Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

383
This has been part of my point...!! (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 4 years ago by purkiss80 4 years ago by purkiss80 +383 / -0
54 comments download share
54 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (54)
sorted by:
▲ 27 ▼
– purkiss80 [S] 27 points 4 years ago +27 / -0

Baldwin wasn’t even shooting a scene...

Baldwin has been acting for decades and knows what’s up with safety ...

You can believe this was a Deepstate hit to protect HRC and bunch...

Or

Read the Q’s and understand she’s totally out of having that type of control...

My lean, witness protection The whole thing seems like a psyops ...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BabylonNTing 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

“This is not a drill”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– schiff_for_brains 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0

Why was real ammo even on the set?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– I_Wear_Ten_Masks 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

And why did Baldwin keep gunning people down after his first unscripted kill?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Passthatwrench 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

I read a report yesterday that said a single projectile passed through Halyna Hutchins and entered into the shoulder of Joel Souza. I don't have the sauce as there are too many articles to go through

Enter stage left, JFK Pathologist Michael Baden. He will get to the bottom of this mystery

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AReckoningIsComing 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I read the autopsy stated the opposite. The bullet lodged in her spine. If director was standing behind her that is not possible.

Too much misinfo and dodgy reporting going on.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Passthatwrench 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Wow, ok. Honestly makes more sense with two shots but not looking better for ole Alec. One would think the authorities would have performed a sobriety test. Might be all over if they found any drugs or alcohol.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– LeoDavid 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

Oops I shot someone, let me try this again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– GaIIowBoob 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

The only excuse I can imagine us 1 shot but multiple people hit by it. Do movies even use bullets that can do that? It seems crazy. Every other explanation is he kept shooting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TheTardisPizza 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Do movies even use bullets that can do that?

A .44 magnum bullet can easily do that. I read today that staff were using the gun to fire live ammunition at targets after hours. Gross negligence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– VetforTrump 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

If you believe anything they say you'll be fooled.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– GoatInTheHat 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Wait, how many people did he shoot? My understanding was he fired once, killing one person, and injuring one other as the bullet passed through the first and hit them.

Has more information come to light?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– CharlieWebb 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

Holy Adam Schiff, Batman!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Katrina241 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

I read in one of the many articles out there that she, the director, called for a reshoot and Baldwin jokingly offered to 'shoot' her.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Forbidden_outcast 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

I read that too. Now today, it’s said he was sitting in a pew and practicing his draw🙄

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– VicariousJambi 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Terrible meme. If its a riddler meme it has to rhyme.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– QKek 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Uhhh...because the scene being shot was the gunman (Baldwin) pointing the gun at the audience's perspective. So it required that he point it at the camera. The camera was being operated by Hutchins. It is not that difficult of a concept to grasp.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– purkiss80 [S] 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

That's your opinion....Don't be so condescending....it's also not that difficult .....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– QKek 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Well...it is not my opinion as much as it is a fact. Do you have anything to show that this is not actually the case? Why would you even think it is ANYTHING else?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– purkiss80 [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Really...?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– QKek 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Yes really. If you have any evidence to the contrary, by all means, feel free to post it here. Because if you are correct then there may be reason to charge people with murder. So yeah. Post that evidence...if you have it, that is. Otherwise, your post is nothing more than a meme to gain upvotes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– purkiss80 [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

First of all , you need to get a life man..." your post is nothing more than a meme to gain upvotes."...I Don't give a fuck about votes ...up or down...That's not why I'm here...Don't assume to know me or my motives....Or is it you looking for attention and relevance...? They must be thinking about charging him just for the fun of it I suppose....

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/alec-baldwin-could-be-charged-with-a-crime-for-death-of-halyna-hutchins/ar-AAPQt8I

https://trendingpolitics.com/alec-baldwin-could-be-charged-with-negligent-manslaughter-crugg/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– QKek 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

So you do not in any way whatsoever address the question you posted in your meme. You implied that since it was not actors who died, there would have been no reason to point a gun at them, and therefore, there must be something nefarious afoot.

I pointed out the obvious reason why they had the gun pointed at them. There was nothing nefarious. It was not a secret hit. It was an accident. Plus your link actually states that it is very unlikely that charges would be brought against Baldwin.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BabylonNTing 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

She wasnt behind the camera, they were off to the side looking at a monitor.

Looks like its time to rework your...uhhh theory..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– QKek 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Says who? Do you have anything that supports this claim?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BabylonNTing 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Funny, you want to hold me up to standards you yourself dont adhere to.

Your Saul Alinksky commie tactics are a total fail bruh.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– QKek 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Read the fuking police reports. They spell out exactly what occurred and why everyone involved was where they were at the time.

Baldwin was practicing a cross draw scene. The AD gave him the prop and said 'Cold gun'. During the scene, he was supposed to be pointing at the 'audience' and therefore, the camera. The gun discharged during that rehearsal striking the person operating the camera. The bullet then also struck the person behind her.

If you have ANYTHING AT ALL that says otherwise, post it here and become The Hero Who Blew The Lid Off This Conspiracy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BabylonNTing 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Calm down Commie Bro..

