Not a coincidence. The Soros foundation initiated the Bitcoin rise on October 8th when they announced "They owned Bitcoin" (which they clarified to mean they own a "few" bitcoins but the message was sent) and then BTC whales all began pumping money in to surge the price.
Fact checkers scream it's not true, but BTC atms are heavily used for illegal activities. Investigations have shown BTC is used by criminal networks to pay for illegal activities. Several people got busted recently for paying for hit jobs with crypto.
Then this woman was killed in broad daylight on a movie set and it's going to be ruled an accident. The cover up is already in progress. All the usual lefty celebs are crying their crocodile tears.
187s are paid by crypto. It's preferred over cash. It's becoming more common for illegal activities to be paid by crypto. Those BTC atms are hubs for illegal transactions. Fact checkers rushing to say "It's not true".
The woman that died on the "Rust" set is married to a man working for a legal firm that represents Micheal Sussman and the Clintons.
I believe it was a hit job. A paid kill. She was killed in broad daylight with a live gun. It will be swept under the rug as an "accident".
I believe the rise in crypto prices (started by the Soros foundation on October 8th) is because they intend to start putting out contracts for hits like this to scare and intimidate people into silence.
I believe this was the start and a message from the DS.
Just what I'm seeing. Some is my own speculation, but it's how I see the dots. It fits together.
Yes, thank you for clarifying. Makes a lot of sense. I always want to believe the DS is done, but they aren't. I watched Hunt for Red October again tonight. Lots of foreshadowing, lots of references .... today kind of feels like the way I felt after watching The Truman Show.
My own theory is that both side have been operating under a kind of "Rules of engagement" to keep the war silent. For the war to stay silent both sides must agree. DS was fine to play along with such rules because of course they intended to break them or get around them. They think only the idiot good guys will follow the rules.
I suspect one of the rules (pure speculation) is no 187s. Of course the DS would still do them, but they had to be a more discreet. However, discrete 187s take away their power. You want the loved one to know you killed their family member so they shut up.
This is the DS openly saying ***k your rules. I'm tired of this stupid game. (Many of theirs had been forced around in the past few months by indictments, arrests, and resignation to the point that it's threatening their control) and they've decided to just do as they please.
White hat comms (check out my last post) seem to be warning the DS to stop or they will regret it.
But a lot is how I'm reading the comms and events. It's hard to outright prove certain things since so much is clandestine. However, that's why this site can be a great place to try and put the pieces together.
Not a coincidence. The Soros foundation initiated the Bitcoin rise on October 8th when they announced "They owned Bitcoin" (which they clarified to mean they own a "few" bitcoins but the message was sent) and then BTC whales all began pumping money in to surge the price.
Fact checkers scream it's not true, but BTC atms are heavily used for illegal activities. Investigations have shown BTC is used by criminal networks to pay for illegal activities. Several people got busted recently for paying for hit jobs with crypto.
Then this woman was killed in broad daylight on a movie set and it's going to be ruled an accident. The cover up is already in progress. All the usual lefty celebs are crying their crocodile tears.
DS was sending a message.
Supra, connect BTC with this for me, please, fren. I understand each situation but I don't see how they are connected.
187s are paid by crypto. It's preferred over cash. It's becoming more common for illegal activities to be paid by crypto. Those BTC atms are hubs for illegal transactions. Fact checkers rushing to say "It's not true".
The woman that died on the "Rust" set is married to a man working for a legal firm that represents Micheal Sussman and the Clintons.
I believe it was a hit job. A paid kill. She was killed in broad daylight with a live gun. It will be swept under the rug as an "accident".
I believe the rise in crypto prices (started by the Soros foundation on October 8th) is because they intend to start putting out contracts for hits like this to scare and intimidate people into silence.
I believe this was the start and a message from the DS.
Just what I'm seeing. Some is my own speculation, but it's how I see the dots. It fits together.
I hope this cleared up my opinion for you, fren.
Yes, thank you for clarifying. Makes a lot of sense. I always want to believe the DS is done, but they aren't. I watched Hunt for Red October again tonight. Lots of foreshadowing, lots of references .... today kind of feels like the way I felt after watching The Truman Show.
My own theory is that both side have been operating under a kind of "Rules of engagement" to keep the war silent. For the war to stay silent both sides must agree. DS was fine to play along with such rules because of course they intended to break them or get around them. They think only the idiot good guys will follow the rules.
I suspect one of the rules (pure speculation) is no 187s. Of course the DS would still do them, but they had to be a more discreet. However, discrete 187s take away their power. You want the loved one to know you killed their family member so they shut up.
This is the DS openly saying ***k your rules. I'm tired of this stupid game. (Many of theirs had been forced around in the past few months by indictments, arrests, and resignation to the point that it's threatening their control) and they've decided to just do as they please.
White hat comms (check out my last post) seem to be warning the DS to stop or they will regret it.
But a lot is how I'm reading the comms and events. It's hard to outright prove certain things since so much is clandestine. However, that's why this site can be a great place to try and put the pieces together.
I believe your synopsis is spot on.
Cash is used for illegal activities too.
But crypto is better and preferred because it's considered less traceable.
We’re not talking about Dontrell in the street corner selling weed. We’re talking about high dollar volume transfers worth over $4-Million.
Cash, in high amounts, leaves a wake the size of a cruise liner.
With Bitcoin, you don’t need ten shell companies for one thing.
I could go on, but Trump came out against crypto. Reasons mentioned above.