We could “drain the swamp”
We could “arrest the cabal”
And if we left USURY in place,
The cabal, and the swamp, would be back in business without missing a beat.
The cabal, and the swamp, were able to gain power and influence thru usury.
Usury is the charging of money, for the use of money
Usury is legally defined as charging more interest than is allowed BY LAW.
Jimmy Carter deregulated usury, because poor people needed more DEBT.
Usury has an insatiable appetite, and it always starts slow, turns a corner, and “goes asymptote”, or as they say “to the moon”
Right now we are in the vertical asymptote part of the curve, which is the part just before the big crash.
The crash will happen. That is a certainty.
But how we react to that crash, will be the legacy we leave our children
We NEED to outlaw USURY, at any rate.
All money is to be lent at 0.00% interest.
Any interest rate above 0.00% is a felony punishable by 5 years in prison.
USURY is the way that “the man” skims all of the wealth off of the working people.
ALL WEALTH is derived from LABOR.
And yet, the laborers hardly have anything!
Where does the wealth go?
The wealth is taken from the worker, in the form of income taxes on his paycheck.
Those income taxes go to pay USURY, which is the interest on the so-called “national debt”
The federal income tax was put into place around 1913, which is the same time the Federal Reserve and IRS came into existence.
They had to pass the 16th CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT in 1906 to be able to tax the US workers
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
We need to repeal the 16th amendment, or better yet, amend the amendment, to specifically FORBID the US Congress from having the power to lay or collect taxes on incomes, from whatever sources derived...
Wealth is “redistributed” from the worker, to the bank, in the form of USURY.
The worker pays interest on a mortgage, and interest on a car loan, and interest on credit cards, and interest on student loans,
The worker pays USURY when he pays property taxes on his home, if that money goes to pay interest on bonds.
The USURY of the Federal Reserve is the mechanism by which the Rothschild and Rockefeller et al took over control of the US government, and the American people.
Some of you don’t remember, but back in 2008 there was a HUGE banking crisis,
And at that time, the bankers ‘metaphorically’ held a gun to Nancy Pelosi, and the bankers demanded something like $700Billion in taxpayer money. When asked about how they came up with that number, Pelosi replied that “they needed a really big number”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007–2008
At that time, USURY had already run its course, and was on the verge of collapse,
The bankers frantically tried to ‘correct’, by lowering the USURY rate down lower, and lower, until it was almost at 0%
The reason the bankers kept lowering the rate, was because the internet kept talking about USURY.
So by lowering the interest rate to near 0%, the bankers were able to take USURY debate off the table, while remaining in power, playing the long game.
Recently, the Federal Reserve has been raising interest rates, because, paraphrase, they merely wanted to set interest rates to be closer to where they have traditionally been.
“Traditionally”, interest rates have been used to skim the wealth from the working people.
The Federal Reserve doubled interest rates!
And then, the Federal Reserve doubled interest rates again!
We are still paying interest on the debts incurred to fight World War 1, and World War 2, and every other conflict up to today.
https://i.redd.it/v9p3a4p3q4z31.jpg
We buy wars on credit.
“Nothing can stop what is coming”
what is coming, is a super crash.
But the people, the usurers, who are responsible for the crash, of course will want to remain in power after the crash. They have become accustomed to the lifestyle, and will do anything to maintain that lifestyle.
USURY is how they all came to power,
And ABOLISHING USURY is how they will be permanently removed from power.
End The Fed
End The IRS
Abolish Usury
Just so we are on the same page; the government doesn't control the Fed, the Fed controls the government. We the people (and our government) have zero say in our money supply.
Government controlling the money supply is not necessarily a bad thing, at least historically. Its when government hasn't controlled the money supply that the problems have happened. The constitution states explicitly that only the federal government could control the money supply. They did that because there were always people skimming off the top if the money supply wasn't strictly controlled. This ensured a stable trade platform across states. Historically, the Byzantine empire lasted longer than any other empire (nearly a thousand years) and was the trading hub of the world because the government strictly controlled the money supply and never allowed banks (or bankers) to do anything. This made the currency super stable, and everyone wanted to trade with the Byzantines (Eastern Roman Empire) for a millennia, until the bankers finally got in, then 200 years later the empire fell.
The fact that everything government touches turns to shit is because the government isn't in control of the country and the people aren't in control of their government.
We think of things in terms of how things have been since the bankers took over the United States (which was actually most of the time). We need to forget everything we think we know, because its all based on fraud and lies. Look to history to see what has worked. A federal government really only needs to do two things: control the money supply across all states, and provide the infrastructure for a common defense. Everything else can and should be taken care of by the states. That was how the original constitution was set up. We have deviated from that substantially, due to private bankers.
Government is a corrupt TOOL operating as the sole authorized user of initiated force against others. Anyone else initiating force against others is a criminal and dealt with as such.
So Of COURSE government gets taken over, subverted, corrupted, and used by psychopaths and gangsters. Example: The FDA is a government agency, but it is in fact an agent of Big Pharma.
EVERY government agency is used by non-government forces for their own (private) ends.
Without the get-out-of-jail-free card that government gives to itself for the USE OF INITIATED FORCE, there would be no reason for the Fed or any other group to subvert government for their own ends. The bad guys want that ability to use force to their own ends, and it is THAT commodity that draws psychopaths and gangsters like flies to offal.
I agree with you there. The "need" for government is one of those lies. That's my opinion after decades of thought and research, anyway. And I'm clear that few people agree. I'm not likely to see such a change in my lifetime. It's worth putting the idea out there, though, IMO, because every government becomes corrupted for reasons that seem obvious to me. We HAD a severely limited government in the United States, and NOW we have . . . the Biden Administration. There IS no way to prevent the corruption of a forcible government.
