freedom of choice is maintained.
You are correct that the ultimate argument is the right to choose without being coerced, but no need to fall back to that argument yet when they are falsely claiming to be backed by science.
They will say, “Maybe you’re right, Rand. Now prove it.” Then we’ll have a testing scheme and if you don’t have the right antibody levels, you’ll have to take the vaccine. These people promoting vaccine mandates all need to be fired.