Oh no, Whidbey Island. This was the only thing in the Q drops that made me cringe.
The claim (read the 20 or so drops after this one) was that a cabal sub launched an ICBM from a heavily populated bay near Seattle that was supposed to hit Air Force One while it flew over North Korea.
It was such a screwy thing. AF1 wasn't anywhere near North Korea or Seattle at the time. An ICBM travels at 15,000 mph, AF1 travels around 500 mph - that just doesn't work. There's so many other ways to shoot down an airplane.
But, it can maybe be chalked up to creating awareness around HRC's nuclear sub and the danger it can create?
On the surface your cringe is fairly well justified... an ICBM seems like the wrong weapon.
However, I can think of reasons that this might be exactly as Q implies:
A nuclear detonation somewhere "close" to AF1 would indeed bring it down. This could be spun as an assassination by NK.
ICBMs are MIRV. I suspect that our ICBMs have several possible RVs that they can be armed with, including anti-aircraft capabilities, and, also anti-ship, anti-sub, and even anti-ICBM. However, AF1 would have been well defended from most anti-aircraft type missile attacks, so I think it's possible this is what happened and the defensive capabilities of AF1 worked?
The fact is: the Whidbey Island launch DID happen while AF1 was in the air. It was either intended to do the president harm in some way, or it was fake to give the president cover. It is also possible that the launch that we saw was the RESPONSE to an attack on AF1? We don't REALLY know what it was.
Where did the ICBM go? You don't just launch a missile and it vanishes, it goes somewhere.
Sorry, this irks my background and training in the military to no end since I worked with these subs at one point.
But yeah, where did that missile go? Our Navy is just now doing tests on how to shoot down ICBM's and they have success when the missile is known and being tracked and controlled.
An F-15 crashed near Okinawa on June 10, 2018. (There are no coincidences.)
When I worked at MDC over 40 years ago, they were testing F-15s to go ballistic and to see if they were capable of intercepting missiles with their weapons systems.
One reason Q mentions Red October could be the climax when James Earl Jones, who I believe was NSA, instructs a Navy seaman to self-destruct the torpedo that was about to hit the Red October. Then Jones' character flashes his badge and says something like "You heard the torpedo hit the hull, and I was never here."
All that to say it's possible the white hats self-destructed the ICBM.
This would be interesting to know, but the specs of what AF1 is capable of being protected against are such highly kept secrets we would never know. We could only speculated and even then our best guesses would still be way off.
Got it from a tune by The Orb if you ever heard of them. They were the 90’s version of Pink Floyd, and David Gilmour did guitar work on one of their albums in 2014 which is almost like another PF album in itself.
Read the drops, search for ICBM, there were two QandA sessions with Q where ICBM was mentioned in direct relation to Whidbey Island.
But, let's say it was not an ICBM and a standard surface to air, sub launchable missile, there are a bunch of those, but none have a range to cover from Seattle to Singapore with any hope.
So, since Q confirmed it was a missile that was not supposed to be launched, how is it possible?
As I said, this is the only post where I cringe and it's entirely because I have massive experience with this topic.
Oh no, Whidbey Island. This was the only thing in the Q drops that made me cringe.
The claim (read the 20 or so drops after this one) was that a cabal sub launched an ICBM from a heavily populated bay near Seattle that was supposed to hit Air Force One while it flew over North Korea.
It was such a screwy thing. AF1 wasn't anywhere near North Korea or Seattle at the time. An ICBM travels at 15,000 mph, AF1 travels around 500 mph - that just doesn't work. There's so many other ways to shoot down an airplane.
But, it can maybe be chalked up to creating awareness around HRC's nuclear sub and the danger it can create?
On the surface your cringe is fairly well justified... an ICBM seems like the wrong weapon.
However, I can think of reasons that this might be exactly as Q implies:
A nuclear detonation somewhere "close" to AF1 would indeed bring it down. This could be spun as an assassination by NK.
ICBMs are MIRV. I suspect that our ICBMs have several possible RVs that they can be armed with, including anti-aircraft capabilities, and, also anti-ship, anti-sub, and even anti-ICBM. However, AF1 would have been well defended from most anti-aircraft type missile attacks, so I think it's possible this is what happened and the defensive capabilities of AF1 worked?
