This Baldwin shooting incident is getting stranger and stranger.
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Yeah weird. So they get scrubs to replace the workers that were complaining about conditions, then he accidentally shoots the girl that was advocating for the workers? Uncanny, that’s for sure.
https://anonup.com/thread/7019963 ...hope you can see it.
holy shit is that real?
Yeah, the thing with coincidences though.....
Yup. Ritual not accident.
Just the MV Sewol, the korean ferry that 'capsized' killing all the high school kids. Replacement captain just for that trip.
At least this clears up that one shot apparently hit both victims. That had me puzzled.
That's one heck of a blank that can go entirely through one person and hit another.
The movie's apparently set in 1880's Kansas.
Chances are the firearm was of a Colt .45 variety.
As for the "blank," I read it was a live round.
Is this the"gun safety" false flag that we knew was coming? After all, all of their Mass shootings have failed..
I don’t think this is for that at all. It would be way too easy to call them out for playing with weapons and violating all the safety rules gun owners abide by. Also the hypocrites need a good talking to about glorifying gun violence and constantly using it to entertain us.
Hollywood props are supposed to be either non functioning, or have obstructed barrels ight? Interestingly i saw a video in the past few months where a guy tried ever which way to destroy a basket of high point pistols via various barrel blockages.. Things like pounding things into the barrel, drilling holes in th barrel and sticking nails through, welding things into the barrel...I think he made in excess of twenty attempts before actually damaging the firearm. Almost all attempts resulted in portions of tge bullet and obstruction striking a target at 7-10 yds... That is what made me think false flag..
No prop gun fires live rounds, get it.
Live round/blank, prop gun/real.....why was the weapon pointed toward the cinematographer?
Fauchi funded gain of function research
I would saybaldwin wad the safety concern. Idiot