569 Here's an interesting, and quite plausible, take on Kyle Rittenhouse and all the drone footage. So much is being exposed and the DS doesn't like it- see: jury intimidation. (gab.com) posted 3 years ago by LucilleBrawl 3 years ago by LucilleBrawl +569 / -0 113 comments share 113 comments share save hide report block hide replies
This lines up well with the drone being focused on that area before the shootings, which otherwise is difficult to explain.
The drone was there for a reason and it sure wasn't to gather evidence to arrest and prosecute the rioters.
Why was the FBI there with a drone at all? They definitely weren't there to arrest any of the protesters.
How/why did the drone footage become public knowledge? You’d think they would do everything possible keep it a secret, if the plan failed.
If the drone was there for a less nefarious purpose the operator would have changed focus to Zaminski when he fired. You can clearly see him fire the weapon yet the drones camera stays glued on Kyle.
Agreed. If anyone manages to tie Rosenbaum, Huber, and dangly together that would be something.
Completely agree. The drone footage is sus how they knew exactly where he was going to be. It's not a random shot they just happened to capture.