In about 30 minutes, Dr. Tom Cowan explains how virology lies about viruses.
Viruses do not exist. They do not make people sick. They are just fragments of material that is created in a laboratory. They do not exist in the human body, or any other animal.
Watch this, and the whole thing makes sense.
SARS-CoV-2 does not exist. Whatever has been making people sick, it is not a virus.
No more vaccines. No more face masks. No more lies. No more funding these criminals.
I've tried to participate in discussions about germ theory vs. terrain theory in the past, and I always end up as confused and/or unconvinced afterwards.
One of the main points that is never addressed satisfactorily is the story about how the Europeans wiped out the Native Americans here in North America with diseases they didn't have immunities towards. How else might this have occurred?
Parasites. You are naming the symptom. Dr. Cowan addresses this with the Chernobyl example. In my view, I believe pretty much all diseases are spread by fecal matter containing parasites. It has been shown polio is spread this way.
i heard it was farm chemicals. see andrew kaufman 'rooster in the river of rats'
Thank you for this. I will watch this. In my research of more than 30 years, I have come to the conclusion that the vast majority of traditional diseases in the past spread through fecal matter. The parasites and toxins within is indisputable. Virologists took some thirty years of research to realize the polio virus was a fecal pathogen. Yes, it’s transmission was fecal-oral - bad anal/hand hygiene or touching a contaminated surface, then pathogen-tainted fingers travel to the mouth. During those frustrating years, they tried control measures such as instructing the public to spray every room in their home with DDT each day.
Yea, that helped. NOT. Now, to add the anal/hand lack of hygiene criteria, toxic chemicals everywhere is added to tax our immune systems and make us more sick.
Good sanitation, good hygiene, and good nutrition is infinitely better at preventing disease than any and all vaccines ever invented. In fact, a pandemic cannot exist when these three criteria are met.
Hell, maybe paleface got redskin drunk on fire water, and a bunch of them died from it, but it was too embarrassing to put in the history books approved by the government. I don't know what happened (or if it happened).
But if viruses do not exist, then it was not a virus. That, we can say for certain.
Good point. And I’m genuinely curious but how come the Europeans weren’t wiped out as well? The isolation would work both ways - we also know there was previous interactions with trade then reported. How accurate are the numbers? So much is theory, so much is unknown. People do get sickS Bacteria infections exist. Siphilis is a bacteria infection, so are most std’s.
There are microscopic things that make people sick - germs, and all of these things are parasites because they require a host. Penicillin is a cure and it is made from mold. The argument is that the virus as it has been described doesn’t exist - and it may be mostly a linguistic argument for the laymen or not medically educated - landscape theory argues instead the ‘virus’ is a byproduct of a reaction, and illness is caused from other issues mostly. So the argument is that the virus is a symptom rather then the cause, and any treatment to the symptom is not curing the cause. The test for viruses and original studies themselves are a fallacy - and it’s recognized as a theory. This is okay, and still useful and amazing. See the studies on the tobacco plant epidemic and the system they used to test for viruses and see if you can spot the ‘problem’. Ask if you have more questions and I’ll try to explain more if I can. Additionally, I won’t rule out either I am still researching but the very idea that something is incurable is strange. HIV especially is strange if you research it.
Good points.
Better sanitation?
Possibly, but natives didn’t have the same overpopulation issues Europeans did and practiced personal hygiene close to the earlier Arabs. And sanitation issues we’d expect to be related more to bacterial infections again - much larger problem then for viruses - few viruses live outside the body long.
Again my medical knowledge is limited this could very well be exactly the reason - but again I am skeptical and instead argue that if a layman is able to cast doubt then certainly some more studies are worth investigating and investing in.
What do you know about it?
Books?
How do you KNOW what happened?
Watch the video.
Then we can talk.
Good point. The Europeans we're able to conquer North America, because most Native Americans died. Some places the death toll was 90+%, and it spread across the continent. Early counts of Native American populations in the West and Pacific Northwest were much higher than counts that occurred later with European settlement in those regions, which seems to indicate that disease took out a significant portion there too.
What if it was just a slaughter by gunfire, and the history books called it a disease for political correctness?
We don't know.
The Native Americans had greater numbers, and they knew the geographical terrain better than the Europeans. I doubt the Europeans could have taken the continent by force, even if they had muskets.
The Pacific Northwest population decline supports a disease. Only a few European explorers went there, and later it was significantly less populated.
What if there never were native Americans 👾👽