It could also mean that the information showing Sussman's guilt would disclose other people who might be indicted, and they want to control the release of that info.
If that was the case, the indictment would be sealed. They definitely have to tell the defendant the real names of the people in the indict like the guy they called Tech Executive 1, because that person Is a witness. This must be revealed.
Then let me rephrase it. Maybe they dont want to reveal identities of other people related to this indictment, people who have not yet been indicted or charged, but who could potentially be charged in future.
It could also mean that the information showing Sussman's guilt would disclose other people who might be indicted, and they want to control the release of that info.
yup, the last part is about designating information as "sensitive" at will.
Bingo. They want to keep a lid on future prosecution targets.
Probably not.
If that was the case, the indictment would be sealed. They definitely have to tell the defendant the real names of the people in the indict like the guy they called Tech Executive 1, because that person Is a witness. This must be revealed.
Exactly, but they dont want to leak the identities of people like Teck Executive 1 just yet, even if they have to share it with the defense
They can't reveal the names. It's against DOJ policy. Only the person being indicted is named.
Tech Executive 1 would know immediately they were talking about him. They aren't hiding anything from him.
Also everyone from that indictment have come forward and indentified themselves
Then let me rephrase it. Maybe they dont want to reveal identities of other people related to this indictment, people who have not yet been indicted or charged, but who could potentially be charged in future.