I don't think so. Kyle was found not guilty with prejudice, no? This means its dead. Nadler is trying to make political hay here. That little plump turnip needs to pot his ass back in his own manure.
Oh my, oh my it took me waaaay too long to confirm that it was not guilty with prejudice. Finally found it at the end of a huge write up. So that means that he cannot be charged for the same crime. IF they try and grasp up a few little charges, they are being assholes, but I am not sure if they can find anything more than a few fines in that?
What would be the “federal charges”? Homicide is a state crime. The is no “racial” issue because all the parties were white. This is nothing more than a paper tiger threat.
More political persecution. If he was going to be charged with Federal Crimes it should have been done long ago, not waiting around to see if he got life in prison first. This is insane.
You guys are not getting it, They are proposing new Federal Crimes. I am going to delete this post in a bit, with all the negativeness involved. We never thought a Federal Election could be so blatantly stolen and gotten away with either but here we sit, all but defeated.
Even if they were able to crochet a new federal law tomorrow, not a sole could go back and charge Kyle. That would be an ex post facto application... not habbening there.
All I'm saying Fren is most of us here are awake. We are severly allergic to fake news and it incites us pedes to word riot.
I know this post is unpopular, but don't forget their are nuts in Congress right now OPENLY, AS LOUD AS THEY CAN saying a MURDERER was set free today. After the verdict was given.
From the news article : "Kyle Rittenhouse Crossed State Lines Which Means That He Can Be Federally Charged
There are a wide variety of federal charges that Kyle Rittenhouse could potentially face that include civil rights violations and potential hate crimes. The Rittenhouse trial was so tainted by the judge’s behavior that the case deserves a federal review.
The idea that a person can show up at a protest with a loaded assault weapon, killing two people, and then claim self-defense flies in the face of logic and common sense.
Attorney General Merrick Garland has made protecting civil rights a priority at the Justice Department. One can’t think of a bigger civil rights violation than being murdered while exercising one’s First Amendment rights.
The Rittenhouse case is crying out for a DOJ review."
Ok so I read that quote and the author is embellishing at the end there. Anything Rittenhouse was acquitted for today which, I think 3 charges were homicide, he cannot be tried for again. So if they are going to go through with this they need different charges.
I agree with your first statement they are NUTS, cause apparently they have nothing better to do with national crisis after national crisis than to waste my f-ing time.
I agree with you 100 percent, the election won't be stolen, and hundreds of innocent moms and pops will never be locked up for walking harmlessly around in the Capitol building. This is America, land of the free, home of the brave. Anyone who can say "that will never happen" is not paying attention.
we are at war. battles get lost because cheaters play dirty. But they don't usually have God on their side either. I have stood my own ground and been arrested... at the VA. It makes us more empowered to fight. I cry daily, however. because it hurts.
I don't think so. Kyle was found not guilty with prejudice, no? This means its dead. Nadler is trying to make political hay here. That little plump turnip needs to pot his ass back in his own manure.
Oh my, oh my it took me waaaay too long to confirm that it was not guilty with prejudice. Finally found it at the end of a huge write up. So that means that he cannot be charged for the same crime. IF they try and grasp up a few little charges, they are being assholes, but I am not sure if they can find anything more than a few fines in that?
Seriously scummy though!
Only time will tell, these people are mental cases, they still believe the Jan 6th protestors are terrorists.
What would be the “federal charges”? Homicide is a state crime. The is no “racial” issue because all the parties were white. This is nothing more than a paper tiger threat.
Read the article spells it all out.
The judge dismissed the case with PREJUDICE. Any further investigation would constitute double-jeopardy.
More political persecution. If he was going to be charged with Federal Crimes it should have been done long ago, not waiting around to see if he got life in prison first. This is insane.
uh... no.
(there's this little thing called, "Double Jeopardy")
You guys are not getting it, They are proposing new Federal Crimes. I am going to delete this post in a bit, with all the negativeness involved. We never thought a Federal Election could be so blatantly stolen and gotten away with either but here we sit, all but defeated.
Even if they were able to crochet a new federal law tomorrow, not a sole could go back and charge Kyle. That would be an ex post facto application... not habbening there.
All I'm saying Fren is most of us here are awake. We are severly allergic to fake news and it incites us pedes to word riot.
Nadler always has a pair of pampers on, it helps that he likes children
Well, Nads got his name in the fucking paper. Mission accomplished.
Old shitty britches rises from his depends to chirp. STFU shitty britches.
I know this post is unpopular, but don't forget their are nuts in Congress right now OPENLY, AS LOUD AS THEY CAN saying a MURDERER was set free today. After the verdict was given.
From the news article : "Kyle Rittenhouse Crossed State Lines Which Means That He Can Be Federally Charged There are a wide variety of federal charges that Kyle Rittenhouse could potentially face that include civil rights violations and potential hate crimes. The Rittenhouse trial was so tainted by the judge’s behavior that the case deserves a federal review.
The idea that a person can show up at a protest with a loaded assault weapon, killing two people, and then claim self-defense flies in the face of logic and common sense.
Attorney General Merrick Garland has made protecting civil rights a priority at the Justice Department. One can’t think of a bigger civil rights violation than being murdered while exercising one’s First Amendment rights.
The Rittenhouse case is crying out for a DOJ review."
Where in the world did you go to law school? holy moly !!
It is a quote from the article, not my words, boss
Ok so I read that quote and the author is embellishing at the end there. Anything Rittenhouse was acquitted for today which, I think 3 charges were homicide, he cannot be tried for again. So if they are going to go through with this they need different charges.
I agree with your first statement they are NUTS, cause apparently they have nothing better to do with national crisis after national crisis than to waste my f-ing time.
clicking on it gives it credence, ya know.
I agree with you 100 percent, the election won't be stolen, and hundreds of innocent moms and pops will never be locked up for walking harmlessly around in the Capitol building. This is America, land of the free, home of the brave. Anyone who can say "that will never happen" is not paying attention.
we are at war. battles get lost because cheaters play dirty. But they don't usually have God on their side either. I have stood my own ground and been arrested... at the VA. It makes us more empowered to fight. I cry daily, however. because it hurts.
I deleted this post already
Yes-- that. Please.
You can always catch him hanging around the congressional cafeteria buffet.
We're gonna need more rope. A LOT more rope.