Be careful there mate..... that article is referencing data from Public Health England (PHE) and is based on a very limited sample which the author has then extrapolated to reach those published figures.....
The conclusions there are not verified so remember to caveat this if you decide to tell someone about this.....
To be honest I'm confused by the data. Can someone explain how they're analyzing the information?
Table from ~page 13 of 33 on the different reports.
Ex:
Weeks 32-35. age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 672.3
Weeks 33-36. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 699.5
Weeks 34-37. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 661.2
So why does weeks 34-37 have a -34.6% immune system degradation and -2.9% weekly decline, if it's a lower number than the rate prior (from 699.5-661.2)?
A comparison of official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - AIDS
Ooohhhhh this is grade A ammo.
Be careful there mate..... that article is referencing data from Public Health England (PHE) and is based on a very limited sample which the author has then extrapolated to reach those published figures.....
The conclusions there are not verified so remember to caveat this if you decide to tell someone about this.....
WWG1WGA
But muh confirmation bias tho
To be honest I'm confused by the data. Can someone explain how they're analyzing the information?
Table from ~page 13 of 33 on the different reports.
Ex:
Weeks 32-35. age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 672.3
Weeks 33-36. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 699.5
Weeks 34-37. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 661.2
So why does weeks 34-37 have a -34.6% immune system degradation and -2.9% weekly decline, if it's a lower number than the rate prior (from 699.5-661.2)?