Who and why on the Graphene?? Isn't that what is claimed to NOT be affiliated with these vaccines and also isn't graphene one of the major suspects in why these vaccines are turning out to be so deadly? And somebody somewhere got a freaking Nobel prize for the use of that stuff??
Gasoline is extremely useful but not as a replacement for water. Graphene is an extremely useful material. But you can’t blame the material if someone uses it with malicious intent.
Egg Zachary, well I was looking into it, and it seems a novel prize for physics was awarded to a dude for graphene back in 2010, and 2020 was the 10th year anniversary, but I could not find any others for graphene that have been passed out.
The article seemed to imply that graphene is not even real? Just a hypothetical material?
Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov won a physics Nobel Prize for their construction of Graphene, described as carbon arranged in a hexagonal lattice and only one atom thick. They produced something that existed only in theory. Graphene was to find applications in materials technology and electronics.
I didn’t know you could win Nobel prize for just making stuff up. 🤡. Is this for real? Where are the physicfags
I noticed they say it's only a 2 dimensional material. And I'm over here, as an engineer aka (physicfag) wondering how in the hell 2 dimensional objects can exist in a 3 dimensional world... I guess because it's only 1 atom thick?? But then what about the subatomic particles? Seems like a matter of perspective... get it...? Matter of Perspective...
It’s “2D” in the same sense that a drawing on a piece of paper is “2D”. Of course if you look close enough you’ll find some thickness, but for most practical purposes the object stretches out in only two dimensions.
Understandable. So in this instance they must not be counting the thickness of 1 atom as a dimension since it doesn't reach out any further on that plane than a thickness of 1. But on the X and Y it must go beyond the base unit of 1. Well.... that may be the case, but for the sake of arguing, I will still say the thickness of 1 atom counts. Because that 1 atom is supposedly made up of numerous subatomic particles, the number of protons, neutrons, and electrons depending on the atomic structure. Not to mention the fact that we don't even really know what an actual atom really even looks like when not in motion though, so it could literally all be bologna for all us peasants know. Which makes me wonder how they are even looking at this 1 atom thick atomic structure of graphene. Because thanks to experiments like the double slit, and theories such as Max Planck's particle-wavelength duality... Apparently an atom is both a wave and a particle. And they will act as waves until observed in one moment of spacetime. And going further, we humans distort the structure and behavior of the atom as soon as we shine photons of light on them to observe them in the first place. Because the photons bombard the atom and ruin the originality of what whas there before we decided to look. This is why Einstein and Bohr were always arguing. Einstein was quoted in saying, as he defended classical physics against niels bohr's quantum mechanics by saying, "I will choose to believe the moon is there, even when I am not looking at it."
It's real, the Nobel prize was much afterthey were already observing it. It's just expensive and hard to make do you won't see graphene tires or shoes.
"They produced something that existed only in theory."
If they had added [up until that point] it would perhaps be clearer, but it is quite implied. Ie, it was theorized up until it was then proven to exist.
Edit: Air, and it's various elements, was also at one time theoretical.
Because the management of the Nobel price has been stolen by the very same people who kicked Nobel out. It was when he got rich for inventing the dynamite they suddenly got interested, in his money.
Quote from the article: "The PCR method of Kary Mullis (chemistry prize) was for the purpose of laboratory production by making a lot of something from a little. The method does not accurately diagnose illness." If you look at Dr. Mullis' video interviews from a few years ago, he says this, himself, and states his mistrust of Dr. Fauci (he knew him from the HIV work). Unfortunately, Mullis died in 2019, before covid, or I think he would have had much more to say. If you want to look up these interviews, do the search on DuckDuckGo, They will be easier to find there. He called Fauci a liar, and said he would say so to his face.
Graphene has a massive potential to take things to the next level, technology wise.
Instead of Marijuana plants, we might want to have a eucalyptus tree farm.
I’m curious, why eucalyptus? Are they very useful?
Listen here @4:03 to around 05:45
Tells about how researchers found way to produce graphine on large scale using Eucalyptus tree, which cut cost from $100 a gram to just .50c.
Who and why on the Graphene?? Isn't that what is claimed to NOT be affiliated with these vaccines and also isn't graphene one of the major suspects in why these vaccines are turning out to be so deadly? And somebody somewhere got a freaking Nobel prize for the use of that stuff??
