I remember seeing this earlier in the year and I believe the source was also from the Hal Turner Radio Show.
There's not any sources in this link, only text. I don't trust any media anymore that can't put up sources for their information. When people try to share this article as true they'll get called out as a crazy person and with good reason, there should always be sources to backup your information and the opportunity for the public to educate themselves further. The article is only meant to be an introduction, a sparknotes, to what is happening. It shouldn't ever be the end-all be-all of information on the subject.
Edit: Here might be a better source. They provide quite a bit more information it looks like but it's dated back to May 24, 2021
To be neutral, why would anyone confirm this before a certain point is reached? Probably the ideal thing to do would be to film everything when it happened, then slowly release the videos/evidence. If you're doing it live, there's a chance for a hell of a lot of people to get killed before they have a chance to talk. I've always had the thought that Killary has (or had) enough money to pay people to break her out of prison.
Passports are another thing. People always say "flag their passport." I keep saying that they have enough money, know enough people and are owed enough favors that they can go wherever they want without a "passport." Passports are for the plebs like us.
To be neutral, why would anyone confirm this before a certain point is reached?
That kind of thinking is lazy and ignorant.
Give some documentation that shit is happening. Don't just post a useless link that gets everyone excited but doesn't confirm or inform anything. If there's nothing to confirm then there's nothing to post as factual. I appreciate your other posts but I'm going to call out lazy useless junk when I see it.
The holocaust is also "well sourced". History is written by the victors and it can be difficult to pierce the veil of whatever narrative has been constructed by the victors.
I never said the Holocaust wasn't well sourced. But if you're explaining to someone the Holocaust do you just send them on a text wall or do you send them to a page with sources that backup the claims? That's a rhetorical question, you send them somewhere with sources dumbass.
If the sources are government court docs or video/audio evidence of people involved/ events taking place, then they have clout and will stand on their own. They can question those all they want.
I remember seeing this earlier in the year and I believe the source was also from the Hal Turner Radio Show.
There's not any sources in this link, only text. I don't trust any media anymore that can't put up sources for their information. When people try to share this article as true they'll get called out as a crazy person and with good reason, there should always be sources to backup your information and the opportunity for the public to educate themselves further. The article is only meant to be an introduction, a sparknotes, to what is happening. It shouldn't ever be the end-all be-all of information on the subject.
Edit: Here might be a better source. They provide quite a bit more information it looks like but it's dated back to May 24, 2021
https://humansarefree.com/2021/03/legal-team-wants-second-nuremberg-tribunal-to-try-global-lockdown-promoters-for-crimes-against-humanity.html
They even include a youtube video with Reiner Feullmich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyfABm1yjkY
Could you please send the link for the podcast or telegram? Your info is much appreciated.
Thank you so much!!!
To be neutral, why would anyone confirm this before a certain point is reached? Probably the ideal thing to do would be to film everything when it happened, then slowly release the videos/evidence. If you're doing it live, there's a chance for a hell of a lot of people to get killed before they have a chance to talk. I've always had the thought that Killary has (or had) enough money to pay people to break her out of prison.
Passports are another thing. People always say "flag their passport." I keep saying that they have enough money, know enough people and are owed enough favors that they can go wherever they want without a "passport." Passports are for the plebs like us.
That kind of thinking is lazy and ignorant.
Give some documentation that shit is happening. Don't just post a useless link that gets everyone excited but doesn't confirm or inform anything. If there's nothing to confirm then there's nothing to post as factual. I appreciate your other posts but I'm going to call out lazy useless junk when I see it.
The holocaust is also "well sourced". History is written by the victors and it can be difficult to pierce the veil of whatever narrative has been constructed by the victors.
I never said the Holocaust wasn't well sourced. But if you're explaining to someone the Holocaust do you just send them on a text wall or do you send them to a page with sources that backup the claims? That's a rhetorical question, you send them somewhere with sources dumbass.
I'm trying to say being willing to question sources is important. Because they're sure as hell going to question/dismiss ours.
If the sources are government court docs or video/audio evidence of people involved/ events taking place, then they have clout and will stand on their own. They can question those all they want.
Whaaat? Get out of here! Everything about the holocaust is 100% real. ;)