The fact is: the Whidbey Island launch DID happen while AF1 was in the air. It was either intended to do the president harm in some way, or it was fake to give the president cover. It is also possible that the launch that we saw was the RESPONSE to an attack on AF1? We don't REALLY know what it was.
edit: typing is hard
Where did the ICBM go? You don't just launch a missile and it vanishes, it goes somewhere.
Sorry, this irks my background and training in the military to no end since I worked with these subs at one point.
But yeah, where did that missile go? Our Navy is just now doing tests on how to shoot down ICBM's and they have success when the missile is known and being tracked and controlled.
https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2020/11/17/us-navy-destroyer-shoots-down-an-icbm-in-milestone-test/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CWe%20have%20demonstrated%20that%20an,layered%20defense%20of%20the%20homeland.%E2%80%9D
An F-15 crashed near Okinawa on June 10, 2018. (There are no coincidences.) When I worked at MDC over 40 years ago, they were testing F-15s to go ballistic and to see if they were capable of intercepting missiles with their weapons systems.
And, I remember how those tests worked out in the end, do you?
One reason Q mentions Red October could be the climax when James Earl Jones, who I believe was NSA, instructs a Navy seaman to self-destruct the torpedo that was about to hit the Red October. Then Jones' character flashes his badge and says something like "You heard the torpedo hit the hull, and I was never here."
All that to say it's possible the white hats self-destructed the ICBM.
So, a scene in a movie dictated what happened?
It would have to be VERY close, as AF1 is hardened against EMP
EMP? What about the air pressure of a nuke blast anywhere near any aircraft? I fully admit I have no clue.
This would be interesting to know, but the specs of what AF1 is capable of being protected against are such highly kept secrets we would never know. We could only speculated and even then our best guesses would still be way off.
AF1 is a flying EMP proof Faraday Cage.... It is set up in a way that when hit with massive EMPs it is impervious....
We are talking about the New Trump one right, the secret one with super extra features, right??
A 747... "nuke proof".
HAHAHAHAHA!
Even our largest Aircraft Carriers aren't "nuke proof".
A nearby detonation of a nuclear warhead would destroy either one.
EMP Proof... I misspoke, Meant EMP Proof....
They say they use tesla tech to protect aircraft carriers so...
They have tech thats centuries ahead of what the public knows about...
Might want to expand your mind before laughing at others, as less than 250 years ago, they laughed at people when they spoke about electricity...
I believe this was an assassination attempt.. well unless one believes in coincidences.
Take note on weather camera image then compare to:
Brennan tweet: https://files.catbox.moe/tdacvg.jpeg
Avenatti tweet: https://files.catbox.moe/bq6vj4.jpeg
Thing is Richard Beebo Russell and the Q400 hijacking had something to do with this.
It supposedly crashed on Ketron island, which allowed WH to get on the island to investigate crash site, and probably a lot more.
Got it from a tune by The Orb if you ever heard of them. They were the 90’s version of Pink Floyd, and David Gilmour did guitar work on one of their albums in 2014 which is almost like another PF album in itself.
We can't be sure AF1 wasn't over Whitby Island at that time...
Yes we can, that evening Trump was leaving the EU and heading to North Korea at exactly that time, it was being tracked and shown live.
Thanks fren! I didn't remember that but I trust what Q posted just not sure the purpose...
When the drive put out this garbage article saying it was just an optical illusion and it was really a hellicopter...i was convinced something was up.
We all know something was up, but it's not an ICBM.
It was a helicopter and that was the “spotlight” was what people saw when they reported on Seattle KING news.
Hahaha!
It's a bit loose, but Intercontinental = range, Ballistic = it leaves the Earth's (ROUND) atmosphere, etc. etc.
Other sorts of missiles can be launched, some ICBM tubes were retrofitted a long time ago.
Yeah, you're right, I had never heard someone refer to an ICBM being launched at AF1 either and was around when that whole thing transpired.
Read the drops, search for ICBM, there were two QandA sessions with Q where ICBM was mentioned in direct relation to Whidbey Island.
But, let's say it was not an ICBM and a standard surface to air, sub launchable missile, there are a bunch of those, but none have a range to cover from Seattle to Singapore with any hope.
So, since Q confirmed it was a missile that was not supposed to be launched, how is it possible?
As I said, this is the only post where I cringe and it's entirely because I have massive experience with this topic.
The problem comes from those who didn't experience it at the time. They come in now and try to dispel what we heard and saw at the time.