Gasoline is extremely useful but not as a replacement for water. Graphene is an extremely useful material. But you can’t blame the material if someone uses it with malicious intent.
Egg Zachary, well I was looking into it, and it seems a novel prize for physics was awarded to a dude for graphene back in 2010, and 2020 was the 10th year anniversary, but I could not find any others for graphene that have been passed out.
The article seemed to imply that graphene is not even real? Just a hypothetical material?
I didn’t know you could win Nobel prize for just making stuff up. 🤡. Is this for real? Where are the physicfags
I noticed they say it's only a 2 dimensional material. And I'm over here, as an engineer aka (physicfag) wondering how in the hell 2 dimensional objects can exist in a 3 dimensional world... I guess because it's only 1 atom thick?? But then what about the subatomic particles? Seems like a matter of perspective... get it...? Matter of Perspective...
Physics humor! Love it!
That’s a good point....isn’t one atom technically 3 D
I believe it is. It technically takes up space. However minute it might be, still space in my opinion.
It’s “2D” in the same sense that a drawing on a piece of paper is “2D”. Of course if you look close enough you’ll find some thickness, but for most practical purposes the object stretches out in only two dimensions.
Understandable. So in this instance they must not be counting the thickness of 1 atom as a dimension since it doesn't reach out any further on that plane than a thickness of 1. But on the X and Y it must go beyond the base unit of 1. Well.... that may be the case, but for the sake of arguing, I will still say the thickness of 1 atom counts. Because that 1 atom is supposedly made up of numerous subatomic particles, the number of protons, neutrons, and electrons depending on the atomic structure. Not to mention the fact that we don't even really know what an actual atom really even looks like when not in motion though, so it could literally all be bologna for all us peasants know. Which makes me wonder how they are even looking at this 1 atom thick atomic structure of graphene. Because thanks to experiments like the double slit, and theories such as Max Planck's particle-wavelength duality... Apparently an atom is both a wave and a particle. And they will act as waves until observed in one moment of spacetime. And going further, we humans distort the structure and behavior of the atom as soon as we shine photons of light on them to observe them in the first place. Because the photons bombard the atom and ruin the originality of what whas there before we decided to look. This is why Einstein and Bohr were always arguing. Einstein was quoted in saying, as he defended classical physics against niels bohr's quantum mechanics by saying, "I will choose to believe the moon is there, even when I am not looking at it."
It's real, the Nobel prize was much afterthey were already observing it. It's just expensive and hard to make do you won't see graphene tires or shoes.
Reading comprehension.
"They produced something that existed only in theory."
If they had added [up until that point] it would perhaps be clearer, but it is quite implied. Ie, it was theorized up until it was then proven to exist.
Edit: Air, and it's various elements, was also at one time theoretical.
You’re right. I didn’t read it correctly.
The intent was probably:
Because the management of the Nobel price has been stolen by the very same people who kicked Nobel out. It was when he got rich for inventing the dynamite they suddenly got interested, in his money.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgLgQ7ySAdE
Interesting
Indeed. This man seemed to start off down the right track to invention, and then...
''Thomas Midgley, The Most Harmful Inventor in History''
https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/science/research/thomas-midgley-harmful-inventor-history/
Well that was an interesting read ... especially the last part.
Good lookin out! 👏👏👏
Quote from the article: "The PCR method of Kary Mullis (chemistry prize) was for the purpose of laboratory production by making a lot of something from a little. The method does not accurately diagnose illness." If you look at Dr. Mullis' video interviews from a few years ago, he says this, himself, and states his mistrust of Dr. Fauci (he knew him from the HIV work). Unfortunately, Mullis died in 2019, before covid, or I think he would have had much more to say. If you want to look up these interviews, do the search on DuckDuckGo, They will be easier to find there. He called Fauci a liar, and said he would say so to his face.
1 of them is for Ivermectin. I'd say that one is legit.
This is a New Trend Beginning with Obama.
Obama won that prize for being black.
The Emmys should let Cuomo KEEP his Emmy. Proof positive they're full of crap.
Who belongs to the Hollywood Illuminati? Who won 2 Oscars? Spacey, Clooney, Spielberg, De Niro, Streep.
Remember when Hussein claimed his, the Norway spiral