Red October - Halyna Hutchins, Alex Baldwin
(i.4cdn.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (175)
sorted by:
Just more proof that, somehow, someway, Q has actively and accurately predicted the future on more than one occasion. It is definitely not something to ignore or write off as 'coincidence'.
As a firm believer in actual sciences, and a life long astronomer ; scientifically, there IS no such thing as coincidence. Coincidence suggest things just randomly happen, out of thin air for zero reason. That, is one million percent NOT possible.
If I think about this on a deeper level it really freaks me out - particularly when I look at it from a mathematical perspective. It's much akin to the feeling you get when you ponder how God always was. No beginning, no end.
Or Q is in control
Watch the TV show DEVS. I'm sure that's what Q is and how they are doing it. It's just data processing but on an astronomical scale.