Same reason we've been joking about Pfizer making Pfizermectin. Same as Ivermectin, but brand name so they can charge $500 a bottle instead of $5 a bottle.
So if Merck makes a patentable drug that is Ivermectin Version 2.0. [Just like Ivermectin but we switched a couple atoms around) and charges higher prices, then they can get some ol'mighty dollar for themselves.
At this point, I might not even be as angry with them as I should be if it stops the vaccines.
Idgas if they make money off of it. If it does the same job of their ivermectin pill it will cure people and put the deadly mRna vaxx out of business and thats what i care about atm because the kid jab mandates are murder.
Merck are the owners and producers of Ivermectin..................................
So why invent a new drug that does the same....
There is something that doesn't add up and I can't help but suspect that whitehats are doing the math on this one...
Same reason we've been joking about Pfizer making Pfizermectin. Same as Ivermectin, but brand name so they can charge $500 a bottle instead of $5 a bottle.
So if Merck makes a patentable drug that is Ivermectin Version 2.0. [Just like Ivermectin but we switched a couple atoms around) and charges higher prices, then they can get some ol'mighty dollar for themselves.
At this point, I might not even be as angry with them as I should be if it stops the vaccines.
Idgas if they make money off of it. If it does the same job of their ivermectin pill it will cure people and put the deadly mRna vaxx out of business and thats what i care about atm because the kid jab mandates are murder.
Why?
To get around the media generated stigma of Ivermectin.
To build their single pill as a complete regimen the "independent" testers can't fuck with.