When I first saw this drop I went down so many rabbit holes...so much sauce in this post alone....😉
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (199)
sorted by:
Would you and u/Doctor_Bees like to name names and draw evidence-based conclusions? I did my part. Maybe how Israel owned Congress 10 years ago but doesn't any longer?
Thanks so much, but I'm generally unimpressed with these because this is working to prove a different proposition, namely that Jews disproportionately get themselves inserted into positions of power; and it takes such a broad definition of "Jew" that it makes the proof relatively meaningless. This doesn't help me understand the bloodlines specifically of Soros and Saud, which is the question Q asked. Also I specifically asked for evidence-based conclusions, not just evidence of racial affiliation.
There is a big Satanic conspiracy, of course, as the Bible tells us, and it's refreshing to get its actors unmasked in real time, but it harms the research for us to distract attention from the common denominator of Satanism and divert it to only a portion of the work. That's why I respect Q for typically calling out Democrats and Republicans equally when giving long lists of evidence of Satanic infiltration. If we focused only on Democrats we would miss the big picture, and the same is true of any race or single family. But we know by inspiration that the big boss is the first rebellious spirit, now called Satan, and that is the (blood) line we need to be pursuing. So I'm still interested in answers to the questions actually in OP and in conclusions that go on the record such as extending the known sphere of influence beyond merely the Rothschild family.
Thank you for taking the time to properly engage (and neutralize) this red herring.
No one here is afraid to say that there are Jews in the cabal. Just as there are Catholics, Muslims, and probably every ethnicity on the planet.
I'd like that to be true of "no one here". I see two clearly defined groups, those who are unafraid to name Jews, Catholics, Orthodox, Prots, Muslims, and pagans, and who hope everyone else is; and those who are afraid to name Jews but who never name anyone else, and who pretend everyone else is.
You are missing the forest for the trees. You need to research the Khazarian mafia (also known in the last couple centuries as Red Jews).
Members of the cabal will pretend to follow whatever religion serves their goals the best. For the past few decades Jews have been a protected class around the world. The cabal has exploited this.
Nice try, but (1) the Bible says repeatedly that the synagogue of Satan are not Jews. (2) Jesus and Paul were circumcised. (3) "Sons of Satan" is a very limited term in the Bible for people who have contracted irrevocably into Satan's family and never refers to race but to adoption. (4) I just relinked a series above about how the hexagram could not possibly be the star of Remphan because the star was mentioned by Amos centuries before pentagrams and hexagrams entered Jerusalem en masse.
I'm pretty sharp on mathematical proofs and your links do not constitute one because they lack (1) a conclusion, (2) a useful definition of the class ("Jew"), and (3) a consideration of causes for the correlation. I've already given what ought to be the valid conclusion from your evidence, namely that "Jews disproportionately get themselves inserted into positions of power." This is admitted by all and to go beyond it needs extra evidence. Again, I'm looking for answers to the OP and it harms your case, and comes close to lack of supporting Q, to derail the question into a narrower field of inquiry.
While you were checking your other accounts and posting kneejerk links I was busy researching Soros's family and found it very interesting that he was an early proponent of Esperanto. That data point is worth quite a lot and has more behind it than lists of Jews in American politics. You didn't pick up on my hint that Trump says Israel no longer controls Congress; do you disagree with him?
Care to provide the reference?