đ¨NEW California study finds that vaccinated individuals are more susceptible to COVID variant infections than unvaccinated. The increase in the frequency of more antibody-resistant strains in the population correlates with the increase in the frequency of vaccination in the population.
(media.greatawakening.win)
â ď¸ Vax-tarded â ď¸
I haven't read it, but this looks like the source doc.
Seems to be. There's the title right at the bottom.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.19.21262139v1.full
Thank you Slyver. Not peer reviewed yet
Peer review. The ultimate bullshit these days. They are all on the payroll.
Exactly!
Anyone got a link to the study?
Yeah, really, you'd think it would be the most obvious thing to do, but alas....
Everyone likes to believe what suits them.
Or OP could just post the bloody link to the bloody study instead of a single graphic, then we all might be able to form a bloody opinion based on said study. Too difficult? Hmmm, maybe.
Point me to your helpful posts please. Iâd love to learn from you fren.
They're easy enough to find. Been here awhile.
I must not see them because I blocked you a while back. I donât remember why as I donât hold onto those things or pay that much attention to distractions, though I could probably give a general guess.
Go away, sonny boy.
Non-GMO here. Grade A Organic!!!
A study? You still got it wrong. The delta variant comes from the Vax idiots
Countdown before itâs retracted...5...4...3...2...
The study suggests that boosters will be needed. My sides!
Yeah, but there are still more cases, both resistant and nonresistant, reported with the unvaccinated. https://files.catbox.moe/gfitac.png
Unvaxxed tested at 40 cycles, usually 4x the frequency in jobs requiring testing. Vaxxed tested at 28 cycles, 1/4 as much - designed to create a result showing far more positives in unvaxxed. Also, for most data 1 jab or 2 jabs with less that 2 weeks after are logged under unvaxxed. Numbers game.
True, but that's a separate argument. It also invalidates OP's conclusion. Whether or not you trust the data, I don't think this paper is good for persuading people to be more skeptical. Just lead with the unreliability of the PCR tests.
This just shows that if people with antibodies get infected, they are more likely to be infected with antibody resistant strains. Which is what youâd expect. It doesnât mean theyâre more succeptible to those strains, it means theyâre less succeptible to the strain that isnât resistant.
Explain why the vaxxed are more susceptible than the unvaxxed please.
Thatâs not what this shows.
Never mind. I see your post history and itâs clear who you are.
It doesnât show more antibody resistant strains with the unvaxxed than the vaxxed? You must be too busy to properly explain.