What im saying is 100% correct is that if there was a therapeutic there could be no eua vaxx. Hence that's why they've suppressed them all. Everything thing I've read since this farce called covid began supports that. Whether fauxci has read whatever paper, idk
That's actually not correct either. Therapeutic's exist for many viruses and EUA is established by:
Each issuance of an EUA requires that FDA conclude that:
it is reasonable to believe that a given product “may be effective” as an emergency countermeasure
the known and potential benefits of authorization outweigh the known and potential risks
no formally approved alternatives are available at the time.
As much as we want to believe that, HCQ wasn't a known alternative to treat Covid as it emerged. This paper is being kind of tongue in cheek, there's no historical data showing HCQ as a coronavirus treatment.
He wants a gold standard study before trying treatment that has worked in the past? There is not time for that when people are dying. Empirical evidence is not the gold standard of medicine, but it is a powerful contributor to medical knowledge.
This is not his first rodeo. In 1987 Fauci banned doctors from treating AIDS patients with Pneumocystic Pneumonia (PCP) with the antibiotic Bactrim. Doctors knew it was effective, cheap and safe for treating PCP.
17,000 people died because of his ban.
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured at right) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”).
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.”
Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS-CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks.
The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
What im saying is 100% correct is that if there was a therapeutic there could be no eua vaxx. Hence that's why they've suppressed them all. Everything thing I've read since this farce called covid began supports that. Whether fauxci has read whatever paper, idk
That's actually not correct either. Therapeutic's exist for many viruses and EUA is established by:
Each issuance of an EUA requires that FDA conclude that:
it is reasonable to believe that a given product “may be effective” as an emergency countermeasure
the known and potential benefits of authorization outweigh the known and potential risks
no formally approved alternatives are available at the time.
As much as we want to believe that, HCQ wasn't a known alternative to treat Covid as it emerged. This paper is being kind of tongue in cheek, there's no historical data showing HCQ as a coronavirus treatment.
Fauci knew then and knows now.
He wants a gold standard study before trying treatment that has worked in the past? There is not time for that when people are dying. Empirical evidence is not the gold standard of medicine, but it is a powerful contributor to medical knowledge.
This is not his first rodeo. In 1987 Fauci banned doctors from treating AIDS patients with Pneumocystic Pneumonia (PCP) with the antibiotic Bactrim. Doctors knew it was effective, cheap and safe for treating PCP. 17,000 people died because of his ban.
He's a murderous little prick.
Link me to where it worked in the past.
This is enough evidence for me:
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured at right) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”).
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.”
Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS-CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks.
The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2020/07/cover-up-fauci-approved-hydroxychloroquine-15-years-ago-to-cure-coronaviruses-nobody-needed-to-die/
There is no paper because they are purposely not studying
Of course the core point is truthful and massively important
But it's important, when trying to convey critical information, to be impeccable with every detail