444
Comments (107)
sorted by:
33
SOTUisFUBAR 33 points ago +33 / -0

So... I don't get the angle here. If HRC is behind this, is this a warning to L&W to keep Sussman quiet about HRC/DNC by killing one of their attorney's wife?

A pre-emptive warning not to cross HRC/DNC?

22
7Nick9 22 points ago +22 / -0

They hit close first (think Kemp( Georgia) daughter's boyfriend & car crash) scare tactics before "they" get to you..??🤷

7
Norman_F_Dixon 7 points ago +7 / -0

In my movie Alec Baldwin is a Q double agent and he just took out a Treadstone / Blackbrair covert assassin.

He did have a Q badge in the Hunt For Red October...

https://youtu.be/PUvS_htXD34?t=11 (timestamp / pause to see badge)

3
Eternallife 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good find. He goes on to say captain Ramius, Sean Connery, one year anniversary of his wife death. October 31 is one year anniversary of Sean Connery death.

Q post 14, 10/31/17., Does potus have the goods on most bad actors

1
NJHolyLand 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does that mean Bourne makes a cameo?

1
335K 1 point ago +1 / -0

Strange. Rewatching 30 Rock and initially had the same thoughts about the double agent thing. There are so many glaring comms on that show...

This incident had me rethinking that angle as "too wild to be possible / confirmation bias on my part".. but then here you come with this.

"Great Actors"

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
DeathRayDesigner 4 points ago +4 / -0

No need for the gun to be fake, when all that makes the difference is the ammunition. A non-firing version is easy to make from a real one (just plug the barrel). It is more expensive to make an exact replica than to use the real thing.

Sometimes, semiautomatic pistols need to be reworked (recoil springs) in order to function with blank ammunition.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
MacXimus 3 points ago +3 / -0

And mine says Desert Eagle… Point Five O

2
Qlueless 2 points ago +2 / -0

xxxxxxxxxxx - Be Respectful

xxxxxxxxxxx - Gratuitous vulgarity that offers no merit to the discussion

Gonna ignore these reports but you could use the quotation markup to make it a little more obvious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEcH-BzY61E

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Qlueless 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, quote like this.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Stephanie1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actors adapt. They act. They have limited time to perform the shoot. If they gotta change guns. They must find a way to do it. He's not going to find a reason to not use the gun. He's in character. He will justify the weight change.

1
NJHolyLand 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or its just a lie and he brought a gun bc he's a regular entitled piece of shit in a world gone mad and then everyone covers w a lazy story bc they suckle from him for position

2
NippleSalad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because he has access to a woman who has the power to disappear people.

26
megalithicallstar 26 points ago +27 / -1

CNN will blame the non-vaccinated.

3
fuckdemswithcactus 3 points ago +3 / -0

brilliant

3
makemyday007 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait a minute, are you implying it’s NOT due to the non vaccinated? 🤯

S/

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
12
KimJung-Un 12 points ago +12 / -0

Unbelievable odds

10
bgny [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Baldwin shot and killed Halyna Hutchins, whose husband Matthew Hutchins just happens to be an attorney for DC powerhouse law firm Latham & Watkins - a law firm that represented the Clintons.

Latham & Watkins is representing Hillary Clinton/DNC lawyer Michael Sussmann who was indicted for providing false statements to the FBI by John Durham.

Research links:

https://abc11.com/lawyer-who-represented-clinton-campaign-indicted-for-alleged-false-/11025604

https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/3913988/halyna-hutchins-husband-matthew/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/clinton-white-house-lawyer-doing-095446644.html

https://www.lw.com/news/kathryn-ruemmler-to-rejoin-latham-05202014

-8
deleted -8 points ago +2 / -10
7
DeathRayDesigner 7 points ago +8 / -1

She was a legitimate cinematographer, working on the film. Learn before you leap.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
CantStumpIWin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Creampie does speak the truth.