Where is your source link?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– QKek 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

All of the news reports and public statements given to date by everyone involved.

So if you think you have something more reliable than a direct participant, then by all means, feel free to prove a 'commie' wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BabylonNTing 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

QKek Translator: “I am full of shit, believe whatever non-sourced narrative I am trying to spin.”

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– RaymondBPanelli 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

For some reason anyone putting forward this theory is getting downvoted. As a film pede I think it is the most likely scenario. Baldwin was likely pointing slightly off to the side and not directly into the lens. If you've ever heard of the 180 degree rule you know what I'm talking about.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deaddragon 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

he was sitting on a bench inside an old church for a scene and practicing firing the gun into the lens of the camera.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– cdnthought 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

It wasn't a prop gun. That's the media's typical framing deception. Prop guns don't have internal mechanisms for firing. Think like karate disarming practice etc. This was a "cold" gun, meaning a real gun that did not have real ammunition in it. But it did. Why would there be a live round on set? Why would the armorer bring a box of live rounds and then say mix in a few into the blanks? It makes no sense at all. Aiming at a camera person? Maybe if they were blocking out a 1st person view of the person being shot, but why not use finger guns? Live ammo, makes no sense. Then he pointed a real gun at someone....not a prop gun. Then he pulled the trigger.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– greene222 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Riddler meme must rhyme. change the last sentence to "So why was the gun pointed at them, what were the factors? or some better line... as it is, this ruins riddler meme.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SoMuchWinning45 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Prop guns are non-working.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BabylonNTing 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rust_shooting_incident

Responsible for overseeing all weapons on set was the production's armorer, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, daughter of long-time industry armorer Thell Reed. It was Gutierrez-Reed's second film serving as lead armorer after The Old Way, where she had reportedly handed a weapon to child actress Ryan Kiera Armstrong without properly checking it. In September 2021, Reed said loading a prop gun with blank cartridges was "the scariest thing" to her.[10][11]

Lol, whut?

On October 21, seven unionized members of the film's camera crew began packing their belongings at approximately 6:30 a.m. MT in a walkout. They were told to leave the set, with a producer threatening to call the police, and were replaced by four non-union members.[2][3] There was no union prop master present on the set during the incident.[12]

Cinematographer Halyna Hutchins supported the IATSE and planned to strike over dangerous working conditions days before her death.[8] She wrote in an Instagram post: "Standing in #IAsolidarity with our @IATSE crew here in New Mexico on RUST."[9]

The B-camera operator was situated on a camera dolly, looking at a monitor with Hutchins and Souza both nearby. The scene involved Baldwin's character removing a gun from its holster and pointing it towards the camera.[15] While the trio behind the monitor were repositioning the camera to remove a shadow, Baldwin began explaining to the crew how he planned to draw the firearm.[15] When he removed it from the holster, at approximately 1:50 p.m. MT, the prop gun discharged a single time and the projectile flew towards the trio behind the monitor, striking Hutchins in the chest and Souza in the clavicle.[2][13][16][17] The incident was not caught on camera.[15]

There is a Bitchute video where it shows Wikipedia page where gun used was earlier that day for live ammo target practice, and there was two prior incidents of gun safety issues five days before the actual shooting.

Conveniently, an entry was removed stating the union walkout was over paycheck issues along with the 2 other prior safety incidents.

Cloudflare is blocking website, but was reporting that AB was arrested for first degree murder and they found child porn on his phone where judge issued a media blackout.

https://www.conservativebeaver.com/2021/10/23/alec-baldwin-arrested-for-first-degree-murder-and-possession-of-child-pornography-media-blackout/

EDIT:

Found archive link: https://archive.md/UbqUN

Granted Wikipedia isnt the best source for info, but it gave more insight on what isnt being reported and these entries being quietly removed suggests that these statements could be true.

Will add Bitchchute link once I find it again.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BigJilm01 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Shooting into the camera for a POV shot. I’m not saying that it’s not fishy as hell and part of The Plan, but this is plausible.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HopefulSkeptic 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Lot of movies have the person fire the gun at the camera for effect

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Deplorable69 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Yes, I said the same thing. It was a hit job.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– QKek 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It was not involuntary manslaughter on Baldwin's part. It was literally set up as a shot to do exactly what happened. He was supposed to aim at the camera. He was given a prop which was declared to be a cold gun. From his point of view that means is it 100% safe.

The Assistant Director was a complete moron though. He never should have been putting a hand on a gun. That is only supposed to be done by the Prop Master or the Armorer. Period.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– superspathi 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

They're trying to shift blame away from Baldwin, but he held the gun, and he had the ultimate responsibility to ensure it was safe to be used in the way he used it.

Had he ever received any gun safety education? Certainly that too would have been his responsibility to ensure as the film's producer. I'm not concluding anything, but it's not difficult to imagine that anti-gun zealot Baldwin was personally offended by the very idea of receiving any firearm related training.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– VetforTrump 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

You see that was my question. It's murder.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Deplorable69 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

And grieving hubby just happens to be part of the law firm for the Clintons and Sussman. Maybe a warning to hubby?

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy