It's a simulation because there isn't any camera to record it. The astronauts are inside the spaceship and can't record video on the outside.
Think about it. When you saw Neil Armstrong take the first steps on the moon, it wasn't really the first steps. Someone had to set up the camera outside the lunar module in order to get the video of Armstrong coming down the ladder to take the first steps.
Of course this is assuming the moon landing was real, but we won't get into that...
Says the man who wouldn't have the first clue to sending a TV picture back from the Moon. The fact that camera technology has had half a century of improvement doesn't cross your mind? Or that the lunar environment is rather harsh? Or that the bit rate available for transmission is far lower than what we are used to with the internet? There's nothing fake about something that is real. The lunar gravity is hard to mimic.
No because I know stopmotion and a shitty Hollywood set when I see one. You think they were talking to Nixon on a landline with no delay? That's retarded. Nobody has been to the moon dude. Nobody has left "low earth orbit ". You believe in cartoons and want to tell me I'm the stupid one.
Duh. The camera was mounted on the exterior of the vehicle. We had gotten quite used to doing that with our satellites and space probes. Just like you can have a door camera for your house, or other surveillance cameras. So, the video of burglars must be a simulation because there wasn't anyone there to hold the camera? Do you realize how stupid that sounds?
Then explain to me why they had to simulate the moon orbit? It plainly states in the old footage that it was a simulation. This is 1969 we're talking about. Hand-held calculators didn't even exist then, let alone your Ring doorbell. Most people still owned black and white TVs.
I don't know what you are even talking about. I presume you are talking about an illustration animation of some sort. In those days, the special effects were real. Stop motion. Optical superposition. No computer-generated imagery. But we did have closed-circuit television, ever since the 1930s, so I don't know why you think we needed a Ring camera on the LEM. You seem to be dreadfully ignorant of the technology in use.
It's a simulation because there isn't any camera to record it. The astronauts are inside the spaceship and can't record video on the outside.
Think about it. When you saw Neil Armstrong take the first steps on the moon, it wasn't really the first steps. Someone had to set up the camera outside the lunar module in order to get the video of Armstrong coming down the ladder to take the first steps.
Of course this is assuming the moon landing was real, but we won't get into that...
All this time, not once did I question how they got the footage. Such a good point you raise.
All the footage looks almost as bad as an old godzilla movie. It's terribly fake.
Says the man who wouldn't have the first clue to sending a TV picture back from the Moon. The fact that camera technology has had half a century of improvement doesn't cross your mind? Or that the lunar environment is rather harsh? Or that the bit rate available for transmission is far lower than what we are used to with the internet? There's nothing fake about something that is real. The lunar gravity is hard to mimic.
No because I know stopmotion and a shitty Hollywood set when I see one. You think they were talking to Nixon on a landline with no delay? That's retarded. Nobody has been to the moon dude. Nobody has left "low earth orbit ". You believe in cartoons and want to tell me I'm the stupid one.
Duh. The camera was mounted on the exterior of the vehicle. We had gotten quite used to doing that with our satellites and space probes. Just like you can have a door camera for your house, or other surveillance cameras. So, the video of burglars must be a simulation because there wasn't anyone there to hold the camera? Do you realize how stupid that sounds?
Then explain to me why they had to simulate the moon orbit? It plainly states in the old footage that it was a simulation. This is 1969 we're talking about. Hand-held calculators didn't even exist then, let alone your Ring doorbell. Most people still owned black and white TVs.
I don't know what you are even talking about. I presume you are talking about an illustration animation of some sort. In those days, the special effects were real. Stop motion. Optical superposition. No computer-generated imagery. But we did have closed-circuit television, ever since the 1930s, so I don't know why you think we needed a Ring camera on the LEM. You seem to be dreadfully ignorant of the technology in use.