That much was obvious when the Event 201 exercise came out a month before the virus. Organized by none other than the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Unfortunately I have seen insufficient evidence to prove this in a succinct way. For example, it is easy to show that Fauci knew about funding for SARS gain of function research. There is a clear .gov paper trail. It is impossible to deny (even though he did). But there is no way to show intent of release in such a clear way. Showing event 201 could be coincidence from the point of view of a normie skeptic. It's still a great redpill, but its not conclusive.
There must be evidence somewhere that shows intent conclusively. I have looked a fair bit, I just can't find it.
If you're presenting this case in a court... sure. In a "layman on a discussion forum looking at all available details and arriving at the only conclusion that seems to make sense" ... sure as heck seems intentional.
I still haven't even decided yet if I believe anything at all was even "leaked", or if this just happens to be a normal yearly strain of cold/flu that's been pumped up to the high heavens with fear and paranoia.
Whatever "this" happens to be.. at least the tyrannical, authoritarian response to it was obviously intentional in my eyes.
I am writing a report that will be presented in the court of public opinion. In order to have a chance at redpilling the sleepers it must meet that standard of evidence.
So yes, that is necessary, and I dare say, making these types of cases is our job.
I still haven't even decided yet if I believe anything at all was even "leaked", or if this just happens to be a normal yearly strain of cold/flu that's been pumped up to the high heavens with fear and paranoia.
Given the potential for disinformation anything is possible, but there is just too much evidence to support a real novel virus (SARS variant), causing a real disease (Covid-19) with real unique symptoms, for (many) real people that I know, for me to give any credence to any other possibility. Especially since every presentation of evidence that I have seen so far to the contrary doesn't stand up to debate.
Whatever "this" happens to be.. at least the tyrannical, authoritarian response to it was obviously intentional in my eyes.
I think that is almost certainly true, but me thinking it is true, and being able to provide sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt are two different things. I probably could provide that level of evidence, but it would take a great deal of work, including presenting Q, and all that that entails. I need something succinct. A clear path, or even a little more evidence than just event 201, operation lockstep, and GOF research funding.
This is why I hate the "lab leak theory"
Leak = accident
This = intentional
That much was obvious when the Event 201 exercise came out a month before the virus. Organized by none other than the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Unfortunately I have seen insufficient evidence to prove this in a succinct way. For example, it is easy to show that Fauci knew about funding for SARS gain of function research. There is a clear .gov paper trail. It is impossible to deny (even though he did). But there is no way to show intent of release in such a clear way. Showing event 201 could be coincidence from the point of view of a normie skeptic. It's still a great redpill, but its not conclusive.
There must be evidence somewhere that shows intent conclusively. I have looked a fair bit, I just can't find it.
If you're presenting this case in a court... sure. In a "layman on a discussion forum looking at all available details and arriving at the only conclusion that seems to make sense" ... sure as heck seems intentional.
I still haven't even decided yet if I believe anything at all was even "leaked", or if this just happens to be a normal yearly strain of cold/flu that's been pumped up to the high heavens with fear and paranoia.
Whatever "this" happens to be.. at least the tyrannical, authoritarian response to it was obviously intentional in my eyes.
I am writing a report that will be presented in the court of public opinion. In order to have a chance at redpilling the sleepers it must meet that standard of evidence.
So yes, that is necessary, and I dare say, making these types of cases is our job.
Given the potential for disinformation anything is possible, but there is just too much evidence to support a real novel virus (SARS variant), causing a real disease (Covid-19) with real unique symptoms, for (many) real people that I know, for me to give any credence to any other possibility. Especially since every presentation of evidence that I have seen so far to the contrary doesn't stand up to debate.
I think that is almost certainly true, but me thinking it is true, and being able to provide sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt are two different things. I probably could provide that level of evidence, but it would take a great deal of work, including presenting Q, and all that that entails. I need something succinct. A clear path, or even a little more evidence than just event 201, operation lockstep, and GOF research funding.
It started in September of 2019.
Good find