Without understanding the full context of the lawsuit it's hard to say why they ruled such a way.
You have to realize - Barrett and Kavanaugh are both procedural types who hold fairness above their beliefs. This can often result in pretentious overpresentation of their fairness above what is reasonable and lawful.
I don’t agree at all with the ruling, but this link may provide more context: article apparently Maine did away with exemptions for religious reasons a while back and when it came up as a referendum the voters didn’t entertain it. I think this may be an issue of the court not wanting to overrule a state
How the fuck is this constitutional?
Three words.
Equal. Protection. Clause.
I am getting so sick of this fucking terrible movie.
Dittos fren....
Guess Kavanaugh and Barrett are bought and paid for.
Sadly, apparently so....
If Obama had affirmed Merrick Garland for SCOTUS, that would have made 5 of 9 Justices, Jewish.
How the does that happen in a CHRISTIAN COUNTRY ?
Oh well ian now these are whats known as hate questions we can’t be noticing things like that
amy coney barrett is a big piece of shit.
Her and Brett are a couple of head scratchers for sure....
THEY were given stock in all pharma companies
Filed under "Distinct Possibility"....
We still have our guns. That gives me some comfort.
Without understanding the full context of the lawsuit it's hard to say why they ruled such a way.
You have to realize - Barrett and Kavanaugh are both procedural types who hold fairness above their beliefs. This can often result in pretentious overpresentation of their fairness above what is reasonable and lawful.
Regardless of that, the bottom line remains the same....
I don’t agree at all with the ruling, but this link may provide more context: article apparently Maine did away with exemptions for religious reasons a while back and when it came up as a referendum the voters didn’t entertain it. I think this may be an issue of the court not wanting to overrule a state