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +2 / -1

What do her connections have to do with her career?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +1 / -0

And his connection to Clinton is what, exactly?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

She was a legitimate cinematographer, having worked as such on 7 films in the last 4 years. I dare say more than you have. How do you expect people to gain experience when they are at the beginning of their career? And what's with this snide attitude toward an innocent victim?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course she's innocent. She wasn't guilty of anything---nor sentenced to death by a jury of her peers. What kind of twisted world are you living in?

The only reality is that she is a victim of involuntary manslaughter. Or, if you can find the guy who put the bullet in the pistol, perhaps the victim of an assassination conspiracy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
zetts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting, what is your theory?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
SemperSupra 7 points ago +9 / -2

Not a coincidence. The Soros foundation initiated the Bitcoin rise on October 8th when they announced "They owned Bitcoin" (which they clarified to mean they own a "few" bitcoins but the message was sent) and then BTC whales all began pumping money in to surge the price.

Fact checkers scream it's not true, but BTC atms are heavily used for illegal activities. Investigations have shown BTC is used by criminal networks to pay for illegal activities. Several people got busted recently for paying for hit jobs with crypto.

Then this woman was killed in broad daylight on a movie set and it's going to be ruled an accident. The cover up is already in progress. All the usual lefty celebs are crying their crocodile tears.

DS was sending a message.

6
dty6 6 points ago +6 / -0

Supra, connect BTC with this for me, please, fren. I understand each situation but I don't see how they are connected.

13
SemperSupra 13 points ago +13 / -0

187s are paid by crypto. It's preferred over cash. It's becoming more common for illegal activities to be paid by crypto. Those BTC atms are hubs for illegal transactions. Fact checkers rushing to say "It's not true".

The woman that died on the "Rust" set is married to a man working for a legal firm that represents Micheal Sussman and the Clintons.

I believe it was a hit job. A paid kill. She was killed in broad daylight with a live gun. It will be swept under the rug as an "accident".

I believe the rise in crypto prices (started by the Soros foundation on October 8th) is because they intend to start putting out contracts for hits like this to scare and intimidate people into silence.

I believe this was the start and a message from the DS.

Just what I'm seeing. Some is my own speculation, but it's how I see the dots. It fits together.

I hope this cleared up my opinion for you, fren.

4
dty6 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, thank you for clarifying. Makes a lot of sense. I always want to believe the DS is done, but they aren't. I watched Hunt for Red October again tonight. Lots of foreshadowing, lots of references .... today kind of feels like the way I felt after watching The Truman Show.

5
SemperSupra 5 points ago +5 / -0

My own theory is that both side have been operating under a kind of "Rules of engagement" to keep the war silent. For the war to stay silent both sides must agree. DS was fine to play along with such rules because of course they intended to break them or get around them. They think only the idiot good guys will follow the rules.

I suspect one of the rules (pure speculation) is no 187s. Of course the DS would still do them, but they had to be a more discreet. However, discrete 187s take away their power. You want the loved one to know you killed their family member so they shut up.

This is the DS openly saying ***k your rules. I'm tired of this stupid game. (Many of theirs had been forced around in the past few months by indictments, arrests, and resignation to the point that it's threatening their control) and they've decided to just do as they please.

White hat comms (check out my last post) seem to be warning the DS to stop or they will regret it.

But a lot is how I'm reading the comms and events. It's hard to outright prove certain things since so much is clandestine. However, that's why this site can be a great place to try and put the pieces together.

3
dty6 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, you're right. I think you are. I want to believe it's almost over, and I think it is almost over, but it's not all the way over. I'm just happy about DWAC this week. But, yes, that was a loud boom.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
GoGoOptomistic 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe your synopsis is spot on.

4
ParkingLotRanger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cash is used for illegal activities too.

3
SemperSupra 3 points ago +3 / -0

But crypto is better and preferred because it's considered less traceable.

2
BillWhittle24 2 points ago +2 / -0

We’re not talking about Dontrell in the street corner selling weed. We’re talking about high dollar volume transfers worth over $4-Million.