I'm not sure you are seeing the scope.
The Bankers own the world because they start the wars and then get governments to borrow money from them or die. Then they own the governments. The level of fuckery it took to take the U.S. government away from We The People was massive. It isn't some inevitability that we would lose control of government. It is only inevitable if there is a force of that nature trying to do so, and We The People are ignorant of that fact. Once we wake up to that fact, it won't be possible in the future. There also needs to be one other thing that ensures that:
Our constitution must make an explicit statement of citizen sovereignty. Both the DoI and the Constitution made implicit statements of citizen sovereignty. Because it was implicit, it got overwritten, starting with the Bill of Rights (fifth amendment/eminent domain). The Bill of Rights would have been redundant if the constitution had made explicit our sovereignty. That fuckery of omission was I think due to Alexander Hamilton or some other banker interest that was part of the founding.
Most of the things you think of as government agencies are actually private corporations that are government subcontractors, including the FDA. They were started (incorporated) by the Bankers and/or highjacked by them after the fact.
That "get out of jail free card" comes from the fact that the government declared itself sovereign and the people were not. Of course the government needs to be sovereign, it is after all a group of people. A group of people working towards a common goal should be just as sovereign as the people that make up that group. You shouldn't lose sovereignty by joining a group for a common goal. The problem is, it turned into a situation where the government was sovereign and the people were not (right after the fifth amendment as stated).
But you are still putting the cart before the horse. The bankers made a government that they could take over. They had their interests there at the founding. They corrupted the foundation of the government so they could take it over. That is not intrinsic in government, but in our government (and all other governments because the bankers founded them all).
The problem I think is what you think a government is. A government is a group of people working towards a common goal of ensuring the rights of all its citizens. It is founded upon a social contract that is opt in. It is made up of citizens, and thus is a body (corporation) with equal rights to the citizens that make it up. All that is required to make a government incorruptible is a clear declaration of equality between the government and the citizens (all sovereign, all equal under the law).
Every government becomes corrupted because the bankers have designed it that way. They have been doing it for thousands of years. They have been ruling from the shadows for that long. They also have controlled the narrative for that long, so people don't realize the truth of when they have had less control.
Then one can say "no" to it, and either go it alone or join a DIFFERENT group doing what needs to be done. Seriously, this would be meaningless if there weren't competition; competing "governments" that would surely make cooperative arrangements and so on. Without competition in ANY market place, you have shit.
I'm good with non-monopoly "government" that adheres to non-initiation of force. It's the ENFORCED MONOPOLY element of government combined with the legal ability to INITIATE force against people that makes government so evil, so corruptible, and so ripe for take-over by the banks AND by other groups.
I don't know of a single government set up the way you describe (do you?) but again, I'd be good with something called "government" that was an honest, non-coercive institution which people could support or not, without being hunted down and imprisoned for non-payment and non-compliance.
I'm pretty sure this situation currently exists within the U.S. It's not easy, but I've looked into it a little bit. I think it's possible.
That's what states are. That's what countries are.
Setting a standard for money isn't really a monopoly. Since it's a real asset (we are talking about real asset money here) the "monopoly" part is just that a standard is set (legally setting silver as the "baseline" e.g.), and an infrastructure for accessing that baseline asset is in place. It doesn't mean there can be no competition in that baseline. It's just really a standard of measure set into code.
What other monopoly are you talking about?
I'm still talking about government as being minimal. I mean seriously minimal. We started with two pages of laws, most of it talking about the structure of the decision making teams. The behemoth that it became was because of those inherent flaws I mentioned that were put in in the beginning.
This is a bit more tricky. The ability to initiate force against external people (go to war) is I agree problematic, and probably something that should not exist.
But if you are talking about arresting people, or punishing citizens, that must rely on the group (government) and not on an individual. You can't have a society without laws, and you can't have laws if you can't enforce them. The problem I have is not in a state police force, but in the laws. There really only needs to be one law with regards to limits on citizen behavior (with elaboration in the details for specific acts and a range of punishments for them):
That's it. That's the only law that is necessary for a functioning society. That word "direct" is essential. It is where that isn't a part of one of our laws where all the fuckery happens.
This single law structure might get a little tricky when it comes to reckless endangerment, and I'm not sure what to do about that, because that is where all the fuckery in our laws happens (reckless endangerment is a "you might accidentally" infringe on another person's rights by your actions). For example, vaxx mandates would be a reckless endangerment law, but so is reckless driving, or shooting your gun off in town, etc.
I do believe its possible to figure that one out though. Maybe through education.
Our government was set up that way, prior to the Bill of Rights. Its only flaw (which was where all the exploitation happened) was that it stated citizen sovereignty implicitly not explicitly. It was a matter of wording. I could fix our constitution with a few words and close that loophole.
Hence Thos. Jefferson's famous opinions that all government is evil, at best a necessary one; and that people would periodically have to fight and die for their liberty again after it is stolen repeatedly from them by their corrupt government.
Makes me wonder...fast forward to the hazy sunrise of a new dawn, Q op is finished, Great Awakening has occurred, bad guys in prison or in hell, time to unveil our brand new shiny government...how the fuck do we populate it with anyone other than the same sort of narcissists, psychopaths, and sociopaths who are always attracted to the power that being in government confers? It's like there's something wrong, something deeply wrong with people who want to have power over others.
Boy, do you get it, CQVFEFE.
I have no answer to that other than to not put together a coercive center of power in the first place. Destroy the Ring of Power. We abandoned slavery despite the many false arguments against doing so; it's time we abandoned our slavery to the State.