Cash, in high amounts, leaves a wake the size of a cruise liner.

With Bitcoin, you don’t need ten shell companies for one thing.

I could go on, but Trump came out against crypto. Reasons mentioned above.

5
Txn4evr 5 points ago +9 / -4

And Hillary will get away with it again because who's going to stop her, our Justice System, The FBI, The "White Hats"? They're too busy starting social media platforms and selling coins. The Clinton's need to hang. Now!

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
1
GoGoOptomistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe not, again this all sounds like Spectre and No time to Die, from JB, since movies seem to replicate what has happened and what is happening perhaps we need the “real James?” to take them all out.

5
Stekky75 5 points ago +6 / -1

AGAIN! FUCKS ARE ALL INTERCONNECTED LIKE A WEB.

Im done with the black/white hat shit and I don't care anymore. Any of these spiders dead is a good thing.

4
bubble_bursts 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://nypost.com/2021/10/22/halyna-hutchins-husband-says-alec-baldwin-being-very-supportivehalyna-hutchins-husband-says-alec-baldwin-being-very-supportive/

Alec Baldwin being ‘very supportive,’ Halyna Hutchins’ husband says

Looks like husband was in on this. I am calling it.

4
downwithuppish 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm sure it's also a coincidence that Halyna Hutchins worked on a documentary about the 2016 presidential election.

Her degree in international journalism, her background growing up on a Ukraine military base and her interest in investigative journalism makes her just the sort of person who would choose to look into corruption between the US and her homeland, regardless of her political leanings.

Did she find out something that made it's way to Durham's desk? Is that why Sussman went to Hutchin's husbands law firm? To get close to him and put pressure on him? Did the husband sell his wife out for Clinton cash?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Vagrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

She was CIA. Maybe still is...

3
king07828 3 points ago +3 / -0

Arkancide?

2
inquimous 2 points ago +4 / -2

I'd be much more inclined to think it was her knowledge from journalism days that might be a danger to the Bidens or Zero.

2
Vampyregod 2 points ago +2 / -0

Follow the wives.

2
Hodar 2 points ago +3 / -1

Prop guns cannot fire a bullet. Hence the term “prop gun”

No live ammo is allowed on set, because it looks like the fake; except for the weight

So how did a REAL gun; with LIVE ammo get there; unless Baldwin brought it there?

2
DeathRayDesigner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because you need a real gun in order to fire blanks. The issue is not the gun, but the presence of real ammunition.

1
Goldenhawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

consider this ...a well placed sniper shooting on cue ... i want to know the caliber of bullet used .../!

2
Bedminster 2 points ago +2 / -0

(blue in the face) there are no such thing as coincidences.

2
nothingberg 2 points ago +2 / -0

She herself glows. Glowed. Ukranian born grew up in a russian military base and then got into cia erm, hollywood acting / film industry

errr...

1
Vagrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bingo

2
COanon 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about the possibility that Matthew might have been talking to Durham and this was a deep state warning to not say anything?

2
StormSailor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait... so I'm gone for 2 days and come back to find out Alec Baldwin murdered someone? LOL wtf did I miss??? Can someone clue me in?

1
Deplorable69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I think it is a warning to the attorney/law firm to shut Sussman up, as well as an implied threat to Durham and team. Alec Zbaldwin must be arrested and not walk for an “accident.”

1
KTgold 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if the good guys replaced the gun so it would go off? Hitting both Alec and Sussman?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
xbonesny 1 point ago +1 / -0

The film set looks to depict a western style movie....a John Wayne if you will. If this is correct, then they would be using revolvers or wheel guns. You should be able to see the projectiles in the cylinder with the exception of the one round thats facing down the barrel. Once the trigger is pulled, that round thats not visible would rotate to the right and not fire until it comes around again. So if they were all blanks and clearly visible as such, why the one shot one kill? Did Baldwin not check or was he told they were all blanks?

1
frazzledrip 1 point ago +1 / -0

and there it is